Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Climate sensitivity of shrub growth across the tundra biome

This article has been updated

Abstract

Rapid climate warming in the tundra biome has been linked to increasing shrub dominance1,2,3,4. Shrub expansion can modify climate by altering surface albedo, energy and water balance, and permafrost2,5,6,7,8, yet the drivers of shrub growth remain poorly understood. Dendroecological data consisting of multi-decadal time series of annual shrub growth provide an underused resource to explore climate–growth relationships. Here, we analyse circumpolar data from 37 Arctic and alpine sites in 9 countries, including 25 species, and 42,000 annual growth records from 1,821 individuals. Our analyses demonstrate that the sensitivity of shrub growth to climate was: (1) heterogeneous, with European sites showing greater summer temperature sensitivity than North American sites, and (2) higher at sites with greater soil moisture and for taller shrubs (for example, alders and willows) growing at their northern or upper elevational range edges. Across latitude, climate sensitivity of growth was greatest at the boundary between the Low and High Arctic, where permafrost is thawing4 and most of the global permafrost soil carbon pool is stored9. The observed variation in climate–shrub growth relationships should be incorporated into Earth system models to improve future projections of climate change impacts across the tundra biome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Climate sensitivity across the tundra biome.
Figure 2: Comparison of climate models.
Figure 3: Climate sensitivity across gradients.

Change history

  • 06 August 2015

    In the version of this Letter originally published online, the second affiliation for Martin Hallinger was missing: 7Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. The remaining affiliations have been renumbered. In the Acknowledgements, the following information should have been included for M.H.: ‘..., EU ATANS Grant FP6506004 and the scholarship programme of the German Federal Environment Foundation (no. 20008/983) (M.H.)’. These errors have been corrected in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. Elmendorf, S. C. et al. Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nature Clim. Change 2, 453–457 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: Dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 045509 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tape, K. D., Sturm, M. & Racine, C. H. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 686–702 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapin, F. S. et al. Role of land-surface changes in Arctic summer warming. Science 310, 657–660 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blok, D. et al. Shrub expansion may reduce summer permafrost thaw in Siberian tundra. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1296–1305 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinzman, L. D. et al. Trajectory of the Arctic as an integrated system. Ecol. Appl. 23, 1837–1868 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson, R. G. et al. Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 673–677 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hugelius, G. et al. The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: Spatially distributed datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost regions. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5, 3–13 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tape, K., Hallinger, M., Welker, J. & Ruess, R. Landscape heterogeneity of shrub expansion in Arctic Alaska. Ecosystems 15, 711–724 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Post, E. et al. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science 325, 1355–1358 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forbes, B. C., Macias-Fauria, M. & Zetterberg, P. Russian Arctic warming and ‘greening’ are closely tracked by tundra shrub willows. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1542–1554 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macias-Fauria, M., Forbes, B. C., Zetterberg, P. & Kumpula, T. Eurasian Arctic greening reveals teleconnections and the potential for structurally novel ecosystems. Nature Clim. Change 2, 613–618 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sturm, M., Racine, C. H. & Tape, K. D. Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411, 546–547 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallinger, M., Manthey, M. & Wilmking, M. Establishing a missing link: Warm summers and winter snow cover promote shrub expansion into alpine tundra in Scandinavia. New Phytol. 186, 890–899 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blok, D. et al. What are the main climate drivers for shrub growth in Northeastern Siberian tundra? Biogeosciences 8, 1169–1179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weijers, S. et al. No divergence in Cassiope tetragona: Persistence of growth response along a latitudinal temperature gradient and under multi-year experimental warming. Ann. Bot. 110, 653–665 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wullschleger, S. D. et al. Plant functional types in Earth system models: Past experiences and future directions for application of dynamic vegetation models in high-latitude ecosystems. Ann. Bot. 114, 1–16 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ettinger, A. K., Ford, K. R. & HilleRisLambers, J. Climate determines upper, but not lower, altitudinal range limits of Pacific Northwest conifers. Ecology 92, 1323–1331 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. HilleRisLambers, J., Harsch, M. A., Ettinger, A. K., Ford, K. R. & Theobald, E. J. How will biotic interactions influence climate change-induced range shifts? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1297, 112–125 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacArthur, R. H. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species (Princeton Univ. Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grime, J. P. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111, 1169–1194 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilmking, M. & Myers-Smith, I. Changing climate sensitivity of black spruce (Picea mariana Mill.) in a peatland-forest landscape in Interior Alaska. Dendrochronologia 25, 167–175 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elmendorf, S. C. et al. Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: Heterogeneity over space and time. Ecol. Lett. 15, 164–175 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S. & Duncan, R. P. Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1040–1049 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beck, P. S. A. et al. Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift. Ecol. Lett. 14, 373–379 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Olofsson, J. et al. Herbivores inhibit climate-driven shrub expansion on the tundra. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2681–2693 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R. & Chapin, F. S. Primary and secondary stem growth in Arctic shrubs: Implications for community response to environmental change. J. Ecol. 90, 251–267 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the many field and laboratory assistants for help with data collection, and the governments, parks, field stations and local and indigenous people for the opportunity to conduct research on their land. Financial support was provided by the International Arctic Science Committee (All), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig (sTUNDRA working group), the EnviroNorth CREATE grant (I.H.M.-S.), International Polar Year Programs of the Government of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Northern Scientific Training Program (I.H.M.-S., D.S.H., M.V., S.A.R., N.B.-L., E.L., A.J.T., L.H., L.S.C., T.C.L.), INTERACT (262693), 7th Framework Programme, Virtual Institute ICLEA of the Helmholtz Foundation (M.W. and A.Buras), Wageningen University and Research Center, Darwin Center for Biogeosciences, Danish National Research Foundation (CENPERM DNRF100) (D.B.), Swedish Polar Secretariat (S.A.R.), Academy of Finland, Nordic Centre of Excellence TUNDRA, NASA Land Cover/Land-Use Change Program (B.C.F. and M.M.-F.), Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship (NE/L011859/1) (M.M.-F.), Research Council of Norway (Project 212897) (J.D.M.S.), Fonds de recherche du Québec: Nature et technologies (N.B.-L., E.L., M.V.) and Centre d’études Nordiques, ArcticNet—a network of centres of excellence (S.A.R., N.B.-L., E.L., A.J.T., L.H., L.S.C.), Polar Continental Shelf Program (S.A.R., N.B.-L., E.L.), Canada Foundation for Innovation (T.C.L.), WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF (to C.R., M.A.D., J.A.W., S.Wipf), Knud Højgaard Charity Foundation (N.M.S.), The Northern Worlds initiative of the National Museum of Denmark (C.B.), IPY-NWO (project 851.40.051) (S.Weijers), Polish National Science Centre (project N306 009139) (A.Buchwal), Virtual Institute ICLEA of the Helmholtz Foundation (A.Buras), National Science Foundation (ARC-0806506) (A.T.N.), University of Zurich Research Priority Program ‘Global Change and Biodiversity’ (G.S.-S.), Woods Hole Research Center (K.C.G.), The Research Council of Norway (V.R.), EU ATANS Grant FP6506004 and the scholarship programme of the German Federal Environment Foundation (no. 20008/983) (M.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors designed the study, collected or processed data and assisted in writing the paper; I.H.M.-S. and M.V. took the lead in writing the paper; I.H.M.-S. analysed the data with assistance from S.C.E.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isla H. Myers-Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myers-Smith, I., Elmendorf, S., Beck, P. et al. Climate sensitivity of shrub growth across the tundra biome. Nature Clim Change 5, 887–891 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2697

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing