Letter

Trade-off between intensity and frequency of global tropical cyclones

  • Nature Climate Change volume 5, pages 661664 (2015)
  • doi:10.1038/nclimate2646
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:

Abstract

Global tropical cyclone climate has been investigated with indicators of frequency, intensity1 and activity2,3. However, a full understanding of global warming’s influence on tropical cyclone climate remains elusive because of the incomplete nature of these indicators. Here we form a complete three-dimensional variability space of tropical cyclone climate where the variabilities are continuously linked and find that global ocean warmth best explains the out-of-phase relationship between intensity and frequency of global tropical cyclones. In a year with greater ocean warmth, the tropical troposphere is capped by higher pressure anomaly in the middle and upper troposphere even with higher moist static energy anomaly in the lower troposphere, which is thought to inhibit overall tropical cyclone occurrences but lead to greater intensities. A statistical consequence is the trade-off between intensity and frequency. We calculate an average increase in global tropical cyclone intensity of 1.3 m s−1 over the past 30 years of ocean warming occurring at the expense of 6.1 tropical cyclones worldwide.

  • Subscribe to Nature Climate Change for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309, 1844–1846 (2005).

  2. 2.

    et al. Climate assessment for 1999. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, s1–s50 (2000).

  3. 3.

    Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436, 686–688 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Natural Hazards, Unnatural Disasters: The Economics of Effective Prevention (World Bank, United Nations, 2010)

  5. 5.

    , , & The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nature Clim. Change 2, 205–209 (2012).

  6. 6.

    et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nature Geosci. 3, 157–163 (2010).

  7. 7.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1248–1251Ch. 14, (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  8. 8.

    , & The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455, 92–95 (2008).

  9. 9.

    & Recent intense hurricane response to global climate change. Clim. Dynam. 42, 617–627 (2014).

  10. 10.

    & An empirical framework for tropical cyclone climatology. Clim. Dynam. 39, 669–680 (2012).

  11. 11.

    et al. Weakening of tropical Pacific atmospheric circulation due to anthropogenic forcing. Nature 441, 73–76 (2006).

  12. 12.

    , & Changes in gross moist stability in the tropics under global warming. Clim. Dynam. 41, 2481–2496 (2013).

  13. 13.

    & Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).

  14. 14.

    , & Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Clim. 26, 9960–9976 (2013).

  15. 15.

    , & Trend discrepancies among three best track data sets of western North Pacific tropical cyclones. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D12128 (2010).

  16. 16.

    & Quantifying interagency differences in tropical cyclone best-track wind speed estimates. Mon. Weath. Rev. 38, 1459–1473 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Applications Laboratory Training Notes (NOAA National Environmental Satellite Service, 1982)

  18. 18.

    et al. The Dvorak tropical cyclone intensity estimation technique: A satellite-based method that has endured for over 30 years. Bull. Am. Meterol. Soc. 87, 1195–1210 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Tropical Cyclone Intensity Analysis Using Satellite Data Report no. 11 (NOAA Tech. Rep., 1984)

  20. 20.

    & Consensus on climate trends in western North Pacific tropical cyclones. J. Clim. 25, 7564–7573 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute at the Florida State University (contribution number 471).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA

    • Nam-Young Kang
    •  & James B. Elsner
  2. Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul 156720, South Korea

    • Nam-Young Kang

Authors

  1. Search for Nam-Young Kang in:

  2. Search for James B. Elsner in:

Contributions

Authors contributed equally to planning, experiment, analysis and writing, with N-Y.K. being the lead author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam-Young Kang.

Supplementary information