Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Effect of residential solar and storage on centralized electricity supply systems

Subjects

Abstract

Residential solar photovoltaic systems combined with affordable battery storage are becoming increasingly likely to drive a consumer-led, low-emission evolution of modern electricity supply systems. In the past decade, a multi-billion-dollar boom in solar photovoltaic development across the globe has disrupted the way in which centralized electricity systems operate. At the same time, solar photovoltaic power has begun to make a material contribution to reduction targets for greenhouse gas emissions. Viable electricity storage solutions are now on the cusp of a rapidly declining price trajectory. When coupled with solar photovoltaic systems, battery storage could become one of the most disruptive influences to impact the electricity sector in decades, yet governments and the broader power sector are poorly prepared. In this Perspective, we examine emerging trends and proffer a systems framework to analyse the disruptive influence of residential solar photovoltaic and storage systems on existing centralized electricity supply systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Factors influencing the rate and scale of solar PV and storage deployment.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  2. Energy Technology Perspectives 2014: Harnessing Electricity's Potential (IEA, 2014).

  3. PVPS Report Snapshot of Global PV 1992–2013 (IEA, 2014).

  4. Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics 2014–2018 (European Photovoltaic Industry Association, 2014).

  5. Technology Roadmap: Solar Photovoltaic Energy 2014 (IEA, 2014).

  6. World Energy Outlook 2013 (IEA, 2013).

  7. Nugent, D. & Sovacool, B. Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey. Energy Policy 65, 229–244 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. IEA Statistics: Electricity Information 2014 (IEA, 2014).

  9. Feldman, D. et al. Photovoltaic System Pricing Trends: Historical, Recent and Near-Term Projects 2014 (US DOE, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. de La Tour, A, Glachant, M. & Ménière Y. Predicting the costs of photovoltaic solar modules in 2020 using experience curve models. Energy 62, 341–348 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Solar Photovoltaics Technology Brief (IRENA and IEA, 2013).

  12. Solar Energy Prices See Double-digit Declines in 2013; Trend Expected to Continue (NREL, 2014); http://www.nrel.gov/news/press/2014/15405.html

  13. Sener, C. & Fthenakis, V. Energy policy and financing options to achieve solar energy grid penetration targets: Accounting for external costs. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 32, 854–868 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Passey, R., Spooner, T., MacGill, I., Watt, M. & Syngellakis, K. The potential impacts of grid-connected distributed generation and how to address them: A review of technical and non-technical factors. Energy Policy 39, 6280–6290 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zahedi, A. Maximizing solar PV energy penetration using energy storage technology. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 15, 866–870 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Energy Transformation: The Impact on the Power Sector Business Model. The 13th PWC Annual Global Power & Utilities Survey (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2013).

  17. Change and Choice. The Future Grid Forum's Analysis of Australia's Potential Electricity Pathways to 2050 (CSIRO, 2013).

  18. Heymans, C., Walker, S. B., Young, S. B. & Fowler, M. Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and load-levelling. Energy Policy 71, 22–30 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, Z. et al. Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem. Rev. 111, 3577–3613 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigoleit, T., Rothacher, T. & Hildebrandt, M. Industry Overview: The Photovoltaic Market in Germany (Germany Trade and Invest, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly-Detwiler, P. Combination of solar and on-site storage an emerging threat to utilities. Forbes (9 November 2013); http://go.nature.com/9V8UZ3

    Google Scholar 

  22. Planned 2020 Gigafactory Production Exceeds 2013 Global Production (Tesla Motors, 2014); http://www.teslamotors.com/sites/default/files/blog_attachments/gigafactory.pdf

  23. Byrd, S., Jonas, A., Flannery, S. & Radcliff, T. Clean Tech, Utilities and Autos: Batteries and Distributed Generation May Be a Negative for Utilities (Morgan Stanley, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Integrated Grid: Realising the Full Value of Central and Distributed Energy Resources: (EPRI, 2014).

  25. Pistoia, G. Lithium-Ion Batteries: Advances and Applications (Elsevier, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 (IEA, 2012).

  27. The Economics of Grid Defection: When and Where Distributed Solar Generation plus Storage Completes with Traditional Utility Service (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2014).

  28. Koh, Y. C., Mateer, H., Preclaw, R., Price, G. & Chen, B. The Solar Vortex: Credit Implications of Electric Grid Defection (Barclays, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Utility of the Future: A Customer-Led Shift in the Electricity Sector (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2014).

  30. Future Grid Forum: Change and Choice (CSIRO, 2013).

  31. Sterman, J. D. System dynamics modeling. Calif. Managem. Rev. 43, 8–25 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hjorth, P. & Bagheri, A. Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach. Futures 38, 74–92 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sterman, J. D. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World Vol. 19 (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Balcombe, P., Rigby, D. & Azapagic, A. Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK. Appl. Energy 130, 403–418 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rickerson, W. et al. Residential Prosumers: Drivers and Policy Options (Re-prosumers) (IEA Renewable Energy Technology Development, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.A. researched and wrote the paper. P.D. provided advice on the development of the paper and editorial input.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Agnew.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agnew, S., Dargusch, P. Effect of residential solar and storage on centralized electricity supply systems. Nature Clim Change 5, 315–318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2523

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing