Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

US climate policy needs behavioural science

State implementation of new Environmental Protection Agency climate regulation may shift behavioural strategies from sidelines to forefront of US climate policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Fowlie, M. et al. Science 346, 815–816 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J. M., Stern, P. C. & Vandenbergh, M. P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18452–18456 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern, P. C. et al. Eval. Rev. 10, 147–176 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ansolabehere, S. & Fri, R. W. Daedalus 142, 162–171 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sovacool, B. K. Nature 511, 4–5 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Granade, H. C. et al. Unlocking the Energy Efficiency in the US Economy (McKinsey, 2009);

    Google Scholar 

  7. US National Research Council Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change (National Academy Press, 2010).

  8. Vandenbergh, M. P., Stern, P. C., Gardner, G. T., Dietz, T. & Gilligan, J. M. Environ. Law Rep. 40, 10547–10554 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fleet Drivers and Fuel-Smart Driving (Environmental Defense Fund, 2009).

  10. Mazur-Stommen, S. & Farley, K. ACEEE Field Guide to Utility-Run Behavior Programs (ACEEE, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vandenbergh, M. P., Carrico, A. R. & Bressman, L. S. Minn. Law Rev. 95, 715–781 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Environment Protection Agency Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 79 FR 34829 (Federal Register, 2014);

  13. Allcott, H. & Mullainathan, S. Science 327, 1204–1205 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Todd, A., Stuart, E. & Goldman, C. 2012 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (ACEEE, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frank, K. A. & Maroulis, S. J. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 35, 437–460 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T. & Vandenbergh, M. P. Glob. Environ. Change 29, 127–138 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


M. McLean and B. Tenbarge provided research assistance. T.D.'s contributions were supported in part by Michigan AgBioResearch. This work is that of the authors as individuals, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the US National Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda R. Carrico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carrico, A., Vandenbergh, M., Stern, P. et al. US climate policy needs behavioural science. Nature Clim Change 5, 177–179 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing