Letter | Published:

Physiological plasticity increases resilience of ectothermic animals to climate change

Nature Climate Change volume 5, pages 6166 (2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Understanding how climate change affects natural populations remains one of the greatest challenges for ecology and management of natural resources. Animals can remodel their physiology to compensate for the effects of temperature variation, and this physiological plasticity, or acclimation, can confer resilience to climate change1,2. The current lack of a comprehensive analysis of the capacity for physiological plasticity across taxonomic groups and geographic regions, however, constrains predictions of the impacts of climate change. Here, we assembled the largest database to date to establish the current state of knowledge of physiological plasticity in ectothermic animals. We show that acclimation decreases the sensitivity to temperature and climate change of freshwater and marine animals, but less so in terrestrial animals. Animals from more stable environments have greater capacity for acclimation, and there is a significant trend showing that the capacity for thermal acclimation increases with decreasing latitude. Despite the capacity for acclimation, climate change over the past 20 years has already resulted in increased physiological rates of up to 20%, and we predict further future increases under climate change. The generality of these predictions is limited, however, because much of the world is drastically undersampled in the literature, and these undersampled regions are the areas of greatest need for future research efforts.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: Towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000357 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Sgrò C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 1435–1446 (2009).

  4. 4.

    The evolution of genetic canalization under fluctuating selection. Evolution 54, 1–12 (2000).

  5. 5.

    et al. Abrupt climate change. Science 299, 2005–2010 (2003).

  6. 6.

    Functional significance of metabolic responses to thermal acclimation in fish muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 259, R245–R252 (1990).

  7. 7.

    & Testing the beneficial acclimation hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 66–70 (2002).

  8. 8.

    & Evolutionary analyses of morphological and physiological plasticity in thermally variable environments. Am. Zool. 38, 545–560 (1998).

  9. 9.

    , & An information-theoretic approach to evaluating the size and temperature dependence of metabolic rate. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3616–3621 (2012).

  10. 10.

    , & Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming. Nature 467, 704–706 (2010).

  11. 11.

    , & Putting the heat on tropical animals. Science 320, 1296–1297 (2008).

  12. 12.

    et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).

  13. 13.

    & Stitch the niche—a practical philosophy and visual schematic for the niche concept. J. Biogeogr. 39, 2103–2111 (2012).

  14. 14.

    et al. Predicting organismal vulnerability to climate warming: Roles of behaviour, physiology and adaptation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1665–1679 (2012).

  15. 15.

    & The demographic impacts of shifts in climate means and extremes on alpine butterflies. Funct. Ecol. 26, 969–977 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , & Relative contribution of quantitative and qualitative changes in mitochondria to metabolic compensation during seasonal acclimatisation of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2961–2970 (1998).

  17. 17.

    et al. Plasticity of oxidative metabolism in variable climates: Molecular mechanisms. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 83, 721–732 (2010).

  18. 18.

    & Metabolism in the age of ‘omes’. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 2351–2357 (2012).

  19. 19.

    , & Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 77–81 (1998).

  20. 20.

    , & Phenotypic clines, energy balances and ecological responses to climate change. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 41–50 (2014).

  21. 21.

    , & lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. (2012);

  22. 22.

    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013);

  23. 23.

    , , , & Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

  24. 24.

    , , & Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2013).

  25. 25.

    & raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. Version 2.1-16. (2013);

  26. 26.

    , & rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. (2013);

  27. 27.

    , & A simple lumped model to convert air temperature into surface water temperature in lakes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 10, 2697–2741 (2013).

  28. 28.

    , , & Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J. Clim. 21, 2283–2296 (2008).

  29. 29.

    & Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. B. Huey for comments on a draft of this manuscript and D. Ortiz-Barrientos for advice. C.R.W. is supported by fellowships from the Australian Research Council. This research was supported by an ARC Discovery Grant to F.S.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

    • Frank Seebacher
  2. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia

    • Craig R. White
    •  & Craig E. Franklin

Authors

  1. Search for Frank Seebacher in:

  2. Search for Craig R. White in:

  3. Search for Craig E. Franklin in:

Contributions

F.S. and C.E.F. conceived the idea and extracted the data from the literature, C.R.W. conducted the analysis, wrote the manuscript and prepared figures, F.S. wrote the manuscript and prepared figures, and C.E.F. edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Seebacher.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2457

Further reading