Facing the diversity crisis in climate science

The climate movement is failing to engage a diverse set of stakeholders in efforts to address climate change, and a lack of diversity within the climate community itself may be, in part, to blame. Research-informed solutions are urgently needed to address the problem and help build a more inclusive and influential movement.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Occupational disparities within the United States across 16 physical and life science classifications.
Figure 2

References

  1. 1

    Taylor, D. E. The State of Diversity in Environmental Organizations: Mainstream NGOs, Foundations and Government Agencies (Green 2.0, 2014); www.diversegreen.org/report

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

  3. 3

    Mohai, P. Res. Soc. Prob. Public Policy 15, 21–49 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. & Jenkins, C. Climatic Change 114, 169–188 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Anderegg, W. R. L. & Goldsmith, G. R. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 1–8 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Taylor, D. E. Res. Soc. Prob. Public Policy 18, 385–407 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Landivar, L. C. Disparities in STEM Employment by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin (US Census Bureau, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Leiserowitz, A. & Akerlof, K. Race, Ethnicity and Public Responses to Climate Change (Yale Project on Climate Change, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M. & Gross, J. J. Psychol. Sci. 18, 879–885 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Purdie-Vaughns, V. et al. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 615–630 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M. & McManus, M. A. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 255–270 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Unzueta, M. M. & Binning, K. R. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 38, 26–38 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Steinke, J. et al. Sci. Commun. 29, 35–64 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Pearson, A. R. & West, J. in Proc. Soc. Pers. Soc. Psychol. (eds Finkel, E. & Kaiser, C.) 107–108 (Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2014).

  15. 15

    Kraft, M. & Kamieniecki, S. Handbook of US Environmental Policy (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Cheryan, S., Plaut. V. C., Handron, C. & Hudson, L. Sex Roles 69, 58–71 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Schuldt, J. P., Konrath, S. H. & Schwarz, N. Public Opin. Quart. 75, 115–124 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Apfelbaum, E. P., Norton, M. I. & Sommers, S. R. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21, 205–209 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Dobbin, F. & Kalev, A. Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam R. Pearson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pearson, A., Schuldt, J. Facing the diversity crisis in climate science. Nature Clim Change 4, 1039–1042 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2415

Download citation

Further reading