Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO2 emissions growth in India


Impetus to expand electricity access in developing nations is urgent1. Yet aspirations to provide universal access to electricity are often considered potentially conflicting with efforts to mitigate climate change2. How much newly electrified, largely poor, households raise emissions, however, remains uncertain. Results from a first retrospective analysis show that improvements in household electricity access contributed 3–4% of national emissions growth in India over the past three decades. Emissions from both the direct and indirect electricity use of more than 650 million people connected since 1981 accounted for 11–25% of Indian emissions growth or, on average, a rise of 0.008–0.018 tons of CO2 per person per year between 1981 and 2011. Although this is a marginal share of global emissions, it does not detract from the importance for developing countries to start reducing the carbon intensities of their electricity generation to ensure sustainable development and avoid future carbon lock-in3,4. Significant ancillary benefits for air quality, health, energy security and efficiency may also make this attractive for reasons other than climate mitigation alone5,6.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Estimates of rural, urban and national household access rates, and average direct household electricity use per connected household between 1981 and 2011 from the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) and National Sample Survey (NSS) data sets.
Figure 2: Decomposition of changes in CO2 emissions from direct household electricity use.


  1. 1

    Secretary-General UN A Vision Statement by Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General of the United Nations — Sustainable Energy for all (United Nations, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Moss, T., Roger Pielke, J. & Bazilian, M. Balancing Energy Access and Environmental Goals in Development Finance: The Case of the OPIC Carbon Cap (Center for Global Development, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Rogelj, J. et al. Halfway to Copenhagen, no way to 2 °C. Nature Clim. Change 3, 81–83 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bertram, C. et al. Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2013).

  5. 5

    Wilkinson, P. et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Household energy. Lancet 374, 1917–1929 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    IPCC in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Khandker, S. R., Samad, H. A., Ali, R. & Barnes, D. F. Who benefits most from rural electrification? Evidence in India. Energy J. 35, 75–96 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Dinkelman, T. The effects of rural electrification on employment: New evidence from South Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 3078–3108 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Rao, N. D. Does (better) electricity supply increase household enterprise income in India? Energy Policy 57, 532–541 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Registrar General of India Data on Housing, Table H Series (Census of India, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Barnes, D. F. The Challenge of Rural Electrification: Strategies for Developing Countries (RFF Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bhattacharyya, S. C. Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis. Energy Sustain. Dev. 16, 260–271 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    GEA Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge Univ. Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Nilsson, M. et al. Energy for a Shared Development Agenda: Global Scenarios and Governance Implications (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Matthews, H. D. et al. National contributions to observed global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 014010 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Chakravarty, S. & Tavoni, M. Energy poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation: Is there a trade off? Energy Econ. 40, S67–S73 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Pachauri, S. et al. Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024015 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    IEA CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Statistics (OECD and IEA, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    NSSO Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys (National Sample Survey Organization, Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation).

  20. 20

    CEA All India Electricity Statistics General Review (Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power).

  21. 21

    Shrestha, R. M., Anandarajah, G. & Liyanage, M. H. Factors affecting CO2 emission from the power sector of selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Energy Policy 37, 2375–2384 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Pachauri, S. & Spreng, D. in Tackling Long-Term Energy Problems: The Contribution of Social Science (eds Spreng, D., Flueler, T., Goldblatt, D. L. & Minsch, J.) 73–96 Ch. 5, (Springer, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Pachauri, S. An Energy Analysis of Household Consumption: Changing Patterns of Direct and Indirect Use in India (Springer, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Grubler, A. & Pachauri, S. Problems with burden-sharing proposal among one billion high emitters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, E122–123; author reply E124 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Chakravarty, S. & Ramana, M. V. in Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics and Governance (ed Dubash, N. K.) 218–229 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    IEA World Energy Outlook 2011 (International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    AGECC Energy for a Sustainable Future: Summary Report and Recommendations (The UN Secretary-General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change (AGECC), 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Action, P. Poor Peoples Energy Outlook 2010 (Practical Action, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Narula, K., Nagai, Y. & Pachauri, S. The role of decentralized distributed generation in achieving universal rural electrification in South Asia by 2030. Energy Policy 47, 345–357 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Ang, B. W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy. Energy Policy 32, 1131–1139 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work uses data from the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation of the Government of India, the Census of India, and India’s Central Electricity Authority. I thank my IIASA colleagues in the Energy (ENE) program for useful discussions and comments, and my colleagues in the Communications Department for help with the figures. I am also grateful to A. Grubler, K.R. Smith and D. Spreng for valuable feedback on initial drafts.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shonali Pachauri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pachauri, S. Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO2 emissions growth in India. Nature Clim Change 4, 1073–1076 (2014).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing