Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage could be used to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, its credibility as a climate change mitigation option is unproven and its widespread deployment in climate stabilization scenarios might become a dangerous distraction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Protecting boreal caribou habitat can help conserve biodiversity and safeguard large quantities of soil carbon in Canada
Scientific Reports Open Access 12 October 2022
-
Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Open Access 03 October 2022
-
Mapping county-level vulnerability to the energy transition in US fossil fuel communities
Scientific Reports Open Access 21 September 2022
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
114,72 €
only 9,56 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.


References
Allen, M. R. et al. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Nature Geosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2248 (2014).
Boden, T. A. et al. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2013).
Le Quéré, C. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 6, 235–263 (2014).
Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).
Tavoni, M. & Socolow, R. Climatic Change 118, 1–14 (2013).
Raupach M. R. & Canadell, J. G. in The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe (eds Dolman A. J. et al.) 5–32 (Springer, 2008).
Jones, C. et al. J. Clim. 26, 4398–4413 (2013).
Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. & Matthews, H. D. Science 29, 1330–1333 (2010).
Creutzig, F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. http://go.nature.com/F6JxKX (2014).
Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H. & Haszeldine, R. S. Nature Clim. Change 3, 105–111 (2012).
Fuss, S., Reuter, W-H., Szolgayova, J. & Obersteiner, M. Climatic Change 118, 73–87 (2013).
Kriegler, E., Edenhofer, O., Reuster, L., Luderer, G. & Klein, D. Climatic Change 118, 45–57 (2013).
Kraxner, F. et al. Rene 61, 102–108 (2014).
Kato, E. & Yamagata, Y. Earth's Future http://go.nature.com/nobafN (2014).
Popp, A. et al. Climatic Change 123, 495–509 (2014).
Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future Ch. 20, 1459–1526 (Cambridge Univ. Press and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
Smith, P. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 11 (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).
Cao, L. & Caldeira, K. Environ Res. Lett. 5, 024011 (2010).
Vichi, M., Navarra, A. & Fogli, P. G. Climatic Change 118, 105–118 (2013).
Kravitz, B. et al. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 8320–8332 (2013).
IPCC Summary for Policymakers in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is a collaborative effort under the MaGNET (Managing Global Negative Emissions Technologies) initiative of the Global Carbon Project (www.globalcarbonproject.org), a joint project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, the International Human Dimension Programme on Global Environmental Change, the World Climate Research Programme and Diversitas. J.G.C. thanks the support of the Australian Climate Change Science Program. C.D.J. was supported by the Joint UK Department of Energy & Climate Change and the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). G.P.P. and R.M.A thank the support of the Norwegian Research Council (236296). Y.Y. and A.S. acknowledge that GCP Tsukuba office activities are supported by Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies. F.K. acknowledges support from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Tropical Flagship Initiative. M.T. acknowledges the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea under the GEMINA project. C.L.Q. thanks the support of UK's Natural Environment Research Council (NE/103002X/1). R.B.J. acknowledges the US Department of Agriculture (AFRI #2012-00857).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the planning of the paper. S.F. led the work together with J.G.C. and prepared Fig. 2 including description of the framework benefiting from discussions with all authors. G.P.P., R.M.A. and M.T. prepared Fig. 1 and/or provided the associated analysis. All authors contributed to writing the Commentary, providing comments to the framework and input in terms of numbers and references backing the analysis.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuss, S., Canadell, J., Peters, G. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Clim Change 4, 850–853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392
This article is cited by
-
Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios
Nature Energy (2022)
-
Mapping county-level vulnerability to the energy transition in US fossil fuel communities
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security
Nature Food (2022)
-
Delayed use of bioenergy crops might threaten climate and food security
Nature (2022)
-
Declining crop yields limit the potential of bioenergy
Nature (2022)