Commentary | Published:

Climate science reconsidered

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 745746 (2014) | Download Citation

There is a gap between the current role of the climate science community and the needs of society. Closing this gap represents a necessary but insufficient step towards improved public discourse and more constructive policy formulation on climate change.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Time for Change? Climate Science Reconsidered (Report of the UCL Policy Commission on Communicating Climate Science, 2014).

  2. 2.

    Science 279, 491–497 (1998).

  3. 3.

    The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  4. 4.

    Soc. Stud. Sci. 9, 349–375 (1979).

  5. 5.

    The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, 1962).

  6. 6.

    The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality (Routeledge, 1994).

  7. 7.

    & Nature Clim. Change 4, 743–745 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Why We Disagree About Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

  9. 9.

Download references

Author information


  1. Chris Rapley is in the Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

    • Chris Rapley
  2. Kris De Meyer is in the Department of Informatics, Kings College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK

    • Kris De Meyer


  1. Search for Chris Rapley in:

  2. Search for Kris De Meyer in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Rapley.

About this article

Publication history



Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing