Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Response of El Niño sea surface temperature variability to greenhouse warming


The destructive environmental and socio-economic impacts of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation1,2 (ENSO) demand an improved understanding of how ENSO will change under future greenhouse warming. Robust projected changes in certain aspects of ENSO have been recently established3,4,5. However, there is as yet no consensus on the change in the magnitude of the associated sea surface temperature (SST) variability6,7,8, commonly used to represent ENSO amplitude1,6, despite its strong effects on marine ecosystems and rainfall worldwide1,2,3,4,9. Here we show that the response of ENSO SST amplitude is time-varying, with an increasing trend in ENSO amplitude before 2040, followed by a decreasing trend thereafter. We attribute the previous lack of consensus to an expectation that the trend in ENSO amplitude over the entire twenty-first century is unidirectional, and to unrealistic model dynamics of tropical Pacific SST variability. We examine these complex processes across 22 models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) database10, forced under historical and greenhouse warming conditions. The nine most realistic models identified show a strong consensus on the time-varying response and reveal that the non-unidirectional behaviour is linked to a longitudinal difference in the surface warming rate across the Indo-Pacific basin. Our results carry important implications for climate projections and climate adaptation pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Observed ENSO amplitude and topical Pacific zonal winds.
Figure 2: Time variation of simulated ENSO amplitude and ENSO stability.
Figure 3: Factors driving a coupling intensity between anomalous thermocline slope and surface wind in the equatorial Pacific.
Figure 4: Time-varying MME linear trends.


  1. McPhaden, M. J., Zebiak, S. E. & Glantz, M. H. ENSO as an integrating concept in earth science. Science 314, 1740–1745 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Philander, S. G. H. Anomalous El Niño of 1982–83. Nature 305, 16 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, W. et al. Increasing frequency of El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nature Clim. Change 4, 111–116 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Power, S., Delage, F., Chung, C., Kociuba, G. & Keay, K. Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability. Nature 502, 541–545 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Santoso, A. et al. Late-twentieth-century emergence of the El Niño propagation asymmetry and future projections. Nature 504, 126–130 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guilyardi, E. El Niño-mean state-seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Clim. Dynam. 26, 329–348 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, M. et al. The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño. Nature Geosci. 3, 391–397 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevenson, S. L. Significant changes to ENSO strength and impacts in the twenty-first century: Results from CMIP5. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L17703 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chavez, F. P., Ryan, J., Lluch-Cota, S. E. & Ñiquen, M. From anchovies to sardines and back: Multidecadal change in the Pacific Ocean. Science 299, 217–221 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experimental design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rayner, N. A. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature sea ice, and night marine air temperature since then late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4407 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, T. M., Reynolds, R. W., Peterson, T. C. & Lawrimore, J. Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J. Clim. 21, 2283–2296 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, D-Z. El Niño: A coupled response to radiative heating? Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2031–2034 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fedorov, A. V. & Philander, G. Is El Niño changing? Science 288, 1997–2002 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Oldenborgh, G. J., Philip, S. Y. & Collins, M. El Niño in a changing climate: A multi-model study. Ocean Sci. 1, 81–95 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McPhaden, M. J., Lee, T. & McClurg, D. El Niño and its relationship to changing background conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L15709 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S. T. & Jin, F-F. An ENSO stability analysis. Part I: Results from a hybrid coupled model. Clim. Dynam. 36, 1593–1607 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tokinaga, H. & Xie, S-P. Wave- and Anemometer-based sea surface wind (WASWind) for climate change analysis. J. Clim. 24, 267–285 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Large, W. G. & Yeager, S. G. The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set. Clim. Dynam. 33, 341–364 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luebbecke, J. & McPhaden, M. J. Assessing the 21st century shift in ENSO variability in terms of the Bjerknes stability index. J. Clim. 27, 2577–2587 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jin, F-F. An equatorial ocean recharge paradigm for ENSO. Part I: Conceptual model. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 811–829 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. An, S-I. & Jin, F-F. Nonlinearity and asymmetry of ENSO. J. Clim. 17, 2399–2412 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin, F-F., Kim, S. T. & Bejarano, L. A coupled-stability index of ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L23708 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, S. T., Cai, W., Jin, F-F. & Yu, J-Y. ENSO stability in coupled climate models and its association with mean state. Clim. Dynam. 42, 3313–3321 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ren, H. & Jin, F-F. Recharge oscillator mechanisms in two types of ENSO. J. Clim. 26, 6506–6523 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, B., Wu, R. & Fu, X. Pacific-East Asian teleconnection: How does ENSO affect East Asian climate? J. Clim. 13, 1517–1536 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vecchi, G. & Soden, B. Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J. Clim. 20, 4316–4340 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xie, S-P. et al. Global warming pattern formation: Sea surface temperature and rainfall. J. Clim. 23, 966–986 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Carton, J. A. & Giese, B. S. A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon. Weath. Rev. 136, 2999–3017 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Uppala, S. M. et al. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 2961–3012 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. S.T.K. is supported by CSIRO Office of Chief Executive and Wealth from Oceans Flagship, and W.C. is supported by the Australian Climate Change Science Program, and a CSIRO Office of Chief Executive Science Leader award. A.S. is supported by the Australian Research Council. S-I.A. is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2009-C1AAA001-2009-0093042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.T.K. and W.C. designed the study. S.T.K. performed the data analysis. S.T.K. and W.C. wrote the initial manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to improvement of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seon Tae Kim or Wenju Cai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S., Cai, W., Jin, FF. et al. Response of El Niño sea surface temperature variability to greenhouse warming. Nature Clim Change 4, 786–790 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing