Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 25 September 2014

This article has been updated

Abstract

Disturbances from wind, bark beetles and wildfires have increased in Europe’s forests throughout the twentieth century1. Climatic changes were identified as a key driver behind this increase2, yet how the expected continuation of climate change will affect Europe’s forest disturbance regime remains unresolved. Increasing disturbances could strongly impact the forest carbon budget3,4, and are suggested to contribute to the recently observed carbon sink saturation in Europe’s forests5. Here we show that forest disturbance damage in Europe has continued to increase in the first decade of the twenty-first century. On the basis of an ensemble of climate change scenarios we find that damage from wind, bark beetles and forest fires is likely to increase further in coming decades, and estimate the rate of increase to be +0.91 × 106 m3 of timber per year until 2030. We show that this intensification can offset the effect of management strategies aiming to increase the forest carbon sink, and calculate the disturbance-related reduction of the carbon storage potential in Europe’s forests to be 503.4 Tg C in 2021–2030. Our results highlight the considerable carbon cycle feedbacks of changing disturbance regimes, and underline that future forest policy and management will require a stronger focus on disturbance risk and resilience.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Forest disturbance damage in Europe 1971–2030.
Figure 2: Disturbance percentage in Europe’s forest ecosystems.

Change history

  • 04 September 2014

    In the version of this Letter previously published, the value given for net ecosystem productivity was incorrect, and should have read 99.2 Tg C yr–1; this has no impact on the reported results. These corrections have been made in the online versions of the Letter.

  • 08 August 2014

    In the version of this Letter originally published, the received date was incorrect and should have read 14 October 2013. This error has now been corrected in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. 1

    Schelhaas, M-J., Nabuurs, G. & Schuck, A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 1620–1633 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M-J. & Lexer, M. J. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2842–2852 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Kurz, W. A. et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452, 987–990 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Le Page, Y. et al. Sensitivity of climate mitigation strategies to natural disturbances. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 015018 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Nabuurs, G-J. et al. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nature Clim. Change 3, 792–796 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Franklin, J. F. et al. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecol. Manag. 155, 399–423 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Gutschick, V. P. & BassiriRad, H. Extreme events as shaping physiology, ecology, and evolution of plants: Toward a unified definition and evaluation of their consequences. New Phytol. 160, 21–42 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R. & Swetnam, T. W. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Soja, A. J. et al. Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations. Glob. Planet. Change 56, 274–296 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Raffa, K. et al. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: The dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 58, 501–518 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Lausch, A., Heurich, M. & Fahse, L. Spatio-temporal infestation patterns of Ips typographus (L.) in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. Ecol. Indic. 31, 73–81 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Seidl, R., Schelhaas, M-J., Lindner, M. & Lexer, M. J. Modelling bark beetle disturbances in a large scale forest scenario model to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptive management strategies. Reg. Environ. Change 9, 101–119 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Westerling, A. L., Turner, M. G., Smithwick, E. A. H., Romme, W. H. & Ryan, M. G. Continued warming could transform Greater Yellowstone fire regimes by mid-21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13165–13170 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Lindner, M. et al. Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecol. Manag. 259, 698–709 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Stephens, S. L. et al. Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 342, 41–42 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Körner, C. Slow in, rapid out–carbon flux studies and Kyoto targets. Science 300, 1242–1243 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    UNECE, & FAO, The European Forest Sector Outlook Study II 2010–2030 107 (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2011).

  18. 18

    Weng, E. et al. Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: A general theoretical model. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G03014 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lindroth, A. et al. Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 346–355 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Jäger, D. & Lexer, M. J. Impact of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256, 209–220 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Vilén, T. & Fernandes, P. M. Forest fires in Mediterranean countries: CO2 emissions and mitigation possibilities through prescribed burning. Environ. Manag. 48, 558–567 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Metsaranta, J. M., Dymond, C. C., Kurz, W. A. & Spittlehouse, D. L. Uncertainty of 21st century growing stocks and GHG balance of forests in British Columbia, Canada resulting from potential climate change impacts on ecosystem processes. Forest Ecol. Manag. 262, 827–837 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Seidl, R. et al. Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: A review. Ecol. Model. 222, 903–924 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Temperli, C., Bugmann, H. & Elkin, C. Cross-scale interactions among bark beetles, climate change, and wind disturbances: A landscape modeling approach. Ecol. Monogr. 83, 383–402 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Gardiner, B. et al. Destructive Storms in European Forests: Past and Forthcoming Impacts 138 (EFIATLANTIC, European Forest Institute, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M-J., Nabuurs, G-J. & Zimmermann, N. E. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nature Clim. Change 3, 203–207 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Mikkelson, K. M., Dickenson, E. R. V., Maxwell, R. M., McCray, J. E. & Sharp, J. O. Water-quality impacts from climate-induced forest die-off. Nature Clim. Change 3, 218–222 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Verkerk, P. J., Anttila, P., Eggers, J., Lindner, M. & Asikainen, A. The realisable potential supply of woody biomass from forests in the European Union. Forest Ecol. Manag. 261, 2007–2015 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Database on Forest Disturbances in Europe (DFDE) (European Forest Institute, 2013); http://www.efi.int/databases/dfde

  30. 30

    Reyer, C. et al. Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide. Ann. Forest Sci. 71, 211–225 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.S. and W.R. acknowledge financial support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project no.: P25503-B16. R.S. has received further support from a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (grant agreement no. PCIG12-GA-2012-334104) and the collaborative project FORMIT (grant agreement no. 311970), both funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration. M-J.S. acknowledges financial support from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme projects MOTIVE (grant agreement no. 226544) and GHG-Europe (grant agreement no. 244122), and has received further support from the strategic research program KBIV ‘Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions’, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. P.J.V. acknowledges support from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme collaborative projects Volante (grant agreement no. 265104) and GHG-Europe (grant agreement no. 244122). We are grateful to C. Reyer and P. Lasch for providing data on climate scenarios and growth responses to the study. We furthermore acknowledge G. Hengeveld for support in data processing, and G-J. Nabuurs for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S. initiated the research and designed the study, conducted the analysis, and wrote the paper. M-J.S. contributed to study design, compiled the observational disturbance data, conducted the analysis of forest scenarios, and contributed to writing the paper. W.R. conducted the analysis of carbon effects and contributed to writing the paper. P.J.V. conducted the analysis of forest policy scenarios and contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupert Seidl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seidl, R., Schelhaas, MJ., Rammer, W. et al. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nature Clim Change 4, 806–810 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2318

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing