Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Changing the resilience paradigm

Resilience management goes beyond risk management to address the complexities of large integrated systems and the uncertainty of future threats, especially those associated with climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: A resilience management framework includes risk analysis as a central component.
Figure 2: Schematic representations of changes in critical functionality over time show the interplay of risk and resilience in a system's performance during an adverse event.

References

  1. IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 582 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

  2. Levermann, A. Nature 506, 27–29 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linkov, I. et al. Env. Sci. Tech. 47, 10108–10110 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Research Council Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative (The National Academies Press, 2012).

  5. Park, J., Seager, T. P., Rao, P. C. S., Convertino, M. & Linkov, I. Risk Analysis 33, 356–367 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Linkov, I. et al. Environ. Syst. Decisions 33, 471–476 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roege, P. et al. Energy Policy (in the press).

  8. Dauphiné, A. & Provitolo. D. Annales de Géographie 654, 115–125 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambert, J. H., Tsang, J. & Thekdi, S. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. J. Infrastr. Syst. 19, 384–394 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bridges, T. et al. Coastal risk reduction and resilience (US Army Corps of Engineers, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollnagel, E. & Fujita, Y. Nuc. Eng. Tech. 45, 1–8 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Commission on Environment and Development Our common future (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper resulted from discussions at a workshop on the use of risk and resilience assessment methodologies in guiding policy development, held at the Embassy of Canada in Berlin, Germany on 4 February 2014. Partial financial support for the workshop was provided by grant W911NF-13-1-0168 to RNC Conseil, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. Additional funding was provided by the German National Academy of Technology and Engineering (Acatech), the Helmholtz Association, the Embassy of Canada and the Society for Risk Analysis. Permission was granted by the USACE Chief of Engineers to publish this material. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the individual authors and not those of the US Army or other sponsor organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Linkov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F. et al. Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Clim Change 4, 407–409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2227

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2227

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing