Significant progress has been made in our understanding of species-level responses to climate change, but upscaling to entire ecosystems remains a challenge1,2. This task is particularly urgent in the Arctic, where global warming is most pronounced3. Here we report the results of an international collaboration on the direct and indirect effects of climate on the functioning of Arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Our data from seven terrestrial food webs spread along a wide range of latitudes (∼1,500 km) and climates (Δ mean July temperature = 8.5 °C) across the circumpolar world show the effects of climate on tundra primary production, food-web structure and species interaction strength. The intensity of predation on lower trophic levels increased significantly with temperature, at approximately 4.5% per °C. Temperature also affected trophic interactions through an indirect effect on food-web structure (that is, diversity and number of interactions). Herbivore body size was a major determinant of predator–prey interactions, as interaction strength was positively related to the predator–prey size ratio, with large herbivores mostly escaping predation. There is potential for climate warming to cause a switch from bottom-up to top-down regulation of herbivores. These results are critical to resolving the debate on the regulation of tundra and other terrestrial ecosystems exposed to global change4,5,6.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 13 September 2023
Applied Network Science Open Access 06 February 2023
Polar Biology Open Access 17 May 2021
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Loreau, M. From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis Vol 46 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010).
Woodward, G. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research: Ecological Networks Vol 42 (ed Woodward, G.) 71–138 (Elsevier Academic, 2010).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis 1–18 (eds Soloman, S. et. al) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Hunter, M. D. & Price, P. W. Playing chutes and ladders: Heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73, 724–732 (1992).
Oksanen, L. & Oksanen, T. The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. Am. Nat. 155, 703–723 (2000).
Gauthier, G., Berteaux, D., Krebs, C. J. & Reid, D. Arctic lemmings are not simply food limited—A comment on Oksanen et al. Evol. Ecol. Res. 11, 483–484 (2009).
Duffy, J. E. et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: Incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10, 522–538 (2007).
Bergengren, J., Waliser, D. & Yung, Y. Ecological sensitivity: A biospheric view of climate change. Climatic Change 107, 433–457 (2011).
Montoya, J. M. & Raffaelli, D. Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 365, 2013–2018 (2010).
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789 (2004).
Yodzis, P. & Innes, S. Body size and consumer-ressource dynamics. Am. Nat. 139, 1151–1175 (1992).
Wootton, J. T. & Emmerson, M. Measurement of interaction strength in nature. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 419–444 (2005).
Gaston, K. & Blackburn, T. Pattern and Process in Macroecology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2008).
Rall, B. C., Vucic-Pestic, O., Ehnes, R. B., Emmerson, M. & Brose, U. Temperature, predator–prey interaction strength and population stability. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2145–2157 (2010).
Gilg, O. et al. Climate change and the ecology and evolution of Arctic vertebrates. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1249, 166–190 (2012).
Legagneux, P. et al. Disentangling trophic relationships in a high Arctic tundra ecosystem through food web modeling. Ecology 93, 1707–1716 (2012).
Purves, D. et al. Ecosystems: Time to model all life on Earth. Nature 493, 295–297 (2013).
Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3–35 (2005).
Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300, 1560–1563 (2003).
Sturm, M., Racine, C. & Tape, K. Climate change—Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411, 546–547 (2001).
White, E. P., Ernest, S. K. M., Kerkhoff, A. J. & Enquist, B. J. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 323–330 (2007).
Elmendorf, S. C. et al. Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: Heterogeneity over space and time. Ecol. Lett. 15, 164–175 (2012).
Hopcraft, J. G. C., Olff, H. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Herbivores, resources and risks: Alternating regulation along primary environmental gradients in savannas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 119–128 (2010).
Hillebrand, H. et al. Herbivore metabolism and stoichiometry each constrain herbivory at different organizational scales across ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 12, 516–527 (2009).
McKinnon, L. et al. Lower predation risk for migratory birds at high latitudes. Science 327, 326–327 (2010).
Brose, U. et al. Climate change in size-structured ecosystems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367, 2903–2912 (2012).
De Ruiter, P. C., Neutel, A-M. & Moore, J. C. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 269, 1257–1260 (1995).
Walker, D. A. et al. The circumpolar Arctic vegetation map. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 267–282 (2005).
Christensen, V. & Pauly, D. Ecopath-II—A software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics. Ecol. Model. 61, 169–185 (1992).
May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems Vol. 265 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1973).
We are grateful to all field assistants, students and researchers who collaborated on these IPY projects. We thank J. Lefebvre for sharing her knowledge on Ellesmere Island and G. Yannic for moral support. All agencies that funded this work are listed at http://www.cen.ulaval.ca/arcticwolves/en_partners.htm and at http://www.arctic-predators.uit.no/. P.L. was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council EnviroNorth post-doc fellowship.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Legagneux, P., Gauthier, G., Lecomte, N. et al. Arctic ecosystem structure and functioning shaped by climate and herbivore body size. Nature Clim Change 4, 379–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2168
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2023)
Applied Network Science (2023)
Polar Biology (2021)
Nature Climate Change (2019)