Letter | Published:

A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 201205 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report largely depends on simulations, predictions and projections by climate models1. Most models, however, have deficiencies and biases that raise large uncertainties in their products. Over the past several decades, a tremendous effort has been made to improve model performance in the simulation of special regions and aspects of the climate system2,3,4. Here we show that biases or errors in special regions can be linked with others at far away locations. We find in 22 climate models that regional sea surface temperature (SST) biases are commonly linked with the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), which is characterized by the northward flow in the upper ocean and returning southward flow in the deep ocean. A simulated weak AMOC is associated with cold biases in the entire Northern Hemisphere with an atmospheric pattern that resembles the Northern Hemisphere annular mode. The AMOC weakening is also associated with a strengthening of Antarctic Bottom Water formation and warm SST biases in the Southern Ocean. It is also shown that cold biases in the tropical North Atlantic and West African/Indian monsoon regions during the warm season in the Northern Hemisphere have interhemispheric links with warm SST biases in the tropical southeastern Pacific and Atlantic, respectively. The results suggest that improving the simulation of regional processes may not suffice for overall better model performance, as the effects of remote biases may override them.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

  2. 2.

    & Origins of tropical-wide SST biases in CMIP multi-model ensembles. Geophys. Res. Lett 39, L22703 (2012).

  3. 3.

    et al. Understanding El Niño in ocean-atmosphere general circulation models: Progress and challenges. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 90, 325–340 (2009).

  4. 4.

    et al. The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific and El Niño. Nature Geosci. 3, 391–397 (2010).

  5. 5.

    et al. Ocean-cloud-atmosphere-land interactions in the Southeastern Pacific: The VOCALS Program. Bull. Am. Met. Soc. (in the press, 2013).

  6. 6.

    et al. The seasonal cycle over the tropical Pacific in general circulation models. Mon. Weath. Rev 123, 2825–2838 (1995).

  7. 7.

    , & Evolution of model systematic errors in the tropical Atlantic basin from the NCEP coupled hindcasts. Clim. Dynam. 28, 661–682 (2007).

  8. 8.

    , , & Heat balance and eddies in the Peru–Chile current system. Clim. Dynam. 39, 509–529 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. STOIC: a study of coupled model climatology and variability in tropical ocean regions. Clim. Dynam. 18, 403–420 (2002).

  10. 10.

    & Link between the double-Intertropical Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.1213302110PNAS (2013).

  11. 11.

    & Estimated decadal changes in the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and heat flux 1993 2004. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 2012–2024 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Coherent surface-subsurface fingerprint of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20705 (2008).

  13. 13.

    , , , & A signature of persistent natural thermohaline circulation cycles in observed climate. Geophys. Res. Lett 32, L20708 (2005).

  14. 14.

    , & Sahel rainfall and worldwide sea temperatures, 1901–85. Nature 320, 602–607 (1986).

  15. 15.

    & Observed and simulated multidecadal variability in the Northern Hemisphere. Clim. Dynam. 16, 661–676 (2000).

  16. 16.

    , & Can the Atlantic Ocean drive the observed multidecadal variability in Northern Hemisphere mean temperature?. Geophys. Res. Lett 34, L02709 (2007).

  17. 17.

    et al. Investigating the causes of the response of the thermohaline circulation to past and future climate changes. J. Clim. 19, 1365–1387 (2006).

  18. 18.

    , , & Global teleconnections in response to a shutdown of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. J. Clim. 21, 3002–3019 (2008).

  19. 19.

    & Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: Month-to-month variability. J. Clim. 13, 1000–1016 (2000).

  20. 20.

    & Impact of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on North Pacific climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L23708 (2007).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Externally forced and internally generated decadal climate variability associated with the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation. J. Clim. 26, 7298–7310 (2013).

  22. 22.

    et al. Sensitivity of the North Atlantic Ocean circulation to an abrupt change in the Nordic Sea overflow in a high resolution global coupled climate model. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C12024 (2011).

  23. 23.

    Paleocean circulation during the last deglaciation: a bipolar seesaw?. Paleoceanography 13, 119–121 (1998).

  24. 24.

    , , & Meltwater pulse 1A from Antarctic as a trigger of the Bølling-Allerød warm interval. Science 299, 1709–1713 (2003).

  25. 25.

    & Global teleconnections in response to freshening over the Antarctic Ocean. J. Clim. 24, 1071–1088 (2011).

  26. 26.

    , & Contrasting the tropical response to zonally asymmetric extratropical and tropical thermal forcing. Clim. Dynam. 10.1007/s00382-013-1863-0 (2013).

  27. 27.

    , , & Influences of the Atlantic warm pool on Western Hemisphere summer rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes. J. Clim. 19, 3011–3028 (2006).

  28. 28.

    , & Inter-hemispheric influence of the Atlantic warm pool on the southeastern Pacific. J. Clim. 23, 404–418 (2010).

  29. 29.

    , & What determines the position and intensity of the South Atlantic anticyclone in austral winter?—An AGCM study. J. Clim. 21, 214–229 (2008).

  30. 30.

    & Sensitivity of Atlantic meridional overturning circulation variability to parameterized Nordic Sea overflows in CCSM4. J. Clim. 25, 2077–2103 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

R. Lumpkin served as an internal reviewer of the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML). This work was supported by grants from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office, National Science Foundation, the base funding of NOAA/AOML, China National Global Change Major Research Project (2013CB956201), and China National Science Foundation Key Project (41130859). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Florida 33149, USA

    • Chunzai Wang
    • , Liping Zhang
    •  & Sang-Ki Lee
  2. Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33149, USA

    • Liping Zhang
    •  & Sang-Ki Lee
  3. Physical Oceanography Laboratory/Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center for Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

    • Lixin Wu
  4. University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

    • Carlos R. Mechoso

Authors

  1. Search for Chunzai Wang in:

  2. Search for Liping Zhang in:

  3. Search for Sang-Ki Lee in:

  4. Search for Lixin Wu in:

  5. Search for Carlos R. Mechoso in:

Contributions

C.W. and L.Z. designed the study. L.Z. made all plots and analyses. C.W. wrote the paper and C.R.M. contributed significantly to the text. All co-authors helped interpret the analyses and also edited the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunzai Wang or Liping Zhang.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2118

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing