Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 186–189 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Humans use fossil fuels in various activities tied to economic development, leading to increases in carbon emissions1,2,3, and economic development is widely recognized as a pathway to improving human well-being. Strategies for effective sustainability efforts require reducing the carbon intensity of human well-being (CIWB): the level of anthropogenic carbon emissions per unit of human well-being4,5,6,7. Here I examine how the effect of economic development on CIWB has changed since 1970 for 106 countries in multiple regional samples throughout the world. I find that early in this time period, increased development led to a reduction in CIWB for nations in Africa, but in recent decades the relationship has changed, becoming less sustainable. For nations in Asia and South and Central America, I find that development increases CIWB, and increasingly so throughout the 40-year period of study. The effect of development on CIWB for nations in the combined regions of North America, Europe and Oceania has remained positive, relatively larger than in other regions, and stable through time. Although future economic growth will probably improve human well-being throughout the world8, this research suggests that it will also cost an increasing amount of carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The CIWB for eight nations, 1970–2009.
Figure 2: GDP per capita for eight nations, 1970–2009.
Figure 3: Elasticity coefficients for the estimated effect of GDP per capita on the CIWB.

References

  1. 1

    Podobnik, B. Global Energy Shifts: Fostering Sustainability in a Turbulent Age (Temple Univ. Press, (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R. & Meyer, L. A. (eds) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  3. 3

    United States National Research Council, Advancing the Science on Climate Change (National Academies Press, (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Dietz, T., Rosa, E. & York, R. Environmentally efficient well-being: Is there a Kuznets curve?. Appl. Geogr. 32, 21–28 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Dietz, T., Rosa, E. & York, R. Efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecol. Rev. 16, 114–123 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Knight, K. & Rosa, E. The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross national analysis. Soc. Sci. Res. 40, 931–949 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Steinberger, J. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econom. 70, 425–433 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Brady, D., Kaya, Y. & Beckfield, J. Reassessing the effect of economic growth on well-being in less-developed countries, 1980–2003. Stud. Comparative Int. Dev. 42, 1–35 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Rosa, E. & Dietz, T. Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Clim. Change 2, 581–586 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Jorgenson, A. K. & Clark, B. Are the economy and the environment decoupling? A comparative international study, 1960–2005. Am. J. Soc. 118, 1–44 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    York, R. Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nature Clim. Change 2, 762–764 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    McMichael, P. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective (Sage, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Mazur, A. & Rosa, E. Energy and life-style: Massive energy consumption may not be necessary to maintain current living standards in America. Science 186, 207–610 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Rudel, T. Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the Late Twentieth Century (Columbia Univ. Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Jorgenson, A. K., Rice, J. & Clark, B. Assessing temporal and regional differences in the relationships between infant and child mortality and urban slum prevalence in less-developed countries, 1990–2005. Urban Stud. 49, 3495–3512 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Jorgenson, A. K. & Clark, B. The relationship between national-level carbon dioxide emissions and population size: An assessment of regional and temporal variation, 1960–2005. PLoS ONE 8, e57107 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Allison, P. Fixed Effects Regression Models (Sage, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Roberts, J. T. & Parks, B. A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy (MIT Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Steinberger, J., Roberts, T., Peters, G. & Baiocchi, G. Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade. Nature Clim. Change 2, 81–85 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Peters, G. et al. Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Nature Clim. Change 2, 2–4 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    World Development Indicators. Accessed 2 June (World Bank, 2013);http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators

  22. 22

    Jorgenson, A. K., Alekseyko, A. & Giedraitis, V. Energy consumption, human well-being and economic development in central and eastern Europe: A cautionary tale of sustainability. Energy Policy 66, 419–427 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Rudel, T. K. et al. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 23–31 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Beck, N. & Katz, J. What to do (and not do) with time-series cross-section data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89, 634–647 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks B. Clark, J. Givens, D. Grant, W. Longhofer, M. Mahutga and T. Rotolo for helpful comments.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City Utah 84112, USA

    Andrew K. Jorgenson

Authors
  1. Andrew K. Jorgenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K.J. designed the research, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew K. Jorgenson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jorgenson, A. Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being. Nature Clim Change 4, 186–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2110

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing