Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 117–121 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Over the past 40 years Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica has thinned at an accelerating rate1,2,3, so that at present it is the largest single contributor to sea-level rise in Antarctica4. In recent years, the grounding line, which separates the grounded ice sheet from the floating ice shelf, has retreated by tens of kilometres5. At present, the grounding line is crossing a retrograde bedrock slope that lies well below sea level, raising the possibility that the glacier is susceptible to the marine ice-sheet instability mechanism6,7,8. Here, using three state-of-the-art ice-flow models9,10,11, we show that Pine Island Glacier’s grounding line is probably engaged in an unstable 40 km retreat. The associated mass loss increases substantially over the course of our simulations from the average value of 20 Gt yr−1 observed for the 1992–2011 period4, up to and above 100 Gt yr−1, equivalent to 3.5–10 mm eustatic sea-level rise over the following 20 years. Mass loss remains elevated from then on, ranging from 60 to 120 Gt yr−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: PIG location and geometry.
Figure 2: Melting experiments.
Figure 3: Reverse experiments.
Figure 4: Integrated contribution to SLR for melting experiments that produces a grounding line retreat.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bindschadler, R. History of lower Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, from Landsat imagery. J. Glaciol. 48, 536–544 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rignot, E. et al. Recent antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling. Nature Geosci. 1, 106–110 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wingham, D., Wallis, D. & Shepherd, A. Spatial and temporal evolution of Pine Island Glacier thinning, 1995–2006. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L17501 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shepherd, A. et al. A reconciled estimate of ice-sheet mass balance. Science 338, 1183–1189 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Park, J., Gourmelen, N., Shepherd, A., Kim, S., Vaughan, D. & Wingham, D. Sustained retreat of Pine Island Glacier. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2137–2142 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoof, C. Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: Steady states, stability, and hysteresis. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F03S28 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Durand, G., Gagliardini, O., de Fleurian, B., Zwinger, T. & Le Meur, E. Marine ice sheet dynamics: Hysteresis and neutral equilibrium. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F03009 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Holland, D. M. Sensitivity of 21st century sea level to ocean-induced thinning of Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20502 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Favier, L., Gagliardini, O., Durand, G. & Zwinger, T. A three-dimensional full stokes model of the grounding line dynamics: Effect of a pinning point beneath the ice shelf. Cryosphere 6, 101–112 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornford, S. et al. Adaptive mesh, finite volume modeling of marine ice sheets. J. Comput. Phys. 232, 529–549 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gudmundsson, G., Krug, J., Durand, G., Favier, L. & Gagliardini, O. The stability of grounding lines on retrograde slopes. The Cryosphere 6, 1497–1505 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pritchard, H. et al. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature 484, 502–505 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs, S., Jenkins, A., Giulivi, C. & Dutrieux, P. Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf. Nature Geosci. 4, 519–523 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaughan, D. et al. New boundary conditions for the West Antarctic ice sheet: Subglacial topography beneath Pine Island Glacier. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L09501 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gladstone, R. M. et al. Calibrated prediction of Pine Island Glacier retreat during the 21st and 22nd centuries with a coupled flowline model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333, 191–199 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pattyn, F. et al. Grounding-line migration in plan-view ice-sheets models: Results of the ice2sea mismip3d intercomparison. J. Glaciol. 59 (215), 410–422 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gillet-Chaulet, F. et al. Greenland ice sheet contribution to sea-level rise from a new-generation ice-sheet model. Cryosphere 6, 1561–1576 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van de Berg, W., van den Broeke, M., Reijmer, C. & van Meijgaard, E. Reassessment of the antarctic surface mass balance using calibrated output of a regional atmospheric climate model. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D11104 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dutrieux, P. et al. Pine Island Glacier ice shelf melt distributed at kilometre scales. The Cryosphere 7, 1543–1555 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg, D. et al. Investigation of land ice–ocean interaction with a fully coupled ice-ocean model: 1. Model description and behaviour. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F02037 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Payne, A. J. et al. Numerical modeling of ocean–ice interactions under Pine Island Bay’s ice shelf. J. Geophys. Res. 112, C10019 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoof, C. & Hindmarsh, R. Thin-film flows with wall slip: An asymptotic analysis of higher order glacier flow models. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 63, 73–114 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacAyeal, D. Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment-theory and application to ice stream B, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 4071–4087 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Le Brocq, A., Payne, A. & Vieli, A. An improved Antarctic dataset for high resolution numerical ice sheet models (ALBMAP v1). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2, 247–260 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pattyn, F. Antarctic subglacial conditions inferred from a hybrid ice sheet/ice stream model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 295, 451–461 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Ice flow of the Antarctic ice sheet. Science 333, 1427–1430 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Timmermann, R. et al. A consistent data set of Antarctic ice sheet topography, cavity geometry, and global bathymetry. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2, 261–273 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ligtenberg, S., Helsen, M. & van den Broeke, M. An improved semi- empirical model for the densification of Antarctic firn. The Cryosphere 5, 809–819 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Joughin, I. et al. Basal conditions for Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers, West Antarctica, determined using satellite and airborne data. J. Glaciol. 55, 245–257 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lenaerts, J., van den Broeke, M., van de Berg, W. J., van Meijgaard, E. & Kuipers Munneke, P. A new, high-resolution surface mass balance map of Antarctica (1979–2010) based on regional atmospheric climate modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04501 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to T. Flament for observations of surface elevation change, A. Shepherd and N. Gourmelen for recent location of the grounding line and P. Dutrieux for discussions on sub-ice-shelf melting. Elmer/Ice computations were carried out using HPC resources from GENCI-CINES (grant/2012016066/) and from the Service Commun de Calcul Intensif de l’Observatoire de Grenoble (SCCI). BISICLES calculations were carried out on the University of Bristol’s Blue Crystal Phase 2 supercomputer and the code is jointly developed with D. F. Martin at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California, USA, with financial support provided by the US Department of Energy and the UK Natural Environment Research Council. This work was supported by financial support from the ice2sea program from the European Union 7th Framework Programme, grant number 226375, ice2sea contribution number 157 and by NERC grant number NE/H02333X/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS, LGGE, Grenoble F-38041, France

    L. Favier, G. Durand, O. Gagliardini & F. Gillet-Chaulet

  2. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LGGE, Grenoble F-38041, France

    L. Favier, G. Durand, O. Gagliardini & F. Gillet-Chaulet

  3. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK

    S. L. Cornford & A. J. Payne

  4. British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK

    G. H. Gudmundsson

  5. CAREERI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

    G. H. Gudmundsson

  6. Institut Universitaire de France, 103 bd St Michel, 75005 Paris, France

    O. Gagliardini

  7. CSC-IT Center for Science Ltd, PO Box 405, FIN-02101 Espoo, Finland

    T. Zwinger

  8. Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK

    A. M. Le Brocq

Authors
  1. L. Favier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Durand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. L. Cornford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. H. Gudmundsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. Gagliardini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Gillet-Chaulet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Zwinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. J. Payne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. M. Le Brocq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.F. and G.D. designed the experiments. L.F. did the numerical modelling with Elmer/Ice, S.L.C. with BISICLES and G.H.G. with Úa. O.G., F.G-C. and T.Z. contributed to the set-up of Elmer/Ice, A.J.P. contributed to BISICLES. A.M.L.B. provided the high-resolution topographic input data set that has been used by Elmer/Ice and BISICLES. L.F., G.D. and S.L.C. led the writing of the manuscript, which has been improved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Durand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favier, L., Durand, G., Cornford, S. et al. Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability. Nature Clim Change 4, 117–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2094

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing