Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

How warm days increase belief in global warming

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 143–147 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Climate change judgements can depend on whether today seems warmer or colder than usual, termed the local warming effect. Although previous research has demonstrated that this effect occurs, studies have yet to explain why or how temperature abnormalities influence global warming attitudes. A better understanding of the underlying psychology of this effect can help explain the public’s reaction to climate change and inform approaches used to communicate the phenomenon. Across five studies, we find evidence of attribute substitution, whereby individuals use less relevant but available information (for example, today’s temperature) in place of more diagnostic but less accessible information (for example, global climate change patterns) when making judgements. Moreover, we rule out alternative hypotheses involving climate change labelling and lay mental models. Ultimately, we show that present temperature abnormalities are given undue weight and lead to an overestimation of the frequency of similar past events, thereby increasing belief in and concern for global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Climate change labelling and local warming.
Figure 2: Information, recency and local warming.
Figure 3: Temperature priming and local warming.
Figure 4: Perceived PDW and local warming.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pielke, R. A. Policy history of the US global change research program: Part I. Administrative development. Glob. Environ. Change 10, 9–25 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber, E. U. & Johnson, E. J. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 53–85 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ungar, S. The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. Soc. Quart. 33, 483–501 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krosnick, J., Holbrook, A., Lowe, L. & Visser, P. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77, 7–43 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Egan, P. J. & Mullin, M. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J. Pol. 74, 796–809 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joireman, J. A., Barnes Truelove, H. & Duell, B. Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 358–367 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howe, P. D., Markowitz, E. M., Lee, T. M., Ko, C-Y & Leiserowitz, A. Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 352–356 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Risen, J. L. & Critcher, C. R. Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 777–793 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 207–232 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, E. U., Shafir, S. & Blais, A-R. Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychol. Rev. 111, 430–445 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E. & MacGregor, D. G. Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. J. Socio-Econ. 31, 329–342 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y., Johnson, E. J. & Zaval, L. Local warming: Daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychol. Sci. 22, 454–459 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarz, N. & Oyserman, D. Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. Am. J. Eval. 22, 127–160 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuman, H. & Presser, S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context (SAGE Publications, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J. & Weber, E. U. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and Query theory. Psychol. Sci. 21, 86–92 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. in Heuristics and Biases (eds Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D.) 49–81 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Leiserowitz, A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal. 25, 1433–1442 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Whitmarsh, L. What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of climate change and ‘global warming. Public Underst. Sci. 18, 401–420 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Payne, S. L. The Art of Asking Questions (Princeton Univ. Press, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Solomon, S. et al. (eds) in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  23. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. Prospect theory—analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, L. E. & Bargh, J. A. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322, 606–607 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ijzerman, H. & Semin, G. R. The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1214–1220 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mauss, I. B., Cook, C. L. & Gross, J. J. Automatic emotion regulation during anger provocation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 698–711 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber, E. U. Psychology: Seeing is believing. Nature Clim. Change 3, 312–313 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, 1–6 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T. & Gosling, S. D. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 3–5 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leiserowitz, A., Shome, D., Marx, S., Hammer, S. & Broad, K. The New York Global Warming Survey (Yale Project on Climate Change, A Columbia University/Yale University Poll, 2008).

  31. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K. & Trötschel, R. The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 1014–1027 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the NIA grant 5R01AG027934 and the NSF IGERT grant 0903551. We thank members of the Preferences as Memories Lab, the Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, J. Logg, T. Higgins, Y. Li and A. Gneezy for helpful comments; J. Westfall, C. Kim and S. Baum for technical support in running the studies; and M. Sisco and N. Lowhim for research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027, USA

    Lisa Zaval & Elke U. Weber

  2. Center for Decision Sciences, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027, USA

    Lisa Zaval, Eric J. Johnson & Elke U. Weber

  3. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York 10027, USA

    Lisa Zaval & Elke U. Weber

  4. Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA

    Elizabeth A. Keenan

Authors
  1. Lisa Zaval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth A. Keenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric J. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elke U. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.Z. and E.A.K. designed studies 1 and 3b. L.Z., E.A.K. and E.U.W. designed studies 2, 3a and 4. L.Z. and E.A.K. analysed the data. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. E.U.W. and E.J.J. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Zaval.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaval, L., Keenan, E., Johnson, E. et al. How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nature Clim Change 4, 143–147 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2093

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing