Perspective | Published:

The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 10211024 (2013) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 20 December 2013


Some recent high-profile publications have suggested that immediately reducing emissions of methane, black carbon and other short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) may contribute substantially towards the goal of limiting global warming to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Although this literature acknowledges that action on long-lived climate pollutants (LLCPs) such as CO2 is also required, it is not always appreciated that SLCP emissions in any given decade only have a significant impact on peak temperature under circumstances in which CO2 emissions are falling. Immediate action on SLCPs might potentially 'buy time' for adaptation by reducing near-term warming; however early SLCP reductions, compared with reductions in a future decade, do not buy time to delay reductions in CO2.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Update on CO2 emissions. Nature Geosci. 3, 811–812 (2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20616 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone (UNEP & WMO, 2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).

  5. 5.

    & The other climate changers: Why black carbon and ozone also matter. Foreign Aff. 88, 105–113 (2009).

  6. 6.

    et al. Costs and global impacts of black carbon abatement strategies. Tellus B 61, 625–641 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Establishment of an Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action Decision 1/CP.17 (UNFCCC, 2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. Equivalence of greenhouse-gas emissions for peak temperature limits. Nature Clim. Change 2, 535–538 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , , & Mitigation of short-lived heating components may lead to unwanted long-term consequences. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6103–6106 (2011).

  10. 10.

    , , & in Climate Science for Serving Society: Research, Modelling and Prediction Priorities (eds Asrar, G. R. & Hurrell, J. W.) 415–436 (Springer, 2012).

  11. 11.

    , & The climate threat we can beat. Foreign Aff. 91, 112–114 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Highly contrasting effects of different climate forcing agents on terrestrial ecosystem services. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 2026–2037 (2011).

  13. 13.

    & The Regime Complex for Climate Change (Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, 2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).

  15. 15.

    , , , & Cumulative carbon emissions, emissions floors and short-term rates of warming: Implications for policy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 45–66 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).

  17. 17.

    , , & Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Climatic Change 68, 281–302 (2005).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 1903–1914 (2007).

  19. 19.

    The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Climatic Change 96, 467–472 (2009).

  20. 20.

    et al. Emission pathways consistent with a 2 °C global temperature limit. Nature Clim. Change 1, 413–418 (2011).

  21. 21.

    et al. The link between a global 2 °C warming threshold and emissions in years 2020, 2050 and beyond. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 014039 (2012).

  22. 22.

    , & The record breaking global temperatures of 1997 and 1998: Evidence for an increase in the rate of global warming? Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 719–722 (2000).

  23. 23.

    Some economics of global warming. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 1–14 (1992).

  24. 24.

    et al. Global warming potentials and radiative efficiencies of halocarbons and related compounds: A comprehensive review. Rev. Geophys. 51, 300–378 (2013).

  25. 25.

    et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109, 213–241 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1–173 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) Ch. 10 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

Download references


We thank D. Shindell, J. Blackstock and R. Pierrehumbert for discussions and feedback during the progress of this research. N.H.A.B. was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council CASE studentship with the Met Office. C.H. was supported by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology science budget fund. J.A.L. was supported by the AVOID programme (DECC and Defra) under contract GA0215. S.M.S. was supported by the UK Committee on Climate Change. M.R.A. received additional support from the US NOAA and DoE through IDAG, from the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment and the Oxford Martin Programme on Resource Stewardship. N.H.A.B, C.H., J.A.L and M.R.A. acknowledge the UK Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) project TRN 307/11/2011 “Assessing the options for greenhouse gas metrics”. The views expressed herein represent those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, funders, or the UK Climate Change Committee.

Author information


  1. Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK

    • Niel H. A. Bowerman
    •  & Myles R. Allen
  2. New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6012, New Zealand

    • David J. Frame
  3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK

    • Chris Huntingford
  4. Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK

    • Jason A. Lowe
  5. Committee on Climate Change, 7 Holbein Place, London SW1W 8NR, UK

    • Stephen M. Smith
  6. Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK

    • Myles R. Allen


  1. Search for Niel H. A. Bowerman in:

  2. Search for David J. Frame in:

  3. Search for Chris Huntingford in:

  4. Search for Jason A. Lowe in:

  5. Search for Stephen M. Smith in:

  6. Search for Myles R. Allen in:


M.R.A. and N.H.A.B. designed the experiments. N.H.A.B. carried out the modelling. M.R.A., D.J.F. and N.H.A.B developed the model. All authors contributed to writing the text.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myles R. Allen.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading