Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Overestimated global warming over the past 20 years

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 767–769 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Recent observed global warming is significantly less than that simulated by climate models. This difference might be explained by some combination of errors in external forcing, model response and internal climate variability.

The evidence, therefore, indicates that the current generation of climate models (when run as a group, with the CMIP5 prescribed forcings) do not reproduce the observed global warming over the past 20 years, or the slowdown in global warming over the past fifteen years. This interpretation is supported by statistical tests of the null hypothesis that the observed and model mean trends are equal, assuming that either: (1) the models are exchangeable with each other (that is, the 'truth plus error' view); or (2) the models are exchangeable with each other and with the observations (see Supplementary Information). Differences between observed and simulated 20-year trends have p values (Supplementary Information) that drop to close to zero by 1993–2012 under assumption (1) and to 0.04 under assumption (2) (Fig. 2c). Here we note that the smaller the p value is, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. On this basis, the rarity of the 1993–2012 trend difference under assumption (1) is obvious. Under assumption (2), this implies that such an inconsistency is only expected to occur by chance once in 500 years, if 20-year periods are considered statistically independent. Similar results apply to trends for 1998–2012 (Fig. 2d). In conclusion, we reject the null hypothesis that the observed and model mean trends are equal at the 10% level.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Trends in global mean surface temperature.
Figure 2: Global mean surface temperature trends and p values.
Figure 3: Trends in global mean surface temperature and in associated natural and residual time series.

References

  1. Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Easterling, D. R. & Wehner, M. F. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L08706 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knight, J. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, S75–S79 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fyfe, J. C. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L22801 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, W. J., Wallace, J. M., Jones, P. D. & Kennedy, J. J. J. Clim. 22, 6120–6141 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fyfe, J. C., Gillett, N. P. & Thompson, D. W. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L16802 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlesinger, M. E. & Ramankutty, N. Nature 367, 723–726 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Solomon, S. et al. Science 333, 866–870 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fyfe, J. C., von Salzen, K., Cole, J. N. S., Gillett, N. P. & Vernier, J-P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 584–588 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Solomon, S. et al. Science 327, 1219–1223 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stott, P., Good, P., Jones, G., Gillett, N. & Hawkins, E. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014024 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Otto, A. et al. Nature Geosci. 6, 415–416 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Fasullo, J. T., Hu, A. & Trenberth, K. E. Nature Clim. Change 1, 360–364 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guemas, V., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Andreu-Burillo, I. & Asif, M. Nature Clim. Change 3, 649–653 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Greg Flato, Bill Merryfield and Slava Kharin for their comments on an early draft, Knutti Reto for input on our statistical analysis and Piers Forster and Jochem Marotzke for many helpful discussions. We acknowledge the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison and the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling for their roles in making the WCRP CMIP multi-model datasets available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, British Columbia, Canada

    John C. Fyfe & Nathan P. Gillett

  2. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8W 3R4, British Columbia, Canada

    Francis W. Zwiers

Authors
  1. John C. Fyfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathan P. Gillett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francis W. Zwiers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.C.F. helped to carry out the analysis and wrote the initial draft. N.P.G. and F.W.Z. helped with the analysis and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Fyfe.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

CMIP5 Models (PDF 241 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fyfe, J., Gillett, N. & Zwiers, F. Overestimated global warming over the past 20 years. Nature Clim Change 3, 767–769 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1972

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1972

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing