Letter | Published:

Effects of climate change on US grain transport

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 638643 (2013) | Download Citation


The United States is a global grain supplier. Agriculture uses 22% of all US transported tonnage with grain being the largest component1. Crop mix shifts are an often cited consequence of climate change2,3,4 and such shifts may change the demands grain places on the transport system. Studies also find that climate change could decrease Great Lakes water levels5,6,7,8, shorten the duration of ice cover in the winter9,10,11 and alter grain supplies in grain-exporting countries12. This study investigates the effects of such phenomena on US grain transportation movements both in volumes and modes. Specifically we examine the effects of possible shifts in: crop production patterns; Great Lakes water levels; winter navigation possibilities; and foreign grain production. We find that crop mix shifts reduce the importance of Lower Mississippi River ports, but increase the role of Pacific Northwest ports, Great Lakes ports and Atlantic ports. We also find a shift from barge to rail and truck transport. Conversely, a longer navigation season or a reduction in Great Lake water levels increases grain shipments to the ports in the Lower Mississippi River. Higher use of Great Lakes ports occurs under a reduction of grain production in European exporting countries that compete with Great Lakes ports.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , & in Study of Rural Transportation Issues (ed. Smith, M.) Ch. 2 (United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Transportation, 2010).

  2. 2.

    et al. Global climate change and US agriculture. Nature 345, 219–224 (1990).

  3. 3.

    et al. US agriculture and climate change: New results. Climatic Change 57, 43–67 (2003).

  4. 4.

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  5. 5.

    Climate change impacts on Laurentian Great Lakes levels. Climatic Change 17, 49–67 (1990).

  6. 6.

    Great Lakes water resources: Climate change impact analysis with transient GCM scenarios. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 35, 1499–1507 (1999).

  7. 7.

    & in Climate Change Impacts on the United States: Overview Report (eds National Assessment Synthesis Team) 167–188 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).

  8. 8.

    & The response of Great Lakes water levels to future climate scenarios with an emphasis on lake Michigan-Huron. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 36, 51–58 (2010).

  9. 9.

    , , & Climatic change and Great Lakes levels: The impact on shipping. Climatic Change 12, 107–133 (1988).

  10. 10.

    Great Lakes Regional Assessment Team. in A Summary by the Great Lakes Regional Assessment Group (eds Sousounis, P. J., Bisanz, J. M.) 29–37 (US Global Change Research Program, 2000).

  11. 11.

    & in Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes Region: Impacts on Our Communities and Ecosystems (eds Kling, G. W. et al.) 1–10 (Union of Concerned Scientists and the Ecological Society of America, 2005).

  12. 12.

    , , & Analysis of factors influencing grain traffic on the St. Lawrence Seaway. J. Trans. Res. Forum 48, 51–69 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute Agricultural Roads Study (North Dakota State Univ., 2011).

  14. 14.

    Crop Production 2011 Summary (The United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2011).

  15. 15.

    , , , & Climate Variability And Change with Implications for Transportation (Transportation Research Board, 2008).

  16. 16.

    & The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings. Trans. Res. Part D 14, 205–221 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on US Transportation (Transportation Research Board Special Report 290, 2008).

  18. 18.

    in Impact of Global Warming on Texas 2nd edn (eds Schmandt, J., Clarkson, J. & North, G. R.) 151–171 (Univ. Texas Press, 2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. Assessing regional impacts of change: Linking economic and environmental models. Agric. Syst. 63, 147–159 (2000).

  20. 20.

    , , , & The Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers as grain transport arteries: A spatial equilibrium analysis. J. Trans. Res. Forum 47, 1046–1469 (2008).

  21. 21.

    The potential impact of climate change on Great Lakes international shipping. Climatic Change 104, 629–652 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Drought under global warming: A review. WIREs Clim. Change 2, 45–65 (2010).

  23. 23.

    et al. Model Documentation for the Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model with Greenhouse Gases (FASOMGHG) (US Environmental Protection Agency Climate Change Division, 2010).

  24. 24.

    & Transportation of US grains: A Modal Share Analysis 1978–2007 (US Transportation Services Division, USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, 2011).

  25. 25.

    , & Climate Change Impacts on US Agriculture (International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, 2010).

Download references


This article obtained the financial support from the University Transportation Center for Mobility, Texas Transportation Institute. We also thank all the people who have made valuable comments to this work in the 2011 NAREA & AAEA Joint Annual Meeting and 2012 Systemic Impacts of Climate on Transportation Workshop held by the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, US Department of Transportation. Finally, we thank the Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Thailand, for the financial support to W.A.

Author information


  1. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

    • Witsanu Attavanich
  2. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, Texas 77843, USA

    • Bruce A. McCarl
    • , Zafarbek Ahmedov
    • , Stephen W. Fuller
    •  & Dmitry V. Vedenov


  1. Search for Witsanu Attavanich in:

  2. Search for Bruce A. McCarl in:

  3. Search for Zafarbek Ahmedov in:

  4. Search for Stephen W. Fuller in:

  5. Search for Dmitry V. Vedenov in:


W.A. collected the data set, developed the modified model of ref. 19 and the IGTM, and carried out the estimations and analyses for the entire paper. B.A.M. provided the conceptual ideas, analyses and recommendations for the entire paper. Z.A collected the data set for the IGTM. S.W.F. provided the conceptual ideas, analyses and recommendations in the IGTM. D.V.V. provided the conceptual ideas. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Witsanu Attavanich.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading