Oblivious money-men

With proper forethought, climate finance could cut gender inequity and consequentially become more economically efficient. But the opposite may happen if funds ignore the issue, warns Anna Petherick.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Female participation at international climate change conferences during the past five years.


  1. 1

    World Bank International Development Association (IDA); available at http://www.worldbank.org/ida/profile-gender.html

  2. 2

    Gender, Climate Change and Health (World Health Organization, 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/gSMWdn

  3. 3

    Agriculture and Rural Development: Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook (World Bank, 2009).

  4. 4

    Women in Agriculture: Closing the Gender Gap for Development (FAO, 2011).

  5. 5

    Independent Evaluation Group Gender and Development: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 2002–2008 (World Bank, 2010); available via http://go.nature.com/6rCvdf

  6. 6

    Hemmati, M. & RÖhr, U. in Climate Change and Gender Justice (ed. Terry, G.) 155–168 (Oxfam, 2009).

  7. 7

    Schalatek, L. & Nakhooda, S. Brief 10: Climate Finance Fundamentals. (The Overseas Development Institute & Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/TjYC5Q

  8. 8

    Norgaard, K. & York, R. Gend. Soc. 19, 502–522 (2005).

  9. 9

    Räty, R. & Carlsson-Kanyama, A. Energy Policy 38, 646–649 (2010).

  10. 10

    Burns, B. Women's Participation in UN Climate Negotiations (eds Blomstrom, E. & Owren, C.) (WEDO, 2012); available via http://go.nature.com/apP8KR

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Anna Petherick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petherick, A. Oblivious money-men. Nature Clim Change 3, 96–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1814

Download citation