With proper forethought, climate finance could cut gender inequity and consequentially become more economically efficient. But the opposite may happen if funds ignore the issue, warns Anna Petherick.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
World Bank International Development Association (IDA); available at http://www.worldbank.org/ida/profile-gender.html
Gender, Climate Change and Health (World Health Organization, 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/gSMWdn
Agriculture and Rural Development: Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook (World Bank, 2009).
Women in Agriculture: Closing the Gender Gap for Development (FAO, 2011).
Independent Evaluation Group Gender and Development: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 2002–2008 (World Bank, 2010); available via http://go.nature.com/6rCvdf
Hemmati, M. & RÖhr, U. in Climate Change and Gender Justice (ed. Terry, G.) 155–168 (Oxfam, 2009).
Schalatek, L. & Nakhooda, S. Brief 10: Climate Finance Fundamentals. (The Overseas Development Institute & Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/TjYC5Q
Norgaard, K. & York, R. Gend. Soc. 19, 502–522 (2005).
Räty, R. & Carlsson-Kanyama, A. Energy Policy 38, 646–649 (2010).
Burns, B. Women's Participation in UN Climate Negotiations (eds Blomstrom, E. & Owren, C.) (WEDO, 2012); available via http://go.nature.com/apP8KR
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petherick, A. Oblivious money-men. Nature Clim Change 3, 96–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1814
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1814
