Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Carbon mismanagement in Brazil

To the Editor

Knowing the gaps in CO2 inventories is fundamental for climate change science, as well as for global politics. The uncertainty of the emissions estimates is a great challenge for global greenhouse-gas (GHG) mitigation, as are emissions management strategies. Brazil missed its opportunity to lead by example1 in the matter of mitigation. In most countries, CO2 emissions mainly come from industrial sources, whereas in Brazil the majority (80%) originates from land use, land-use change and forestry. Brazil's national climate change policy defines a GHG emission reduction target of 36.1–38.9% by 2020, however, recently approved amendments to the Brazilian Forest Code (BFC) frustrate any attempts to protect and manage wetlands2. BFC is now allowing the shrimp farming industry to convert 10–35% of all salt flats into ponds, which could hugely increase CO2 emissions.

Estimates indicate that Brazilian salt flats cover 230,000 ha. Freshwater and brackish tidal wetlands occupy an additional 5,000,000 ha. Like salt flats, brackish wetlands are under a tidal regime but differ in interstitial salinity variation. Although these wetlands are biogeochemically different, they could be wrongly identified as suitable areas for conversion to shrimp ponds. Fifty thousand hectares have already been occupied by shrimp production3,4, mainly on salt flats5, and the BFC is now allowing the occupancy of another 36,000 ha. Agribusiness stakeholders claimed before the Brazilian Parliament that shrimp farming had the potential to be expanded over 1,000,000 ha (ref. 6). This occupancy is actually only possible if brackish wetlands (550,000 ha) are converted for shrimp production.

Despite the magnitude and increasing growth rate of shrimp farming during the past decade (from 7,000 to 90,000 tonnes per year production), its CO2 emissions — resulting from both land conversion and shrimp production — have not been included in Brazil's emission statistics7, thereby underestimating the country's share in the responsibility of climate change mitigation. If we consider only shrimp farms that have already been installed, that land conversion led to the emission of 0.012 gigatonnes of CO2 per year, given that one hectare of wetland soil stores about 1,298 tonnes of CO2 and that 75% of this sink is released immediately after clear cutting8. These land conversions correspond to 1.5% of all Brazilian marine wetlands, or only 0.03% of the national territory; however, they alone account for 1% of the total Brazilian yearly CO2 emissions9. BFC's related uncertainties regarding wetland types could make these estimates escalate by a factor of eleven. This is important not only for meeting mitigation targets, but also for conservation.

References

  1. 1

    Scarano, F., Guimarães, A. & Silva, J. M. Nature 486, 25–26 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rovai, A. S., Menghini, R. P., Schaeffer-Novelli, Y., Cintrón-Molero, G. & Coelho, C. Jr Science 335, 1571–1572 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Daldegan, G. A., Matsumoto, M. & Chatwin, A. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto 13, 851–857 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Prates, A. P. L., Gonçalves, M. A. & Rosa, M. R. Panorama da Conservação dos Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos no Brasil (MMA/SBF/GBA, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Zitello, A. G. Assessment of the Impact of Shrimp Aquaculture in Northeast Brazil: A Remote Sensing Approach to Coastal Habitat Change Detection (Duke University, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Rocha, I. P. Código Florestal: Pleitos ABCC e SIESAL (Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Camarão, 2012); available via http://go.nature.com/tWWw.UO

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Copertino, M. S. Nature 473, 255 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Murray, B. C., Pendleton, L., Jenkins, W. A. & Sifleet, S. Green Payments for Blue Carbon: Economic Incentives for Protecting Threatened Coastal Habitats (Nicholas Institute, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia. Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima (MCT, 2010).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Roberto Pagliosa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagliosa, P., Rovai, A. & Fonseca, A. Carbon mismanagement in Brazil. Nature Clim Change 2, 764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1718

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing