Perspective | Published:

Last chance for carbon capture and storage

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 105111 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

Anthropogenic energy-related CO2 emissions are higher than ever. With new fossil-fuel power plants, growing energy-intensive industries and new sources of fossil fuels in development, further emissions increase seems inevitable. The rapid application of carbon capture and storage is a much heralded means to tackle emissions from both existing and future sources. However, despite extensive and successful research and development, progress in deploying carbon capture and storage has stalled. No fossil-fuel power plants, the greatest source of CO2 emissions, are using carbon capture and storage, and publicly supported demonstration programmes are struggling to deliver actual projects. Yet, carbon capture and storage remains a core component of national and global emissions-reduction scenarios. Governments have to either increase commitment to carbon capture and storage through much more active market support and emissions regulation, or accept its failure and recognize that continued expansion of power generation from burning fossil fuels is a severe threat to attaining objectives in mitigating climate change.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    World Energy Outlook 2011 (IEA, 2011); available at

  2. 2.

    Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage (IEA, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Statistical Review of World Energy 2011 (BP, 2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. 2.6: Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century. Energy Econ. 31(Supplement 2), S107–S120 (2009).

  5. 5.

    IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  6. 6.

    The Costs of CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage (ZEP, 2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. Retrofitting CO2 Capture to Existing Power Plants (IEAGHG, 2011).

  8. 8.

    & 'Capture ready' regulation of fossil fuel power plants — Betting the UK's carbon emissions on promises of future technology. Energy Policy 38, 6695–6702 (2010).

  9. 9.

    CCS readiness at Šoštanj: Ticking boxes or preparing for the future? (Bellona, 2011); available via

  10. 10.

    & The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3076–3084 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electrcity (NETL, 2010).

  12. 12.

    Improvement in Power Generation with Post-Combustion Capture of CO2 (IEAGHG, 2004).

  13. 13.

    & UK MARKAL Modelling — Examining Decarbonisation Pathways in the 2020s on the Way to Meeting the 2050 Emissions Target Final Report for the Committee on Climate Change (UCL Energy Institute, 2010); available via

  14. 14.

    , & Valuing power plant flexibility with CCS: the case of post-combustion capture retrofits. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 17, 621–649 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Feasibility study for Europe-wide CO2 infrastructures (ARUP & SCCS, 2010); available via

  16. 16.

    Carbon capture and storage: How green can black be? Science 325, 1647–1652 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Progressing Scotland's CO2 Storage Opportunities (SCCS, 2011).

  18. 18.

    & Have we overestimated saline aquifer CO2 storage capacities? Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 66, 81–92 (2011).

  19. 19.

    & Pressurization and brine displacement issues for deep saline formation CO2 storage. Energy Procedia 4, 4814–4821 (2011).

  20. 20.

    & Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 70, 123–130 (2010).

  21. 21.

    , & Open or closed? A discussion of the mistaken assumptions in the Economides pressure analysis of carbon sequestration. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 74, 107–110 (2010).

  22. 22.

    & Reply to: Open or closed? A discussion of the mistaken assumptions in the Economides analysis of carbon sequestration. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 74, 111–112 (2010).

  23. 23.

    , , & A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 2, 626–639 (2008).

  24. 24.

    Post-closure migration for CO2 geological storage and regional pressure inferences. Energy Procedia 1, 3259–3266 (2009).

  25. 25.

    et al. Water control. Oilfield Rev. 12, 30–51 (2000).

  26. 26.

    & Snøhvit-CO2 sprenger reservoaret. Tesnik Ukerblad (19 May 2011); available at

  27. 27.

    , , & Injection of CO2 into saline formations: Benchmarking worldwide projects. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89, 1855–1864 (2011).

  28. 28.

    , , & CO2 Aquifer Storage Site Evaluation and Monitoring (CASSEM, 2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. Carbon Capture and Storage: Realising the potential? (UKERC, 2012).

  30. 30.

    & Carbon capture and storage: More energy or less carbon? J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2, 031006 (2010).

  31. 31.

    (ed.) Global CCS Projects Map (SCCS,2012); available at

  32. 32.

    The Global Status of CCS (Global Carbon Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, 2011); available via

  33. 33.

    G8 Hokkaido Toyako Summit Leaders Declaration (G8, 2008); available via

  34. 34.

    & in Caching the Carbon: The Politics and Policy of Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Meadowcroft, J. & Langhelle, O.) 267–296 (Edward Elgar, 2009).

  35. 35.

    , & The geography of CCS regulatory development in the U.S. Energy Procedia 1, 4543–4550 (2009).

  36. 36.

    , & Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: A new coalition endeavors to change existing policy. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 313–323 (2011).

  37. 37.

    Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 (IEA, 2012).

  38. 38.

    Cleaner Coal Faces an Uncertain Future (MIT Technology Review, 2011); available via

  39. 39.

    , & Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: A qualitative multi-criteria analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 346–357 (2011).

  40. 40.

    Energy Roadmap 2050 (EU, 2011); available via

  41. 41.

    , & Assessing the health risks of natural CO2 seeps in Italy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 16545–16548 (2011).

  42. 42.

    , & The impact of carbon capture and storage on climate. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 81–91 (2009).

  43. 43.

    & Evaluating uncertain CO2 abatement over the very long term. Environ. Model. Assess. 17, 1–12 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Low-cost carbon-capture project sparks interest. Nature 469, 276–277 (2011).

  45. 45.

    United Nations Climate Change Secretariat Durban Conference Delivers Breakthrough in International Community's Response to Climate Change (UNFCCC, 2011); available via

  46. 46.

    , & Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 37, 2161–2165 (2009).

  47. 47.

    , & The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage (Routledge, 2012).

  48. 48.

    , & Carbon capture and storage at scale: Lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies. Energy Policy 38, 4089–4098 (2010).

  49. 49.

    , , , & CCS in China: Toward an Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulatory Framework (WRI, 2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from Scottish Funding Council (V.S., R.S.H), UK Natural Environment Research Council (S.G.), UK Energy Research Centre (N.M.). We thank colleagues at the Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage centre www.sccs.org.uk for discussions and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK

    • Vivian Scott
    • , Stuart Gilfillan
    • , Nils Markusson
    • , Hannah Chalmers
    •  & R. Stuart Haszeldine

Authors

  1. Search for Vivian Scott in:

  2. Search for Stuart Gilfillan in:

  3. Search for Nils Markusson in:

  4. Search for Hannah Chalmers in:

  5. Search for R. Stuart Haszeldine in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian Scott.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1695

Further reading