Letter | Published:

Eurasian Arctic greening reveals teleconnections and the potential for structurally novel ecosystems

Nature Climate Change volume 2, pages 613618 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Arctic warming has been linked to observed increases in tundra shrub cover and growth in recent decades1,2,3 on the basis of significant relationships between deciduous shrub growth/biomass and temperature3,4,5,6,7. These vegetation trends have been linked to Arctic sea-ice decline5 and thus to the sea-ice/albedo feedback known as Arctic amplification8. However, the interactions between climate, sea ice and tundra vegetation remain poorly understood. Here we reveal a 50-year growth response over a >100,000 km2 area to a rise in summer temperature for alder (Alnus) and willow (Salix), the most abundant shrub genera respectively at and north of the continental treeline. We demonstrate that whereas plant productivity is related to sea ice in late spring, the growing season peak responds to persistent synoptic-scale air masses over West Siberia associated with Fennoscandian weather systems through the Rossby wave train. Substrate is important for biomass accumulation, yet a strong correlation between growth and temperature encompasses all observed soil types. Vegetation is especially responsive to temperature in early summer. These results have significant implications for modelling present and future Low Arctic vegetation responses to climate change, and emphasize the potential for structurally novel ecosystems to emerge from within the tundra zone.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Satellite-observed photosynthetic trends across boreal North America associated with climate and fire disturbance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13521–13525 (2005).

  2. 2.

    , & Climate change—increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411, 546–547 (2001).

  3. 3.

    et al. Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nature Clim. Change 2, 453–457 (2012).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Phytomass patterns across a temperature gradient of the North American Arctic tundra. J. Geophys. Res. 113, G03S02 (2008).

  5. 5.

    et al. Circumpolar Arctic tundra vegetation change is linked to sea ice decline. Earth Inter. 14, 1–20 (2010).

  6. 6.

    , & Russian Arctic warming and ‘greening’ are closely tracked by tundra shrub willows. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1542–1554 (2010).

  7. 7.

    et al. Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1342–1346 (2006).

  8. 8.

    & Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: A research synthesis. Glob. Planet. Change 77, 85–96 (2011).

  9. 9.

    , , & Relationship between satellite-derived land surface temperatures, arctic vegetation types, and NDVI. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 1884–1894 (2008).

  10. 10.

    , & The early twentieth-century warming in the Arctic—a possible mechanism. J. Clim. 17, 4045–4057 (2004).

  11. 11.

    et al. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4485–4498 (2005).

  12. 12.

    et al. The circumpolar arctic vegetation map. J. Vegetation Sci. 16, 267–282 (2005).

  13. 13.

    , & NDVI patterns and phytomass distribution in the circumpolar Arctic. Remote Sens. Environ. 102, 271–281 (2006).

  14. 14.

    & Arctic climate change discourse: The contrasting politics of research agendas in the West and Russia. Polar Res. 28, 28–42 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. High resilience in the Yamal–Nenets social-ecological system, West Siberian Arctic, Russia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22041–22048 (2009).

  16. 16.

    & Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon. Weath. Rev. 115, 1083–1126 (1987).

  17. 17.

    & Scandinavian pattern and its climatic impact. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 2117–2131 (2007).

  18. 18.

    et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of greenness on the Yamal Peninsula, Russia: Interactions of ecological and social factors affecting the Arctic normalized difference vegetation index. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045004 (2009).

  19. 19.

    et al. Electronic atlas of the Russian Arctic coastal zone. Geo-Mar. Lett. 25, 81–88 (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol. Monogr. 69, 491–511 (1999).

  21. 21.

    et al. From genotype to phenotype: Unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees. Can. J. Botany 81, 1247–1266 (2003).

  22. 22.

    , & Changes in snow cover over Northern Eurasia in the last few decades. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045026 (2009).

  23. 23.

    , & A multi-data set analysis of variability and change in Arctic spring snow cover extent, 1967–2008. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D16111 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. Influence of changed vegetations fields on regional climate simulations in the Barents Sea Region. Climatic Change 87, 35–50 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Cryogenic landslides on the Yamal Peninsula, Russia: Preliminary observations. Permafrost Periglac. Process. 6, 259–264 (1995).

  26. 26.

    , & Spatiotemporal dynamics of forest–tundra communities in the Polar Urals. Russian J. Ecol. 36, 69–75 (2005).

  27. 27.

    , & The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 686–702 (2006).

  28. 28.

    , , & Structurally novel biomes: A response to past warming in Beringia. Ecology 86, 1696–1703 (2005).

  29. 29.

    , & Climate change and the northern Russian treeline zone. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 2283–2299 (2008).

  30. 30.

    , & The circumboreal tundra-taiga interface: Late pleistocene and holocene changes. Ambio Spec. 12, 15–22 (2002).

  31. 31.

    & A continuous multimillennial ring-width chronology in Yamal, northwestern Siberia. Holocene 12, 717–726 (2002).

  32. 32.

    et al. Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 2. Modeling, paleodata-model comparisons, and future projections. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8171 (2003).

  33. 33.

    et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996).

  34. 34.

    & 408 (Springer, 1990).

  35. 35.

    & DENDROCLIM2002: A C++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree-ring chronologies. Comput. Geosci. 30, 303–311 (2004).

  36. 36.

    & Statistical field significance and its determination by Monte Carlo techniques. Month. Weath. Rev. 111, 46–59 (1983).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The overall work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grants NNG6GE00A and NNX09AK56G), the Northern Eurasian Earth Science Partnership Initiative, the Academy of Finland’s Russia in Flux programme through the ENSINOR project (decision 208147), the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (grant 0531200) and the Nordic Centre of Excellence—TUNDRA. M.M-F. was financially supported by a Marie Curie Research Fellowship during the completion of this study (Grant Agreement Number 254206, project ECOCHANGE: Creating conditions for persistence of biodiversity in the face of climate change).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Long-term Ecology Laboratory, Biodiversity Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK

    • Marc Macias-Fauria
  2. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Box 122, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland

    • Bruce C. Forbes
  3. Laboratory of Dendrochronology, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland

    • Pentti Zetterberg
  4. Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonkatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland

    • Timo Kumpula

Authors

  1. Search for Marc Macias-Fauria in:

  2. Search for Bruce C. Forbes in:

  3. Search for Pentti Zetterberg in:

  4. Search for Timo Kumpula in:

Contributions

M.M-F. performed the statistical analysis, wrote the manuscript and created the figures. B.C.F. designed and performed the field expeditions and sampling, supervised the project and collaborated in writing the manuscript. P.Z. dated and measured the ring-width chronologies. T.K. performed fieldwork (ground truthing of satellite imagery) and laboratory remote-sensing analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce C. Forbes.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1558

Further reading