Computer models generate projections of future climatic conditions that lie at the crux of climate change science and policy, and are increasingly used by decision-makers. Yet their complexity and politicization can hinder the communication of their science, uses and limitations. Little information on climate models has appeared in US newspapers over more than a decade. Indeed, we show it is declining relative to climate change. When models do appear, it is often within sceptic discourses. Using a media index from 2007, we find that model projections were frequently portrayed as likely to be inaccurate. Political opinion outlets provided more explanation than many news sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
National Research Council A National Strategy for Advancing Climate Modeling [Statement of Task] (National Academy Press, 2010); available at http://dels.nas.edu/Study-In-Progress/National-Strategy-Advancing-Climate/DELS-BASC-09–04.
Edwards, P. N. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Sci. Cult. 8, 460 (1999).
Revkin, A. C. Computers add sophistication, but don't resolve climate debate. The New York Times F3 (31 August 2004).
Idso, C. D. & Singer, S. F. Climate Change Reconsidered: 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) (Heartland Institute, 2009).
Idso, C. D., Carter, R. M. & Singer, S. F. Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) (Heartland Institute, 2011).
Rayner, S. in Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature 1st edn (eds Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. A. & Byerly, R.) 269–296 (Island, 2000).
Sarewitz, D. & Pielke, R. A. Jr Breaking the global-warming gridlock. The Atlantic (July 2000); available at http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/07/breaking-the-global-warming-gridlock/4973/.
Shackley, S., Young, P., Parkinson, S. & Wynne, B. Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: Are GCMs the best tools? Climatic Change 38, 159–205 (1998).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007); available at http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf.
Shukla, J. et al. Revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: A declaration at the world modelling summit for climate prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 175–178 (2009).
Leiserowitz, A., Smith, N. & Marlon, J. R. Americans' Knowledge of Climate Change (Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale Univ., 2010).
Trenberth, K. More knowledge, less certainty. Nature Rep. Clim. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/climate.2010.06 (2010).
Wilson, K. M. Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Underst. Sci. 9, 1–13 (2000).
Wilson, K. M. Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Comm. Review 22, 75–89 (1995).
Boykoff, M. T. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
McFarling, U. L. in A Field Guide for Science Writers 2nd edn (eds Blum, D., Knudson, M. & Henig, R. M.) 243–250 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Moser, S. C. & Dilling, L. (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Ward, B. (ed.) Reporting on Climate Change: Understanding the Science (Environmental Law Institute, 2003).
Ward, B. Communicating on Climate Change: An Essential Resource for Journalists, Scientists and Educators (Metcalf Institute for Marine & Environmental Reporting, 2008).
Richardson, L. J. & Ward, B. Reporting on Climate Change: Understanding the Science (Environmental Law Institute, 2011).
Boykoff, M. 2000–2011 US Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming (Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Univ. Colorado, 2011).
Menashe, C. L. & Seigel, M. The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues - United States, 1985–1996. J. Health Commun. 3, 307–325 (1998).
Audit Bureau of Circulations eCirc (Schaumburg, 2010).
Von Storch, H., Bunde, A. & Stehr, N. in The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (eds Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B. & Schlosberg, D.) 113–128 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Weisskopf, M. Bush was aloof in warming debate. Washington Post A1 (31 October 1992).
Sununu, J. H. The Politics of Global Warming (International Conference on Climate Change, New York, 2009).
Morello, L. Defense experts want more explicit climate models. The New York Times (24 June 2010); available at http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/06/24/24climatewire-defense-experts-want-more-explicit-climate-m-35887.html.
Lemos, M. C. & Dilling, L. Equity in forecasting climate: Can science save the world's poor? Sci. Publ. Pol. 34, 109–116 (2007).
Lemos, M. C. & Rood, R. B. Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 670–682 (2010).
Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. Framing, agenda setting and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. J. Commun. 57, 9–20 (2007).
Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (W. H. Freeman & Company, 1995).
Nisbet M. C. & Huge, M. Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. Harv. Int. J. Press-Pol. 11, 3–40 (2006).
Mooney, C. & Nisbet, M. C. When coverage of evolution shifts to the political and opinion pages, the scientific context falls away, unraveling Darwin. Columbia Journal. Rev. 44, 31–39 (September/October 2005).
Boykoff, M. T. & Boykoff, J. M. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Glob. Environ. Change 14, 125–136 (2004).
Antilla, L. Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 338–352 (2005).
Zehr, S. C. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst. Sci. 9, 85–103 (2000).
Corbett, J. B. & Durfee, J. L. Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Sci. Commun. 26, 129–151 (2004).
Rogers, C. L. in Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science (eds Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S. & Rogers, C. L.) 179–200 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1999).
Yaros, R. A. Is it the medium or the message? Structuring complex news to enhance engagement and situational understanding by nonexperts. Commun. Res. 33, 285–309 (2006).
Rowan, K. E. A contemporary theory of explanatory writing. Writ. Commun. 5, 23–56 (1988).
Rowan, K. E. in The Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills (eds Greene, J. O. & Burleson, B. R.) 403–438 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2003).
Long, M. Scientific explanation in US newspaper science stories. Public Underst. Sci. 4, 119–130 (1995).
Clark, F. & Illman, D. L. A longitudinal study of The New York Times Science Times section. Sci. Commun. 27, 496–513 (2006).
Facts, science smash the global warming myth. The Rush Limbaugh Show (28 February 2007); available at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2007/02/28/facts_science_smash_the_global_warming_myth11.
Underground lakes may help explain glacier habits. National Public Radio (16 February 2007); available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7445126.
Study sees drought trend in US southwest. National Public Radio (6 April 2007); available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9423727.
Wood, G. Riders on the storm. Atlantic Monthly (1 October 2007); available at http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/10/riders-on-the-storm/6177/.
Global warming update: Hurricane forecasters wrong. The Rush Limbaugh Show (29 October 2007); available at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2007/10/29/global_warming_update_hurricane_forecasters_wrong.
Radio & Television News Association NPR Audience Hits New Peak (18 March 2007); available at http://rtna.blogspot.com/2007/03/npr-audience-hits-new-peak.html.
Brumfiel, G. Supplanting the old media? Nature 458, 274–277 (2009).
Nisbet, M. C. Climate Shift: Clear Vision for the Next Decade of Public Debate (American Univ., 2011); available at http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ClimateShift_report_June2011.pdf.
Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, A. M. in The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (eds Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B. & Schlosberg, D.) 144–160 (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Chafets, Z. Late-period Limbaugh. The New York Times (6 July 2008); available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/magazine/06Limbaugh-t.html.
Feldman, L. The opinion factor: The effects of opinionated news on information processing and attitude change. Polit. Commun. 28, 163–181 (2011).
Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C. & Leiserowitz, A. Global Warming's Six America's 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis (Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason and Yale universities, 2009).
Pidgeon, N. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Clim. Change 1, 35–41 (2011).
McGuffie, K. & Henderson-Sellers, A. A Climate Modelling Primer 3rd edn (John Wiley, 2005).
Hayes, A. F. & Krippendorff, K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Meas. 1, 77–89 (2007).
Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology 2nd edn (Sage, 2003).
Yanovitzky, I. & VanLear, A. in The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (eds Hayes, A. F., Slater, M. D. & Snyder, L. B.) 89–124 (Sage, 2008).
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey (Pew Research Center, 2006).
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey (Pew Research Center, 2008).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science (PDF 398 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akerlof, K., Rowan, K., Fitzgerald, D. et al. Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science. Nature Clim Change 2, 648–654 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1542
This article is cited by
Behavioral adaptation to climate change: new insights on psychosocial frameworks from the context of managed forests
Sustainability Science (2022)
Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement
Nature Climate Change (2016)
Echo chambers and false certainty
Nature Climate Change (2015)