There is a common perception that, if human societies make the significant adjustments necessary to substantively cut emissions of greenhouse gases, global temperature increases could be stabilized, and the most dangerous consequences of climate change could be avoided. Here we show results from global coupled climate model simulations with the new representative concentration pathway mitigation scenarios to 2300 to illustrate that, with aggressive mitigation in two of the scenarios, globally averaged temperature increase indeed could be stabilized either below 2 °C or near 3 °C above pre-industrial values. However, even as temperatures stabilize, sea level would continue to rise. With little mitigation, future sea-level rise would be large and continue unabated for centuries. Though sea-level rise cannot be stopped for at least the next several hundred years, with aggressive mitigation it can be slowed down, and this would buy time for adaptation measures to be adopted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 28 September 2018
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Lowe, J. A. & Gregory, J. M. A sea of uncertainty. Nature Rep. Clim. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/climate.2010.30 (2010).
Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).
Washington, W. M. et al. How much climate change can be avoided by mitigation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L08703 (2009).
Meehl, G. A. et al. Climate system response to external forcings and climate change projections in CCSM4. J. Clim. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00240.1 (2012).
Pardaens, A. K. et al. Sea-level rise and impacts projections under a future scenario with large greenhouse gas emission reductions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L12604 (2011).
Meehl, G. A. et al. How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307, 1769–1772 (2005).
Meehl, G. A. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 747–845 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Meehl, G. A. et al. Model-based evidence of deep-ocean heat uptake during surface-temperature hiatus periods. Nature Clim. Change, 1, 360–364 (2011).
O'Neill, B. C. & Oppenheimer, M. Climate change: Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 296, 1971–1972 (2002).
Oppenheimer, M. Global warming and the stability of the West Antarctic ice sheet. Nature 393, 325–332 (1998).
Oppenheimer, M. & Alley, R. B. The West Antarctic ice sheet and long term climate policy. Climatic Change 64, 1–10 (2004).
Rignot, E. et al. Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L05503 (2011).
Kerr, R. Galloping glaciers of Greenland have reined themselves in. Science 323, 458 (2009).
Church, J. et al. Revisiting the Earth's sea-level and energy budgets from 1961 to 2008. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L18601 (2011).
Konikow, L. F. Contribution of global groundwater depletion since 1900 to sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L17401 (2011).
Wada, Y. et al. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20402 (2010).
Kaser, G. et al. Mass balance of glaciers and ice caps: Consensus estimates for 1961–2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L19501 (2006).
Meier, M. et al. Glaciers dominate eustatic sea level rise in the 21st century. Science 317, 1064–1067 (2007).
Pritchard, H. D. et al. Extensive dynamic thinning on the margins of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Nature 461, 971–975 (2009).
Velicogna, I. Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L19503 (2009).
McKay, N. P., Overpeck, J. T. & Otto-Bliesner, B. L. The role of ocean thermal expansion in the last interglacial sea level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L14605 (2011).
Rahmstorf, S. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315, 368–370 (2007).
Vermeer, M. & Rahmstorf, S. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21527–21532 (2009).
Pfeffer, W. T., Harper, J. T., & O'Neel, S. Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st-century sea-level rise. Science 321, 1340–1343 (2008).
Nakashiki, N. et al. Recovery of thermohaline circulation under CO2 stabilization and overshoot scenarios. Ocean Model. 15, 200–217 (2006).
Yoshida, Y. et al. Multi-century ensemble global warming projections using the Community Climate System Model (CCSM3). J. Earth Simulator 3, 2–10 (2005).
Gillett, N. P. et al. Ongoing climate change following a complete cessation of carbon dioxide emissions. Nature Geosci. 4, 83–87 (2011).
Schewe, J., Levermann, A. & Meinshausen, M. Climate change under a scenario near 1.5 °C of global warming: Monsoon intensification, ocean warming and steric sea level rise. Earth Syst. Dynam. 2, 25–35 (2011).
Gent, P. et al. The Community Climate System Model version 4. J. Clim. 24, 4973–4991 (2011).
This research used computing resources of the Climate Simulation Laboratory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), which is sponsored by the National Science Foundation; the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725; and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors acknowledge helpful input from B. O'Neill at NCAR. Portions of this study were supported by the Office of Science (BER), US Department of Energy, Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC02-97ER62402, and the National Science Foundation. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP5, and we thank the climate modelling groups (listed in Supplementary Table S2) for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP5, the US Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provided coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Meehl, G., Hu, A., Tebaldi, C. et al. Relative outcomes of climate change mitigation related to global temperature versus sea-level rise. Nature Clim Change 2, 576–580 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1529
This article is cited by
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2022)
Estuaries and Coasts (2019)
Nature Climate Change (2018)
Nature Communications (2018)
Frontiers in Energy (2018)