Centuries of speculation about the causes of human stress on the environment is now being disciplined with empirical evidence, including analyses of differences in greenhouse-gas emissions across contemporary nation states. The cumulative results can provide useful guidance for both climate projections and for policy design. Growing human population and affluence clearly contribute to enhanced environmental stress. Evidence does not support the argument for amelioration of greenhouse-gas emissions at the highest levels of affluence. However, the role of other factors, such as urbanization, trade, culture and institutions remains ambiguous.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 16 June 2023
Communications Chemistry Open Access 21 March 2023
Biologia Futura Open Access 13 November 2022
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rosa, E. A. & Dietz, T. Climate change and society: Speculation, construction and scientific investigation. Int. Sociol. 13, 421–455 (1998).
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. in Evolution of Cognition (eds Heyes, C. & Huber, L.) 329–346 (MIT Press, 2000).
Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. & Bettinger, R. L. Was agriculture impossible during the Pleistocene but mandatory during the Holocene? A climate change hypothesis. Am. Antiquity 66, 387–411 (2001).
United Nations Development Programme Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World Human Development Report 2007/2008 (UNDP, 2007).
Rudel, T. K. et al. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 23–31 (2005).
DeFries, R., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geosci. 3, 178–181 (2010).
Williams, M. A new look at global forest histories of land clearing. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33, 345–367 (2008).
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. & Vandenbergh, M. P. The behavioral wedge: Household actions can rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18452–18456 (2009).
Wilk, R. R. in Environmentally Significant Consumption: Research Directions (eds Stern, P. C. et al.) 110–115 (National Academy Press, 1997).
York, R. Cross-national variation in the size of passenger car fleets: A study in environmentally significant consumption. Popul. Environ. 25, 119–140 (2003).
York, R. & Gossard, M. H. Cross-national meat and fish consumption: Exploring the effects of modernization and ecological context. Ecol. Econ. 48, 293–302 (2004).
Ehrlich, P. R. & Holdren, J. P. Impact of population growth. Science 171, 1212–1217 (1971).
Commoner, B., Corr, M. & Stamler, P. J. The causes of pollution. Environment 13, 2–19 (1971).
Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A. & York, R. in Threats to Sustainability: Understanding Human Footprints on the Global Environment (eds Rosa, E. A., Diekmann, A., Dietz, T. & Jaeger, C.) 83–132 (MIT Press, 2010).
Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (United Nations, 2011).
Davis, S. J. & Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5687–5692 (2010).
Kitzes, J. et al. A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts. Ecol. Econ. 68, 1991–2007 (2009).
Dietz, T. & Rosa, E. A. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 1, 277–300 (1994).
Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A. & York, R. Driving the human ecological footprint. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 13–18 (2007).
Jorgenson, A. K. & Clark, B. Assessing the temporal stability of the population/environment relationship in comparative perspective: A cross-national panel study of carbon dioxide emissions, 1960–2005. Popul. Environ. 32, 27–41 (2010).
Lankao, P. R., Tribbia, J. L. & Nychkla, D. Testing theories to explore the drivers of cities' atmospheric emissions. Ambio 38, 236–244 (2009).
York, R., Rosa, E. A. & Dietz, T. Footprints on the Earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68, 279–300 (2003).
Cramer, J. C. A demographic perspective on air quality: Conceptual issues surrounding environmental impacts of population growth. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 3, 191–196 (1997).
Cramer, J. C. Population growth and air quality in California. Demography 35, 45–56 (1998).
Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R. & Luck, G. W. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421, 530–533 (2003).
MacKellar, F. L., Lutz, W., Prinz, C. & Goujon, A. Population, households and CO2 emissions. Popul. Dev. Rev. 21, 849–865 (1995).
Knight, K. & Rosa, E. A. Household dynamics and fuelwood consumption in developing countries: A cross-national analysis. Popul. Environ. 33, 365–378 (2012).
Zhou, W. et al. Energy consumption patterns in the process of China's urbanization. Popul. Environ. 33, 202–220 (2012).
Jorgenson, A. K., Clark, B. & Kentor, J. Militarization and the environment: A panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970–2000. Glob. Environ. Polit. 10, 7–29 (2010).
Glaeser, E. L. & Kahn, M. E. The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J. Urban Econ. 67, 404–418 (2010).
Dietz, T. The human ecology of population and environment: From Utopia to Topia. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 3, 168–171 (1996/1997).
Frey, R. S. & Al-Mansour, I. The effects of development, dependence and population pressure on democracy: The cross-national evidence. Sociol. Spectrum 15, 181–208 (1995).
MartÌnez-Zarzoso, I. & Maruotti, A. The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 70, 1344–1353 (2011).
Shi, A. The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol. Econ. 44, 24–42 (2003).
York, R. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature Clim. Change 2, 441–443 (2012).
Anderson, C. H. The Sociology of Survival: Social Problems of Growth (Dorsey Press, 1976).
Schnaiberg, A. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity (Oxford Univ. Press, 1980).
Kuznets, S. Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45, 1–28 (1955).
Grossman, G. & Krueger, A. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 110, 353–377 (1995).
Mol, A. P. J. in The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology 2nd edn (eds Redclift, M. R. & Woodgate, G.) 63–76 (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2010).
Spaargaren, G. & Mol, A. P. J. Sociology, environment and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Soc. Natur. Resour. 5, 323–344 (1992).
Shafik, N. Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Econ. Pap. 46, 757–773 (1994).
Selden, T. M. & Song, D. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 27, 147–162 (1994).
Stern, D. I. & Common, M. S. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 41, 162–178 (2001).
Aslanidis, N. & Iranzo, S. Environment and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions? Appl. Econ. 41, 803–810 (2009).
Azomahou, T., Laisney, F. & Nguyen Van, P. Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach. J. Public Econ. 90, 1347–1363 (2006).
Carson, R. T. The environmental Kuznets curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4, 3–23 (2010).
Cavlovic, T., Baker, K. H., Berrens, R. P. & Gawande, K. A meta-analysis of Kuznets curve studies. Agr. Resour. Econ. Rev. 29, 32–42 (2000).
Jalil, A. & Mahmud, S. F. Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energ. Policy 37, 5167–5172 (2009).
United Nations Fund for Population Activities http://www.unfpa.org/public/ (2007).
Jorgenson, A. K. Does foreign investment harm the air we breathe and the water we drink? A cross-national study of carbon dioxide emissions and organic water pollution in less-developed countries, 1975 to 2000. Organ. Environ. 20, 137–156 (2007).
Jorgenson, A. K. The transnational organization of production, the scale of degradation, and ecoefficiency: A study of carbon dioxide emissions in less-developed countries. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 16, 64–74 (2009).
Jorgenson, A. K., Dick, C. & Shandra, J. M. World economy, world society, and environmental harms in less-developed countries. Sociol. Inq. 81, 53–87 (2011).
MartÌnez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A. & Morales-Lage, R. The impact of population on CO2 emissions: Evidence from European countries. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38, 497–512 (2007).
VandeWeghe, J. R. & Kennedy, C. A spatial analysis of residential greenhouse gas emissions in the Toronto census metropolitan area. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 133–144 (2007).
Foster, J. B. Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 105, 366–405 (1999).
Foster, J. B., Clark, B. & York, R. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism's War on the Earth (Monthly Review Press, 2010).
Cole, M. A. Development, trade, and the environment: How robust is the environmental Kuznets curve? Environ. Dev. Econ. 8, 557–580 (2003).
Cole, M. A. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecol. Econ. 48, 71–81 (2004).
Cole, M. A. Does trade liberalization increase national energy use? Econ. Lett. 92, 108–112 (2006).
Jorgenson, A. K. The effects of primary sector foreign investment on carbon dioxide emissions from agriculture production in less-developed countries, 1980–99. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 48, 29–42 (2007).
Ostrom, E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 550–557 (2010).
Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009).
Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 301, 1907–1912 (2003).
McCay, B. J. & Svein, J. in Human Footprints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability (eds Rosa, E. A., Diekmann, A., Dietz, T. & Jaeger, C.) 203–230 (MIT Press, 2010).
Young, O. in Human Footprints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability (eds Rosa, E. A., Diekmann, A., Dietz, T. & Jaeger, C.) 165–201 (MIT Press, 2010).
Whitford, A. B. & Wong, K. Political and social foundations for environmental sustainability. Polit. Res. Quart. 62, 190–204 (2009).
Jorgenson, A. K. Global warming and the neglected greenhouse gas: A cross-national study of the social causes of methane emissions intensity, 1995. Soc. Forces 84, 1779–1798 (2006).
Bättig, M. B. & Bernauer, T. National institutions and global public goods: Are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? Int. Organ. 63, 281–308 (2009).
Bogaards, M. Measures of democratization: From degree to type to war. Polit. Res. Quart. 63, 475–488 (2010).
Chiebug, J. A., Gandhi, J. & Vreeland, J. R. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143, 67–101 (2009).
Ostrom, E. A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions 1, 27–36 (2010).
Stern, P. C. Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 303–314 (2011).
Schultz, P. W. & Kaiser, F. G. in Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (ed. Clayton, S. D) (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).
Leach, W. D. & Sabatier, P. A. To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99, 491–503 (2005).
Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C. & Gutscher, H. (eds) Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Skepticism in the Public Mind (Earthscan, 2007).
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A. & Shwom, R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30, 335–372 (2005).
Heberlein, T. A. Navigating Environmental Attitudes (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).
Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A. & Webler, T. Risk, Uncertainly and Rational Action (Earthscan, 2001).
Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice. Am. Psychol. 58, 697–720 (2003).
Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. Toward a theory of choice: Socially embedded preference construction. J. Socio-Econ. 24, 261–279 (1995).
Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. Concern for the environment among general publics: A cross-national study. Soc. Natur. Resour. 20, 883–898 (2007).
Brechin, S. R. in The Routledge International Handbook of Climate Change and Society (ed Lever-Tracy, C.) 179–209 (Routledge Press, 2010).
Sandvik, H. Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth. Climatic Change 90, 333–341 (2008).
Ward, H. Liberal democracy and sustainability. Environ. Polit. 17, 386–409 (2008).
McCright, A. M. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul. Environ. 32, 66–87 (2010).
Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Stern, P. C. Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Race Gender Class 9, 1–19 (2002).
White, L. J. The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science 155, 1203–1207 (1967).
Morgan, M. G. & Keith, D. W. Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Climatic Change 90, 189–215 (2008).
Liu, J. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007).
Rosa, E. A. & Dietz, T. in Human Footprints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability (eds Rosa, E. A., Diekmann, A., Dietz, T. & Jaeger, C. C.) 1–45 (MIT Press, 2010).
US National Research Council Limiting the Magnitude of Climate Change (National Academy Press, 2010).
US National Research Council America's Climate Choices (National Academies Press, 2011).
Ehrlich, P. R. & Holdren, J. P. Hidden effects of overpopulation. Saturday Rev. 53, 52 (1970).
Chertow, M. The IPAT equation and its variants: Changing views of technology and environmental impact. J. Ind. Ecol. 4, 13–29 (2001).
Kaya, Y. Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios (IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, 1990).
Kaya, Y. & Yokobori, K. Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability (Unitied Nations Univ. Press, 1997).
Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
E.A.R. was partially supported by the Boeing Environmental Sociology Professorwhip. T.D. was partially supported by AgBio Research of Michigan State University. We thank R. Kelly for her overall assistance and S. Bryant for a close reading of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Rosa, E., Dietz, T. Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Clim Change 2, 581–586 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1506
This article is cited by
Scientific Reports (2023)
Communications Chemistry (2023)
Development zone policy and urban carbon emissions: empirical evidence from the construction of national high-tech industrial development zones in China
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
Machine learning accelerated carbon neutrality research using big data—from predictive models to interatomic potentials
Science China Technological Sciences (2022)
An investigation of the environmental Kuznets relationship in BRICS countries at a sectoral economic level
Energy Systems (2022)