Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Overestimation of Mediterranean summer temperature projections due to model deficiencies

Abstract

How anthropogenic climate change will affect the climate in dry and semi-arid regions has important implications for the course of regional development. It has become increasingly common to use high-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) nested within coarser-resolution global climate models to downscale climate change projections. The aim is to obtain physically consistent information about future climate with enhanced geographical detail1,2,3. Recently, it has been demonstrated4,5 that RCMs share systematic temperature-dependent biases, which affect their ability to capture accurately certain observable climate conditions. Here, we show that owing to a broad tendency for climate models (regional and global) to show systematic biases in warm, dry climates, it is likely that, at present, many climate models overestimate regional amplification of global warming. We study Europe using the central Mediterranean as an example. To correct for individual model deficiencies, we apply a bias correction conditioned on temperature. The results demonstrate that projections of intense mean summer warming partly result from model deficiencies, and when corrected for, the Mediterranean summer temperature projections are reduced by up to one degree, on average by 10–20%. Individual models may be overestimating warming by several degrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Model temperature biases.
Figure 2: Ranked mean temperatures.
Figure 3: Temperature change versus temperature bias slope.
Figure 4: Bias corrections.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christensen, J. H., Carter, T. R., Rummukainen, M. & Amanatidis, G. Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: The PRUDENCE project. Climatic Change 81 (Supl. 1), 1–6 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen, J. H., Kjellström, E., Giorgi, F., Lenderink, G. & Rummukainen, M. Weight assignment in regional climate models. Clim. Res. 44, 179–194 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giorgi, F., Jones, C. & Asrar, G. Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: The CORDEX framework. WMO Bull. 58, 175–183 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen, J. H., Boberg, F., Christensen, O. B. & Lucas-Picher, P. On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20709 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buser, C., Künsch, H. R., Lüthi, D., Wild, M. & Schär, C. Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: Bias assumptions and interannual variability. Clim. Dynam. 33, 849–868 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, J. H. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) Ch. 11 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hay, L. E., Wilby, R. L. & Leavesley, G. H. A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 36, 387–398 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Linden, P. & Mitchell, J. F. B. (eds) ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts. Summary of Research and Results from the ENSEMBLES Project (Met Office Hadley Centre, 2009).

  9. Uppala, S. M. et al. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 2961–3012 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakićenović, N. & Swart, R. (eds) Special Report on Emission Scenarios (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  11. Haylock, M. R. et al. A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D20119 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klok, E. J. & Klein Tank, A. M. Updated and extended European dataset of daily climate observations. Int. J. Climatol. 29, 1182–1191 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meehl, G. A. et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel ensemble—a new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1383–1394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacob, C. et al. An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: Design of the experiments and model performance. Climatic Change 81 (Suppl. 1), 31–52 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Meijgaard, E. et al. The KNMI Regional Atmospheric Climate Model RACMO, Version 2.1. TR-302, KNMI, De Bilt (2008).

  16. Giorgi, F. & Coppola, E. Does the model regional bias affect the projected regional climate change? An analysis of global model projections. Climatic Change 100, 769–815 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buser, C. M., Künsch, H. R. & Schär, C. Bayesian multi-model projections of climate: Generalization and application to ENSEMBLES results. Clim. Res 44, 227–241 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seneviratne, S. I., Lüthi, D., Litschi, M. & Schär, C. Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe. Nature 443, 205–209 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer, E. M., Seneviratne, S. I., Vidale, P. L., Lüthi, D. & Schär, C. Soil moisture-atmosphere interactions during the 2003 European summer heat wave. J. Clim. 20, 5081–5099 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ENSEMBLES project was supported by the European Commission’s 6th Framework Programme under the Thematic Sub-Priority ‘Global Change and Ecosystems’. We acknowledge the E-OBS and RCM modelling data set from the EU-FP6 project ENSEMBLES and the data providers in the ECA&D project. We acknowledge the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multimodel data set. Support of this data set is provided by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. The present work received financial support from the Danish Strategic Research Council through its support of Centre for Regional Change in the Earth System (CRES; www.cres-centre.dk) under contract no DSF-EnMi 09-066868.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.B. and J.H.C. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. F.B. carried out the analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Boberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boberg, F., Christensen, J. Overestimation of Mediterranean summer temperature projections due to model deficiencies. Nature Clim Change 2, 433–436 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1454

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing