Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change

This article has been updated


Climate change and human population growth are expected to have substantial impacts on global water resources throughout the twenty-first century1,2. Coastal aquifers are a nexus3 of the world’s oceanic and hydrologic ecosystems and provide a water source for the more than one billion people living in coastal regions4,5. Saltwater intrusion caused by excessive groundwater extraction is already impacting diverse regions of the globe5,6,7. Synthesis studies8,9 and detailed simulations10,11,12,13 have predicted that rising sea levels could negatively impact coastal aquifers through saltwater intrusion and/or inundation of coastal regions. However, the relative vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater extraction and sea-level rise has not been systematically examined. Here we show that coastal aquifers are more vulnerable to groundwater extraction than to predicted sea-level rise under a wide range of hydrogeologic conditions and population densities. Only aquifers with very low hydraulic gradients are more vulnerable to sea-level rise and these regions will be impacted by saltwater inundation before saltwater intrusion. Human water use is a key driver in the hydrology of coastal aquifers, and efforts to adapt to sea-level rise at the expense of better water management are misguided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Coastal aquifers are affected both by groundwater extraction and sea-level rise.
Figure 2: Present saltwater intrusion areas have a high population density and/or low hydraulic gradients.
Figure 3: The impact of groundwater extraction on coastal aquifers is more significant than the impact of sea-level rise.
Figure 4: The uncertainty owing to different aquifer types is significant as shown by simulation of these types over a range of coastal populations.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 April 2012

    In the version of this Letter originally published online, equation (1) was incorrect. This has now been corrected in all versions of the Letter.


  1. Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A. & Vecchia, A. V. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438, 347–350 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J. & Lammers, R. B. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289, 284–288 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, W. S. Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by 226Ra enrichments. Nature 380, 612–614 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Small, C. & Nicholls, R. J. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J. Coast. Res. 19, 584–599 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Post, V. E. A. Fresh and saline groundwater interaction in coastal aquifers: Is our technology ready for the problems ahead? Hydrogeol. J. 13, 120–123 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. FitzGerald, D. M., Fenster, M. S., Argow, B. A. & Buynevich, I. V. Coastal impacts due to sea-level rise. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 601–647 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow, P. & Reichard, E. Saltwater intrusion in coastal regions of North America. Hydrogeol. J. 18, 247–260 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  9. EPA National Water Program Strategy: Response to Climate Change 97 (EPA Office of Water, 2008).

  10. Masterson, J. P. & Garabedian, S. P. Effects of sea-level rise on ground water flow in a coastal aquifer system. Ground Wat. 45, 209–217 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb, M. D. & Howard, K. W. F. Modeling the transient response of saline intrusion to rising sea-levels. Ground Wat. 49, 560–569 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Werner, A. D. & Simmons, C. T. Impact of sea-level rise on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers. Ground Wat. 47, 197–204 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loáiciga, H. A., Pingel, T. J. & Garcia, E. S. Sea water intrusion by sea-level rise: Scenarios for the 21st century. Ground Wat. 50, 37–47 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271, 785–788 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodell, M., Velicogna, I. & Famiglietti, J. S. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 460, 999–1002 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wada, Y. et al. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20402 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strack, O. D. L. A single-potential solution for regional interface problems in coastal aquifers. Wat. Resour. Res. 12, 1165–1174 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gleeson, T., Marklund, L., Smith, L. & Manning, A. H. Classifying the water table at regional to continental scales. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L05401 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CIESIN Gridded Population of the World Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Density Grids (Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, 2005); available at

  20. Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Weaver, C. P., Walko, R. & Robock, A. Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 1. Water table observations and equilibrium water table simulations. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D10125 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. USDA-NRCS, USGS & EPA Watershed Boundary Dataset for the United States (2010); available at

  22. Wessel, P. & Smith, W. H. F. A global, self-consistent, hierarchical, high-resolution shoreline database. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 8741–8743 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanford, W. & Pope, J. Current challenges using models to forecast seawater intrusion: Lessons from the eastern shore of Virginia, USA. Hydrogeol. J. 18, 73–93 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gleeson, T. et al. Mapping permeability over the surface of the Earth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L02401 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reilly, T. E. & Goodman, A. S. Analysis of saltwater upconing beneath a pumping well. J. Hydrol. 89, 169–204 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gleick, P. H. et al. The World’s Water 2008–2009: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources (Island, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Döll, P. Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: A global-scale assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 035006 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, W. P. Jr Aquifer salinization from storm overwash. J. Coast. Res. 18, 413–420 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vorosmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rockstrom, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


M. Jellinek, L. Smith, E. Luijendijk, V. Bense and V. Gerard provided valuable advice during the writing of this manuscript. Y. Fan generously provided data on the water-table elevation. T.G. was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada postdoctoral fellowship and a Canadian Institute for Advanced Research junior fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Both authors contributed to planning of this paper. G.F. carried out the analytical modelling and T.G. conducted the GIS analyses. Both authors contributed to the writing of the paper and drafting of figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Ferguson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, G., Gleeson, T. Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nature Clim Change 2, 342–345 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing