Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade


It has long been assumed that human development depends on economic growth, that national economic expansion in turn requires greater energy use and, therefore, increased greenhouse-gas emissions. These interdependences are the topic of current research. Scarcely explored, however, is the impact of international trade: although some nations develop socio-economically and import high-embodied-carbon products, it is likely that carbon-exporting countries gain significantly fewer benefits. Here, we use new consumption-based measures of national carbon emissions1 to explore how the relationship between human development and carbon changes when we adjust national emission rates for trade. Without such adjustment of emissions, some nations seem to be getting far better development ‘bang’ for the carbon ‘buck’ than others, who are showing scant gains for disproportionate shares of global emissions. Adjusting for the transfer of emissions through trade explains many of these outliers, but shows that further socio-economic benefits are accruing to carbon-importing rather than carbon-exporting countries. We also find that high life expectancies are compatible with low carbon emissions but high incomes are not. Finally, we see that, despite strong international trends, there is no deterministic industrial development trajectory: there is great diversity in pathways, and national histories do not necessarily follow the global trends.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Correcting for trade: how moving from territorial to consumption-based emissions changes the relation between carbon and human development.
Figure 2: Simultaneous visualization of international life expectancy, income and consumption-based carbon emissions in 2004.
Figure 3: National development trajectories 1990–2005 for life expectancy, income and territorial and consumption-based emissions.


  1. 1

    Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L. & Edenhofer, O. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8903–8908 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (United Nations, 1992); available at

  3. 3

    Boden, T. A., Marland, G. & Andres, R. J. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO 2 Emissions (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2009).

  4. 4

    Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109, 213–241 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Baer, P., Athanasiou, T. & Kartha, S. in The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework 1–95 (Heinrich Böll Foundation, Christian Aid, EcoEquity and the Stockholm Environment Institute, 2007); available at

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Cottrell, F. Energy and Society. The Relation between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Mazur, A. & Rosa, E. Energy and life-style. Science 186, 607–610 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    UNDP Energy as an Instrument for Socio-Economic Development (United Nations Development Programme, 1995).

  9. 9

    Goldemberg, J. & Johansson, T. B. in World Energy Assessment. Overview 2004 Update 1–85 (United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the World Energy Council, 2004); available at

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Wilkinson, P., Smith, K. R., Joffe, M. & Haines, A. A global perspective on energy: Health effects and injustices. Lancet 370, 965–978 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Preston, S. H. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Int. J. Epidemiol. 36, 484–490 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    UNDP Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development (United Nations Development Programme, 2010).

  13. 13

    Steinberger, J. K. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econ. 70, 425–433 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Peters, G. P. & Hertwich, E. G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 1401–1407 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Davis, S. J. & Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5687–5692 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6414–6420 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Levinson, A. Offshoring pollution: Is the United States increasingly importing polluted goods? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4, 63–83 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Peters, G. P. Policy update: Managing carbon leakage. Carbon Manage. 1, 35–37 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Caldeira, K. & Davis, S. J. Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions: A matter of time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8533–8534 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Roberts, J. T. & Parks, B. C. A Climate of Injustice. Global Inequality, North–South Politics, and Climate Policy (MIT Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Dicken, P. Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy Sixth Edition (Sage, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Bunker, S. G. Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: The Brazilian Amazon, 1600–1980. Am. J. Sociol. 89, 1017–1064 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Unruh, G. C. & Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energ. Policy 34, 1185–1197 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Stern, D. Between estimates of the emissions-income elasticity. Ecol. Econ. 69, 2173–2182 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Rothman, D. S. Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecol. Econ. 25, 177–194 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Suri, V. & Chapman, D. Economic growth, trade and energy: Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25, 195–208 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wiedmann, T. et al. A carbon footprint time series of the UK—results from a Multi-Region Input–Output model. Econ. Syst. Res. 22, 19–42 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Baiocchi, G. & Minx, J. C. Understanding changes in the UK’s CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1177–1184 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    UN World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2008).

  30. 30

    The World Bank World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2010); available at

Download references


J.T.R.’s start-up research fund from Brown University was critical in the completion of this work. We thank J. Karstensen of CICERO for help with Fig. 1.

Author information




J.K.S. and J.T.R. designed the research; J.K.S. and G.B. conducted the analysis; G.P.P. provided the consumption-based carbon data and feedback on its analysis; J.K.S., J.T.R. and G.P.P. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia K. Steinberger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinberger, J., Roberts, J., Peters, G. et al. Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade. Nature Clim Change 2, 81–85 (2012).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing