As scientists raise alarming questions about the true carbon cost of some biofuels, policymakers must decide how best to promote low-emission versions, reports Sonja van Renssen.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Opinion of the EEA Scientific Committee on Greenhouse Gas Accounting in Relation to Bioenergy (European Environment Agency Scientific Committee, 15 September 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/exGbJX.
BirdLife International, European Environmental Bureau & Transport & Environment Bioenergy: A Carbon Accounting Time Bomb (BirdLife International, June 2010); available via http://go.nature.com/coY8kB.
Bowyer, C. Anticipated Indirect Land Use Change Associated with Expanded use of Biofuels and Bioliquids in the EU —An Analysis of the National Renewable Energy Action Plans (Institute for European Environment Policy, March 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/1L59xo.
Marelli, L., Mulligan, D. & Edwards, R. Critical Issues in Estimating ILUC Emissions: Outcomes of an Expert Consultation 9–10 November 2010, Ispra (Italy) (European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2011).
Dunmore, C. Exclusive: climate impact threatens biodiesel future in EU. Reuters (8 July 2011); available via http://go.nature.com/aPlQKT.
Biofuels and Indirect Land Use Change (Ernst & Young, August 2011).
About this article
Cite this article
van Renssen, S. A biofuel conundrum. Nature Clim Change 1, 389–390 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1265
This article is cited by
Policy Sciences (2014)
Nature Climate Change (2013)
Nature Climate Change (2012)