Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Different views ensure IPCC balance

The accusation that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has produced a report that is biased by a conflict of interest is unfounded.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Teske, S., et al. Energy Efficiency 4, 409–433 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC Review of the IPCC Processes and Procedures: Task Group on Conflict of Interest Policy – Background Paper IPCC-XXXIII/Doc. 11, Add.1. (IPCC, 2011).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ottmar Edenhofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edenhofer, O. Different views ensure IPCC balance. Nature Clim Change 1, 229–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1178

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing