Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience

Abstract

One of the reasons that people may not take action to mitigate climate change is that they lack first-hand experience of its potential consequences. From this perspective, individuals who have direct experience of phenomena that may be linked to climate change would be more likely to be concerned by the issue and thus more inclined to undertake sustainable behaviours. So far, the evidence available to test this hypothesis is limited, and in part contradictory1,2,3,4. Here we use national survey data collected from 1,822 individuals across the UK in 2010, to examine the links between direct flooding experience, perceptions of climate change and preparedness to reduce energy use. We show that those who report experience of flooding express more concern over climate change, see it as less uncertain and feel more confident that their actions will have an effect on climate change. Importantly, these perceptual differences also translate into a greater willingness to save energy to mitigate climate change. Highlighting links between local weather events and climate change is therefore likely to be a useful strategy for increasing concern and action.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Impact of flooding experience on preparedness to reduce energy use mediated by perceived instrumentality, concern, uncertainty and perceived local vulnerability.

References

  1. 1

    Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res. 11, 351–374 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Dessai, S. & Sims, K. Public perception of drought and climate change in Southeast England. Environ. Hazards 9, 340–357 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. & Grover, H. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ. Behav. 41, 72–95 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H. & Vedlitz, A. Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19, 771–789 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Spence, A. & Pidgeon, N. F. Psychology, climate change and sustainable behaviour. Environment 52, 9–18 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    UK Energy Research Centre Making the Transition to a Secure and Low-carbon Energy System: UKERC Energy 2050 Project (UKERC, 2009).

  7. 7

    Eurobarometer Europeans’ Attitudes Towards Climate Change (Special Eurobarometer 322, European Commission, 2009).

  8. 8

    Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. & Roser-Renouf, C. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in January 2010 (Yale University and George Mason University, 2010); available at http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/AmericansGlobalWarmingBeliefs2010.pdf (accessed 28 October 2010).

  9. 9

    YouGov/EDF Energy Survey Results (2010); available at http://www.yougov.com (accessed 28 October 2010).

  10. 10

    Weber, E. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1, 332–342 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Weber, E. & Stern, P. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychol. 10.1037/a0023253 (in the press).

  12. 12

    Swim, J. et al. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-Faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges (American Psychological Association, 2009); available at http://www.apa.org/science/climate-change.

  13. 13

    Lorenzoni, I. & Pidgeon, N. F. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim. Change 77, 73–95 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Willians, L. E. & Bargh, J. A. The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychol. Sci. 19, 302–308 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Weber, E. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim. Change 77, 103–120 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol. 5, 207–232 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 705–717 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour. Environ. Educ. Res. 8, 239–260 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lawrence, A. The first cuckoo in winter: Phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Glob. Environ. Chang. 19, 173–179 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Reisinger, A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  21. 21

    Pall, P. et al. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470, 382–386 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Pidgeon, N. F. & Butler, C. Risk analysis and climate change. Environ. Polit. 18, 670–688 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Hulme, M. Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theor. Cult. Soc. 27, 267–276 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Arcury, T. A. & Christinason, E. H. Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems: Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared. Environ. Behav. 22, 387–407 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Marshall, B. K., Picou, J. S. & Bevc, C. A. Ecological disaster as contextual transformation: Environmental values in a renewable resource community. Environ. Behav. 37, 706–728 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    deMan, A. & Simpson-Housley, P. Correlates of responses to two potential hazards. J. Soc. Psychol. 128, 385–391 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Pitt, M. The Pitt Review, Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods (Cabinet Office, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Boycoff, M. We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 431–457 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Meth. 40, 879–891 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. SPSS Macro for Multiple Mediation (2008); available at http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes/.

  31. 31

    Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W. & Demski, C. Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January-March 2010 (Technical Report) (Understanding Risk Working Paper 10-1, Cardiff University, 2010); available at http://www.understanding-risk.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a research grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (RES-062-23-1134) as well as a Climate Change Leader Fellowship (RES-066-27-0013) and a major grant to the Understanding Risk research group from the Leverhulme Trust (F/00 407/AG). Further support was received from Horizon Digital Economy Research, RCUK grant (EP/G065802/1). The authors also wish to thank D. Venables, N. Vaughan and Ipsos MORI for assistance with the survey.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the survey used within the work presented. A.S., N.F.P. and W.P. organized and managed the data collection. A.S. analysed the data. A.S. led in writing the paper, developing this with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Spence or N. F. Pidgeon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 370 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. et al. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Clim Change 1, 46–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing