Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Small molecules that delay S phase suppress a zebrafish bmyb mutant

Abstract

Bmyb is a ubiquitously expressed transcription factor involved in cellular proliferation and cancer1,2,3,4. Loss of bmyb function in the zebrafish mutant crash&burn (crb) results in decreased cyclin B1 expression, mitotic arrest and genome instability5. These phenotypic observations in crb mutants could be attributed to the decreased expression of cyclin B1, a cell-cycle regulatory protein that is responsible for driving cell progression from G2 through mitosis. To identify small molecules that interact with the bmyb pathway, we developed an embryo-based suppressor screening strategy. In 16 weeks we screened a diverse 16,000 compound library, and discovered one previously unknown compound, persynthamide (psy, 1), that suppressed bmyb-dependent mitotic defects. Psy- treated embryos showed an S-phase delay, and knockdown of the cell-cycle checkpoint regulator ataxia telangiectasia—and Rad-related kinase (ATR) abrogated the suppression of crb. The DNA synthesis inhibitors aphidicolin (2) and hydroxyurea (3) also suppressed crb. S-phase inhibition upregulated cyclin B1 mRNA, promoting the progression of cells through mitosis. Our study demonstrates that chemical suppressor screening in zebrafish can identify compounds with cell-cycle activity and can be used to identify pathways that interact with specific cell-cycle phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Persynthamide (psy) suppresses mitotic accumulation in crb mutants.
Figure 2: Psy suppresses many aspects of the crb phenotype.
Figure 3: Psy suppresses crb by delaying cells in S phase.
Figure 4: crb is suppressed by activation of the intra–S-phase checkpoint.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sala, A. & Watson, R. B-Myb protein in cellular proliferation, transcription control, and cancer: latest developments. J. Cell. Physiol. 179, 245–250 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh, I.H. & Reddy, E.P. The myb gene family in cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis. Oncogene 18, 3017–3033 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joaquin, M. & Watson, R.J. Cell cycle regulation by the B-Myb transcription factor. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60, 2389–2401 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessa, M., Joaquin, M., Tavner, F., Saville, M.K. & Watson, R.J. Regulation of the cell cycle by B-Myb. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 27, 416–421 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepard, J.L. et al. A zebrafish bmyb mutation causes genome instability and increased cancer susceptibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13194–13199 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peterson, R.T., Link, B.A., Dowling, J.E. & Schreiber, S.L. Small molecule developmental screens reveal the logic and timing of vertebrate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12965–12969 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khersonsky, S.M. et al. Facilitated forward chemical genetics using a tagged triazine library and zebrafish embryo screening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11804–11805 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hendzel, M.J. et al. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106, 348–360 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasevicius, A. & Ekker, S.C. Effective targeted gene 'knockdown' in zebrafish. Nat. Genet. 26, 216–220 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feijoo, C. et al. Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing. J. Cell Biol. 154, 913–923 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorensen, C.S. et al. Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3, 247–258 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zou, L. & Elledge, S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Donaldson, A.D. & Blow, J.J. DNA replication: stable driving prevents fatal smashes. Curr. Biol. 11, R979–R982 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tercero, J.A., Longhese, M.P. & Diffley, J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11, 1323–1336 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiloh, Y. ATM and ATR: networking cellular responses to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 71–77 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Costanzo, V. et al. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 11, 203–213 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortez, D. Caffeine inhibits checkpoint responses without inhibiting the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 37139–37145 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Okada, M., Akimaru, H., Hou, D.X., Takahashi, T. & Ishii, S. Myb controls G(2)/M progression by inducing cyclin B expression in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. EMBO J. 21, 675–684 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, W., Giangrande, P.H. & Nevins, J.R. E2Fs link the control of G1/S and G2/M transcription. EMBO J. 23, 4615–4626 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stern, H.M. & Zon, L.I. Cancer genetics and drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 533–539 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. MacRae, C.A. & Peterson, R.T. Zebrafish-based small molecule discovery. Chem. Biol. 10, 901–908 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pichler, F.B. et al. Chemical discovery and global gene expression analysis in zebrafish. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 879–883 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson, R.T., Mably, J.D., Chen, J.N. & Fishman, M.C. Convergence of distinct pathways to heart patterning revealed by the small molecule concentramide and the mutation heart-and-soul. Curr. Biol. 11, 1481–1491 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson, R.T. et al. Chemical suppression of a genetic mutation in a zebrafish model of aortic coarctation. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 595–599 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berghmans, S. et al. tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 407–412 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Amsterdam, A. et al. Many ribosomal protein genes are cancer genes in zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 2, E139 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Langenau, D.M. et al. Myc-induced T cell leukemia in transgenic zebrafish. Science 299, 887–890 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Patton, E.E. et al. BRAF mutations are sufficient to promote nevi formation and cooperate with p53 in the genesis of melanoma. Curr. Biol. 15, 249–254 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank D. Hayes, J. Follen and C. Shamu for help with small-molecule screening, T. Mitchison for helpful advice, and C. Burns, J. DeCaprio, N. Dyson, I. Hariharan and W. Kaelin for critical comments on the manuscript. We also thank R. Finley for help with in situ hybridization, R. Wingert for providing reagents and C. Belair and B. Barut for expert laboratory management. This work was supported by NIH grants 5K08 DK061849 (H.M.S.), 1R01 DK55381 (L.I.Z.), 1R01 HD044930 (L.I.Z.) and 5K08 HL04082 (J.F.A.). L.I.Z. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard I Zon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the screen. (PDF 946 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Confirmation of chemical composition of persynthamide. (PDF 289 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Persynthamide is required during a specific developmental time window to suppress crb. (PDF 129 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Counts of spindles and centrosomes in tails of psy-treated and untreated embryos. (PDF 737 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Persynthamide-, aphidocolin- and hydroxyurea- treated embryos have similar gene expression profiles. (PDF 914 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 6

Cyclin B1 levels are upregulated by S-phase inhibitors. (PDF 592 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 7

Model of how S-phase delay via the intra-S-phase checkpoint may suppress the bmyb loss of function mutant crb by increasing cyclin B1 message. (PDF 1028 kb)

Supplementary Methods (DOC 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, H., Murphey, R., Shepard, J. et al. Small molecules that delay S phase suppress a zebrafish bmyb mutant. Nat Chem Biol 1, 366–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio749

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing