Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Local and macroscopic electrostatic interactions in single α-helices

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 18 August 2015

This article has been updated

Abstract

The noncovalent forces that stabilize protein structures are not fully understood. One way to address this is to study equilibria between unfolded states and α-helices in peptides. Electrostatic forces—which include interactions between side chains, the backbone and side chains, and side chains and the helix macrodipole—are believed to contribute to these equilibria. Here we probe these interactions experimentally using designed peptides. We find that both terminal backbone–side chain and certain side chain–side chain interactions (which include both local effects between proximal charges and interatomic contacts) contribute much more to helix stability than side chain–helix macrodipole electrostatics, which are believed to operate at larger distances. This has implications for current descriptions of helix stability, the understanding of protein folding and the refinement of force fields for biomolecular modeling and simulations. In addition, this study sheds light on the stability of rod-like structures formed by single α-helices, which are common in natural proteins such as non-muscle myosins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Electrostatic interactions in the α-helix.
Figure 2: Helicities of the designed peptides in solution.
Figure 3: Locating α-helical structure by NMR spectroscopy.
Figure 4: Side chain interactions observed in α-helices from the Protein Data Bank.
Figure 5: Electrostatic potential of a model α-helix.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 05 June 2015

    In the version of this article initially published, two pairs of citations of Figures 4b and 4c were inadvertently switched. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Dill, K.A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 29, 7133–7155 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pauling, L., Corey, R.B. & Branson, H.R. The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37, 205–211 (1951).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett, G.J., Choudhary, A., Raines, R.T. & Woolfson, D.N. n→π* interactions in proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 615–620 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett, G.J., Newberry, R.W., VanVeller, B., Raines, R.T. & Woolfson, D.N. Interplay of hydrogen bonds and n→π* interactions in proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18682–18688 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bierzynski, A., Kim, P.S. & Baldwin, R.L. A salt bridge stabilizes the helix formed by isolated C-peptide of RNase-A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2470–2474 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, P.S. & Baldwin, R.L. A helix stop signal in the isolated S-peptide of ribonuclease-A. Nature 307, 329–334 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marqusee, S. & Baldwin, R.L. Helix stabilization by Glu···Lys+ salt bridges in short peptides of de novo design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8898–8902 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson, J.S. & Richardson, D.C. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of α-helices. Science 240, 1648–1652 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doig, A.J. & Baldwin, R.L. N- and C-capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α-helical peptides. Protein Sci. 4, 1325–1336 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pace, C.N. & Scholtz, M.J. A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins. Biophys. J. 75, 422–427 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Penel, S., Hughes, E. & Doig, A.J. Side-chain structures in the first turn of the α-helix. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 127–143 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iqbalsyah, T.M. & Doig, A.J. Anticooperativity in a Glu−Lys−Glu salt bridge triplet in an isolated α-helical peptide. Biochemistry 44, 10449–10456 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spek, E.J., Bui, A.H., Lu, M. & Kallenbach, N.R. Surface salt bridges stabilize the GCN4 leucine zipper. Protein Sci. 7, 2431–2437 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayne, L. et al. Stabilizing effect of a multiple salt bridge in a prenucleated peptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 10643–10645 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olson, C.A., Spek, E.J., Shi, Z.S., Vologodskii, A. & Kallenbach, N.R. Cooperative helix stabilization by complex Arg-Glu salt bridges. Proteins 44, 123–132 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scholtz, J.M., Qian, H., Robbins, V.H. & Baldwin, R.L. The energetics of ion-pair and hydrogen-bonding interactions in a helical peptide. Biochemistry 32, 9668–9676 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoemaker, K.R., Kim, P.S., York, E.J., Stewart, J.M. & Baldwin, R.L. Tests of the helix dipole model for stabilization of α-helices. Nature 326, 563–567 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong, K.M. & Baldwin, R.L. Charged histidine affects α-helix stability at all positions in the helix by interacting with the backbone charges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11337–11340 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wada, A. The α-helix as an electric macro-dipole. Adv. Biophys. 1–63 (1976).

  20. Hol, W.G.J., van Duijnen, P.T. & Berendsen, H.J.C. The α-helix dipole and the properties of proteins. Nature 273, 443–446 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chakrabarti, P. An assessment of the effect of the helix dipole in protein structures. Protein Eng. 7, 471–474 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun, D.P., Sauer, U., Nicholson, H. & Matthews, B.W. Contributions of engineered surface salt bridges to the stability of T4 lysozyme determined by directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry 30, 7142–7153 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lumb, K.J. & Kim, P.S. Measurement of interhelical electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper. Science 268, 436–439 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lavigne, P., Sönnichsen, F.D., Kay, C.M. & Hodges, K.J. Interhelical salt bridges, coiled-coil stability, and specificity of dimerization. Science 271, 1136–1138 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aqvist, J., Luecke, H., Quiocho, F.A. & Warshel, A. Dipoles localized at helix termini of proteins stabilize charges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2026–2030 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, C.L. et al. A long helix from the central region of smooth muscle caldesmon. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13958–13963 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spink, B.J., Sivaramakrishnan, S., Lipfert, J., Doniach, S. & Spudich, J.A. Long single α-helical tail domains bridge the gap between structure and function of myosin VI. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 591–597 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, Y. et al. A FERM domain autoregulates Drosophila myosin 7a activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4189–4194 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Knight, P.J. et al. The predicted coiled-coil domain of myosin 10 forms a novel elongated domain that lengthens the head. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34702–34708 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peckham, M. & Knight, P.J. When a predicted coiled coil is really a single α-helix, in myosins and other proteins. Soft Matter 5, 2493–2503 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Süveges, D., Gáspári, Z., Tóth, G. & Nyitray, L. Charged single α-helix: A versatile protein structural motif. Proteins, Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 74, 905–916 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gáspári, Z., Suveges, D., Perczel, A., Nyitray, L. & Toth, G. Charged single alpha-helices in proteomes revealed by a consensus prediction approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1824, 637–646 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peckham, M. Coiled coils and SAH domains in cytoskeletal molecular motors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39, 1142–1148 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sivaramakrishnan, S., Spink, B.J., Sim, A.Y.L., Doniach, S. & Spudich, J.A. Dynamic charge interactions create surprising rigidity in the ER/K α-helical protein motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13356–13361 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lyu, P.C.C., Gans, P.J. & Kallenbach, N.R. Energetic contribution of solvent-exposed ion-pairs to α-helix structure. J. Mol. Biol. 223, 343–350 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cochran, D.A.E., Penel, S. & Doig, A.J. Effect of the N1 residue on the stability of the α-helix for all 20 amino acids. Protein Sci. 10, 463–470 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cochran, D.A.E. & Doig, A.J. Effect of the N2 residue on the stability of the α-helix for all 20 amino acids. Protein Sci. 10, 1305–1311 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Iqbalsyah, T.M. & Doig, A.J. Effect of the N3 residue on the stability of the α-helix. Protein Sci. 13, 32–39 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Walter, S., Hubner, B., Hahn, U. & Schmid, F.X. Destabilization of a protein helix by electrostatic interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 252, 133–143 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Scholtz, J.M. et al. Calorimetric determination of the enthalpy change for the α-helix to coil transition of an alanine peptide in water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2854–2858 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernández-Recio, J. & Sancho, J. Intrahelical side chain interactions in α-helices: poor correlation between energetics and frequency. FEBS Lett. 429, 99–103 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. de Sousa, M.M. et al. Amino acid pair- and triplet-wise groupings in the interior of α-helical segments in proteins. J. Theor. Biol. 271, 136–144 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Berman, H.M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. McDonald, I.K. & Thornton, J.M. Satisfying hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238, 777–793 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lacroix, E., Viguera, A.R. & Serrano, L. Elucidating the folding problem of α-helices: local motifs, long-range electrostatics, ionic-strength dependence and prediction of NMR parameters. J. Mol. Biol. 284, 173–191 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sivaramakrishnan, S. & Spudich, J.A. Systematic control of protein interaction using a modular ER/K α-helix linker. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20467–20472 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Baboolal, T.G. et al. The SAH domain extends the functional length of the myosin lever. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22193–22198 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Scholtz, J.M., Qian, H., York, E.J., Stewart, J.M. & Baldwin, R.L. Parameters of helix-coil transition theory for alanine-based peptides of varying chain lengths in water. Biopolymers 31, 1463–1470 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Myers, J.K., Pace, C.N. & Scholtz, J.M. A direct comparison of helix propensity in proteins and peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2833–2837 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Greenfield, N.J. Using circular dichroism collected as a function of temperature to determine the thermodynamics of protein unfolding and binding interactions. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2527–2535 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Gorbet, G. et al. A parametrically constrained optimization method for fitting sedimentation velocity experiments. Biophys. J. 106, 1741–1750 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kjaergaard, M., Brander, S. & Poulsen, F.M. Random coil chemical shift for intrinsically disordered proteins: effects of temperature and pH. J. Biomol. NMR 49, 139–149 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kjaergaard, M. & Poulsen, F.M. Sequence correction of random coil chemical shifts: correlation between neighbor correction factors and changes in the Ramachandran distribution. J. Biomol. NMR 50, 157–165 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, G. & Dunbrack, R.L. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19, 1589–1591 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hutchinson, E.G. & Thornton, J.M. PROMOTIF—A program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins. Protein Sci. 5, 212–220 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Thomas, A., Milon, A. & Brasseur, R. Partial atomic charges of amino acids in proteins. Proteins, Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 56, 102–109 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.N.W. would like to dedicate this paper to the memory of Prof. Dudley H. William FRS, an inspirational scientist, mentor and person. We are grateful to the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK for a studentship to E.G.B. and the EPSRC/National Science Foundation (EP/J001430) for a grant to D.N.W. that funded G.J.B. D.N.W. holds a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award. We thank C. Wood for a script to align helical axes; M. Peckham and A. Mulholland, and members of the Woolfson and Faul groups, for helpful discussions; and S. Whittaker and the Henry Wellcome Building NMR facility at the University of Birmingham for access to the Wellcome Trust–funded 900 MHz spectrometer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.G.B., C.F.J.F. and D.N.W. designed the research; E.G.B. made the synthetic peptides and performed the CD spectroscopy; M.P.C. and E.G.B. collected and analyzed the NMR data; G.J.B., E.G.B. and D.N.W. performed the bioinformatics; E.G.B. and R.B.S. constructed and analyzed atomistic models for the peptides; N.L. performed and analyzed the helix-dipole calculations; E.G.B., G.J.B. and D.N.W. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek N Woolfson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Results, Supplementary Figures 1–43 and Supplementary Tables 1–9. (PDF 6678 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, E., Bartlett, G., Crump, M. et al. Local and macroscopic electrostatic interactions in single α-helices. Nat Chem Biol 11, 221–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1739

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1739

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing