Abstract
Proteins are the molecular machines of the cell that fold into specific three-dimensional structures to fulfill their functions. To improve our understanding of how the structure and function of proteins arises, it is crucial to understand how evolution has generated the structural diversity we observe today. Classically, proteins that adopt different folds are considered to be nonhomologous. However, using state-of-the-art tools for homology detection, we found evidence of homology between proteins of two ancient and highly populated protein folds, the (βα)8-barrel and the flavodoxin-like fold. We detected a family of sequences that show intermediate features between both folds and determined what is to our knowledge the first representative crystal structure of one of its members, giving new insights into the evolutionary link of two of the earliest folds. Our findings contribute to an emergent vision where protein superfolds share common ancestry and encourage further approaches to complete the mapping of structure space onto sequence space.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doolittle, R.F. Similar amino acid sequences: chance or common ancestry? Science 214, 149–159 (1981).
Chothia, C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357, 543–544 (1992).
McLaughlin, R.N. Jr., Poelwijk, F.J., Raman, A., Gosal, W.S. & Ranganathan, R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 491, 138–142 (2012).
Huang, J., Koide, A., Makabe, K. & Koide, S. Design of protein function leaps by directed domain interface evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6578–6583 (2008).
Koga, N. et al. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491, 222–227 (2012).
Orengo, C.A., Jones, D.T. & Thornton, J.M. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372, 631–634 (1994).
Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. & Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 536–540 (1995).
Holm, L. & Sander, C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273, 595–603 (1996).
Murzin, A.G. How far divergent evolution goes in proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 380–387 (1998).
Grishin, N.V. Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol. 134, 167–185 (2001).
Lupas, A.N., Ponting, C.P. & Russell, R.B. On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? J. Struct. Biol. 134, 191–203 (2001).
Roessler, C.G. et al. Transitive homology-guided structural studies lead to discovery of Cro proteins with 40% sequence identity but different folds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2343–2348 (2008).
Ammelburg, M. et al. A CTP-dependent archaeal riboflavin kinase forms a bridge in the evolution of cradle-loop barrels. Structure 15, 1577–1590 (2007).
Höcker, B., Schmidt, S. & Sterner, R. A common evolutionary origin of two elementary enzyme folds. FEBS Lett. 510, 133–135 (2002).
Altschul, S.F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Söding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21, 951–960 (2005).
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A. & Söding, J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods 9, 173–175 (2012).
Alva, V., Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Lupas, A.N. & Söding, J. A galaxy of folds. Protein Sci. 19, 124–130 (2010).
Sterner, R. & Höcker, B. Catalytic versatility, stability, and evolution of the (βα)8-barrel enzyme fold. Chem. Rev. 105, 4038–4055 (2005).
Jiang, L. et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319, 1387–1391 (2008).
Röthlisberger, D. et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453, 190–195 (2008).
Privett, H.K. et al. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3790–3795 (2012).
Höcker, B., Claren, J. & Sterner, R. Mimicking enzyme evolution by generating new (βα)8-barrels from (βα)4-half-barrels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16448–16453 (2004).
Bharat, T.A., Eisenbeis, S., Zeth, K. & Höcker, B. A βα-barrel built by the combination of fragments from different folds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9942–9947 (2008).
Eisenbeis, S. et al. Potential of fragment recombination for rational design of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4019–4022 (2012).
Bollen, Y.J. & van Mierlo, C.P. Protein topology affects the appearance of intermediates during the folding of proteins with a flavodoxin-like fold. Biophys. Chem. 114, 181–189 (2005).
Nelson, E.D. & Grishin, N.V. Alternate pathways for folding in the flavodoxin fold family revealed by a nucleation-growth model. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 646–653 (2006).
Hills, R.D. Jr. et al. Topological frustration in βα-repeat proteins: sequence diversity modulates the conserved folding mechanisms of αβα sandwich proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 332–350 (2010).
Yuan, J., Branch, R.W., Hosu, B.G. & Berg, H.C. Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway. Nature 484, 233–236 (2012).
Drennan, C.L., Huang, S., Drummond, J.T., Matthews, R.G. & Lidwig, M.L. How a protein binds B12: A 3.0 Å X-ray structure of B12-binding domains of methionine synthase. Science 266, 1669–1674 (1994).
Caetano-Anollés, G., Kim, H.S. & Mittenthal, J.E. The origin of modern metabolic networks inferred from phylogenomic analysis of protein architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9358–9363 (2007).
Koonin, E.V., Wolf, Y.I. & Karev, G.P. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420, 218–223 (2002).
Ma, B.G. et al. Characters of very ancient proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 366, 607–611 (2008).
Copley, R.R. & Bork, P. Homology among (βα)8 barrels: implications for the evolution of metabolic pathways. J. Mol. Biol. 303, 627–641 (2000).
Nagano, N., Orengo, C.A. & Thornton, J.M. One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol. 321, 741–765 (2002).
Kopec, K.O. & Lupas, A.N. β-Propeller blades as ancestral peptides in protein evolution. PLoS ONE 8, e77074 (2013).
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Linke, D., Lupas, A.N. & Söding, J. Evolution of outer membrane β-barrels from an ancestral ββ hairpin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1348–1358 (2010).
Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D348–D352 (2013).
Sander, C. & Schneider, R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9, 56–68 (1991).
Rost, B. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85–94 (1999).
Alifano, P. et al. Histidine biosynthetic pathway and genes: structure, regulation, and evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 44–69 (1996).
Lang, D., Thoma, R., Henn-Sax, M., Sterner, R. & Wilmanns, M. Structural evidence for evolution of the β/α barrel scaffold by gene duplication and fusion. Science 289, 1546–1550 (2000).
Höcker, B., Beismann-Driemeyer, S., Hettwer, S., Lustig, A. & Sterner, R. Dissection of a (βα)8-barrel enzyme into two folded halves. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 32–36 (2001).
Claren, J., Malisi, C., Höcker, B. & Sterner, R. Establishing wild-type levels of catalytic activity on natural and artificial (βα)8-barrel protein scaffolds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3704–3709 (2009).
Söding, J., Remmert, M. & Biegert, A. HHrep: de novo protein repeat detection and the origin of TIM barrels. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W137–W142 (2006).
Richter, M. et al. Computational and experimental evidence for the evolution of a (βα)8-barrel protein from an ancestral quarter-barrel stabilised by disulfide bonds. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 763–773 (2010).
Cech, T.R. The RNA worlds in context. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a006742 (2012).
Höcker, B. Structural biology: a toolbox for protein design. Nature 491, 204–205 (2012).
Söding, J., Biegert, A. & Lupas, A.N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W244–W248 (2005).
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2302–2309 (2005).
Frickey, T. & Lupas, A. CLANS: a Java application for visualizing protein families based on pairwise similarity. Bioinformatics 20, 3702–3704 (2004).
Biegert, A., Mayer, C., Remmert, M., Söding, J. & Lupas, A.N. The MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit for protein sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W335–W339 (2006).
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268 (2004).
Krauth-Siegel, R.L. et al. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of trypanothione reductase from Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas' disease. FEBS Lett. 317, 105–108 (1993).
Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008).
Rice, L.M., Earnest, T.N. & Brunger, A.T. Single-wavelength anomalous diffraction phasing revisited. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 56, 1413–1420 (2000).
Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M. & Paciorek, W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 2023–2030 (2003).
Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 (2006).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Toledo-Patiño, V. Alva and J. Söding for discussions. We are grateful to the crystallography community at the Max Planck Institute for their support. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant HO 4022/1-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A.F.-R. and B.H. designed the research; J.A.F.-R. performed the experiments; J.A.F.-R., S.S. and B.H. analyzed the data; and J.A.F.-R. and B.H. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Results, Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. (PDF 13146 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farías-Rico, J., Schmidt, S. & Höcker, B. Evolutionary relationship of two ancient protein superfolds. Nat Chem Biol 10, 710–715 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1579
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1579
This article is cited by
-
Master Blaster: an approach to sensitive identification of remotely related proteins
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Comparing proteins and nucleic acids for next-generation biomolecular engineering
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2018)
-
Baukasten der Natur: neue Proteine aus konservierten Fragmenten
BIOspektrum (2017)
-
De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy
Nature Chemical Biology (2016)
-
Getting to the bottom of the TIM barrel
Nature Chemical Biology (2016)