Article | Published:

Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide

Nature Chemistry volume 2, pages 581587 (2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

The excellent electrical, optical and mechanical properties of graphene have driven the search to find methods for its large-scale production, but established procedures (such as mechanical exfoliation or chemical vapour deposition) are not ideal for the manufacture of processable graphene sheets. An alternative method is the reduction of graphene oxide, a material that shares the same atomically thin structural framework as graphene, but bears oxygen-containing functional groups. Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to study the atomistic structure of progressively reduced graphene oxide. The chemical changes of oxygen-containing functional groups on the annealing of graphene oxide are elucidated and the simulations reveal the formation of highly stable carbonyl and ether groups that hinder its complete reduction to graphene. The calculations are supported by infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements. Finally, more effective reduction treatments to improve the reduction of graphene oxide are proposed.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442, 282–286 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. Evolution of surface functional groups in a series of progressively oxidized graphite oxides. Chem. Mater. 18, 2740–2749 (2006).

  3. 3.

    , & Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 8, 323–327 (2007).

  4. 4.

    et al. Evaluation of solution-processed reduced graphene oxide films as transparent conductors. ACS Nano 2, 463–470 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , & Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nature Nanotech. 3, 270–274 (2008).

  6. 6.

    et al. Evolution of electrical, chemical, and structural properties of transparent and conducting chemically derived graphene thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2577–2583 (2009).

  7. 7.

    , , & Tunable electrical conductivity of individual graphene oxide sheets reduced at ‘low’ temperatures. Nano Lett. 8, 4283–4287 (2008).

  8. 8.

    et al. Electronic transport properties of individual chemically reduced graphene oxide sheets. Nano Lett. 7, 3499–3503 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , , , & The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).

  10. 10.

    , , & Approaching ballistic transport in suspended graphene. Nature Nanotech. 3, 491–495 (2008).

  11. 11.

    et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45, 1558–1565 (2007).

  12. 12.

    et al. Graphite oxide: chemical reduction to graphite and surface modification with primary aliphatic amines and amino acids. Langmuir 19, 6050–6055 (2003).

  13. 13.

    et al. Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1987–1992 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , , & Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 4477–4482 (1998).

  15. 15.

    , & DRIFT study of deuterium-exchanged graphite oxide. Carbon 43, 3186–3189 (2005).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Infrared spectroscopy of carbon materials: a quantum chemical study of model compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6350–6359 (2003).

  17. 17.

    & Formation process and structure of graphite oxide. Carbon 32, 469–475 (1994).

  18. 18.

    & Über die säurenatur und die methylierung von graphitoxyd. Ber. Dtsch Chem. Ges. 72, 754–771 (1939).

  19. 19.

    & Untersuchungen am graphitoxid. VI. Betrachtungen zur struktur des graphitoxids. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 369, 327–340 (1969).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Study of oxygen-containing groups in a series of graphite oxides: physical and chemical characterization. Carbon 33, 1585–1592 (1995).

  21. 21.

    On the atomic weight of graphite. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 149, 249–259 (1859).

  22. 22.

    Verfahren zur darstellung der graphitsaure. Ber. Dtsch Chem. Ges. 31, 1481–1487 (1898).

  23. 23.

    , & Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339 (1958).

  24. 24.

    , , & The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 228–240 (2010).

  25. 25.

    , & Preparation and characterization of ultrathin films layer-by-layer self-assembled from graphite oxide nanoplatelets and polymers. Langmuir 16, 7318–7324 (2000).

  26. 26.

    , , & Enhanced acidity and pH-dependent surface charge characterization of successively oxidized graphite oxides. Carbon 44, 537–545 (2006).

  27. 27.

    et al. Synthesis and solid-state NMR structural characterization of 13C-labeled graphite oxide. Science 321, 1815–1817 (2008).

  28. 28.

    , , & A new structural model for graphite oxide. Chem. Phys. Lett. 287, 53–56 (1998).

  29. 29.

    & Infra-red spectra of graphitic oxide. Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 1614–1620 (1955).

  30. 30.

    et al. High mobility, printable, and solution-processed graphene electronics. Nano Lett. 10, 92–98 (2010).

  31. 31.

    et al. Chemical vapor deposition repair of graphene oxide: a route to highly-conductive graphene monolayers. Adv. Mater. 21, 4683–4686 (2009).

  32. 32.

    , & Precursors to the cyclo[n]carbons: from 3,4-dialkynyl-3-cyclobutene-1,2-diones and 3,4-dialkynyl-3-cyclobutene-1,2-diols to cyclobutenodehydroannulenes and higher oxides of carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 1607–1617 (2002).

  33. 33.

    et al. Cluster-beam deposition and in situ characterization of carbyne-rich carbon films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 285506 (2002).

  34. 34.

    & Thermal stability of graphene edge structure and graphene nanoflakes. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 094707 (2008).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Deriving carbon atomic chains from graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 205501 (2009).

  36. 36.

    , , & ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396–9409 (2001).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Simulations on the thermal decomposition of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) polymer using the ReaxFF reactive force field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 7192–7202 (2005).

  38. 38.

    , & ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 1040–1053 (2008).

  39. 39.

    & Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  40. 40.

    & Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  41. 41.

    & From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  42. 42.

    , & Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  43. 43.

    et al. Surface-modified carbon nanotubes catalyze oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane. Science 322, 73–77 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Nanoelectronic Research Initiative through the Brown University Materials Research Science and Engineering Center program and from the NSF through grants CMMI-0825771 and CMMI-0855853. We thank N. Medhekar, R. Grantab and I. Milas for discussions and suggestions. Computational support for this research was provided by the grant TG-DMR090098 from the TeraGrid advanced support program and the Center for Computation and Visualization at Brown University. M.C. and C.M. acknowledge financial support from the Jacobs Chair Funds at Rutgers University and an NSF CAREER Award (ECS 0543867). The work at University of Texas Dallas was supported by the SWAN-NRI program and Texas Instruments.

Author information

Author notes

    • Cecilia Mattevi
    •  & Manish Chhowalla

    Present address: Department of Materials, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Affiliations

  1. Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA

    • Akbar Bagri
    •  & Vivek B. Shenoy
  2. Rutgers University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 USA

    • Cecilia Mattevi
    •  & Manish Chhowalla
  3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA

    • Muge Acik
    •  & Yves J. Chabal

Authors

  1. Search for Akbar Bagri in:

  2. Search for Cecilia Mattevi in:

  3. Search for Muge Acik in:

  4. Search for Yves J. Chabal in:

  5. Search for Manish Chhowalla in:

  6. Search for Vivek B. Shenoy in:

Contributions

V.B.S. and M.C. conceived the project, A.B. and V.B.S. conducted the MD simulations and first-principles calculations with input from C.M. and M.C., M.A and Y.C. performed the FTIR spectroscopy measurements and analysis, M.C., C.M. and V.B.S. wrote the manuscript with input from Y.C. and M.A. All of the authors read and approved the contents of the manuscript prior to submission. A.B. and C.M. contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek B. Shenoy.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.686

Further reading