Michelle Francl wonders why people almost inevitably draw scientists as men with weird hair and glasses, and why there is no such thing as a 'draw a lawyer' test.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Chambers, D. W. Sci. Educ. 67, 255–265 (1983).
Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B. & Cramond, B. L. School Sci. Math. 95, 195–205 (1995).
Rahm, J. & Charbonneau Am. J. Phys. 65, 774–778 (1997).
Dam, H. J. W. McClure's Magazine 6, 403–415 (1896).
Gillies, J. Aristotle's Ethics and Politics: Comprising his Practical Philosophy Vol. 1 (Cadell & Davies, 1813).
Galton, F. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture (D. Appleton & Co., 1875).
Roe, A. The Making of a Scientist (Dodd, Mead & Co., 1953).
Mead, M. & Métraux, R. Science 126, 384–390 (1957).
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, Pew Report on Science 2009 (National Science Foundation, 2009); available at http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/528.pdf.
Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1767–1778 (2009).
Barnett, L. Life Magazine 10, 121–138 (1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francl, M. Men of mystery. Nature Chem 2, 68–70 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.521
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.521
