Article | Published:

Emergence of a catalytic tetrad during evolution of a highly active artificial aldolase

Nature Chemistry volume 9, pages 5056 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Designing catalysts that achieve the rates and selectivities of natural enzymes is a long-standing goal in protein chemistry. Here, we show that an ultrahigh-throughput droplet-based microfluidic screening platform can be used to improve a previously optimized artificial aldolase by an additional factor of 30 to give a >109 rate enhancement that rivals the efficiency of class I aldolases. The resulting enzyme catalyses a reversible aldol reaction with high stereoselectivity and tolerates a broad range of substrates. Biochemical and structural studies show that catalysis depends on a Lys-Tyr-Asn-Tyr tetrad that emerged adjacent to a computationally designed hydrophobic pocket during directed evolution. This constellation of residues is poised to activate the substrate by Schiff base formation, promote mechanistically important proton transfers and stabilize multiple transition states along a complex reaction coordinate. The emergence of such a sophisticated catalytic centre shows that there is nothing magical about the catalytic activities or mechanisms of naturally occurring enzymes, or the evolutionary process that gave rise to them.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Class I aldolases: substrate specificity, mechanism, inhibitors and structural aspects. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 63, 301–340 (1995).

  2. 2.

    , & Recent advances in aldolase-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis. Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 1308–1320 (2007).

  3. 3.

    , , & Recent progress in stereoselective synthesis with aldolases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 154–167 (2010).

  4. 4.

    , , & Engineering aldolases as biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 19, 25–33 (2014).

  5. 5.

    , , & Asymmetric enamine catalysis. Chem. Rev. 107, 5471–5569 (2007).

  6. 6.

    , , , & A rationally designed aldolase foldamer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 922–925 (2009).

  7. 7.

    , & Development of small designer aldolase enzymes:  catalytic activity, folding, and substrate specificity. Biochemistry 44, 7583–7592 (2005).

  8. 8.

    , & Efficient aldolase catalytic antibodies that use the enamine mechanism of natural enzymes. Science 270, 1797–1800 (1995).

  9. 9.

    et al. Immune versus natural selection: antibody aldolases with enzymic rates but broader scope. Science 278, 2085–2092 (1997).

  10. 10.

    et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319, 1387–1391 (2008).

  11. 11.

    et al. Robust design and optimization of retroaldol enzymes. Protein Sci. 21, 717–726 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 494–498 (2013).

  13. 13.

    , , & Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. Lab Chip 12, 2146–2155 (2012).

  14. 14.

    & Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 652–656 (1998).

  15. 15.

    et al. Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4004–4009 (2010).

  16. 16.

    et al. Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. Lab Chip 9, 1850–1858 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. Picoliter cell lysate assays in microfluidic droplet compartments for directed enzyme evolution. Chem. Biol. 19, 1001–1009 (2012).

  18. 18.

    , , & Reliable microfluidic on-chip incubation of droplets in delay-lines. Lab Chip 9, 1344–1348 (2009).

  19. 19.

    et al. Precision is essential for efficient catalysis in an evolved Kemp eliminase. Nature 503, 418–421 (2013).

  20. 20.

    & Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. Biochemistry 15, 5631–5640 (1976).

  21. 21.

    et al. Structural and functional analysis of aldolase B mutants related to hereditary fructose intolerance. FEBS Lett. 531, 152–156 (2002).

  22. 22.

    et al. Observation of covalent intermediates in an enzyme mechanism at atomic resolution. Science 294, 369–374 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , , & Divergent evolution of (βα)8-barrel enzymes. Biol. Chem. 382, 1315–1320 (2001).

  24. 24.

    , & One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol. 321, 741–765 (2002).

  25. 25.

    et al. Characterization, kinetics, and crystal structures of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from the human parasite, Giardia lamblia. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 4859–4867 (2007).

  26. 26.

    , , & Mechanism of the Schiff base forming fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase:  structural analysis of reaction intermediates. Biochemistry 44, 4222–4229 (2005).

  27. 27.

    , & Origins of catalysis by computationally designed retroaldolase enzymes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4937–4942 (2010).

  28. 28.

    et al. The use of enzymes in organic synthesis and the life sciences: perspectives from the Swiss Industrial Biocatalysis Consortium (SIBC). Catal. Sci. Technol. 3, 29–40 (2013).

  29. 29.

    et al. Design of activated serine-containing catalytic triads with atomic-level accuracy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 386–391 (2014).

  30. 30.

    , & Mechanisms of protein evolution and their application to protein engineering. Adv. Enzymol. Areas Mol. Biol. 75, 193–239 (2007).

  31. 31.

    , & A promiscuous de novo retro-aldolase catalyzes asymmetric Michael additions via Schiff base intermediates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 5609–5612 (2015).

  32. 32.

    , & Fast Knoevenagel condensations catalyzed by an artificial Schiff-base-forming enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6972–6974 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Design of protein catalysts. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 447–470 (2013).

  34. 34.

    , & Investigating and engineering enzymes by genetic selection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 3310–3335 (2001).

  35. 35.

    & Ultrahigh-throughput FACS-based screening for directed enzyme evolution. ChemBioChem 10, 2704–2715 (2009).

  36. 36.

    et al. One in a million: flow cytometric sorting of single cell-lysate assays in monodisperse picolitre double emulsion droplets for directed evolution. Anal. Chem. 86, 2526–2533 (2014).

  37. 37.

    et al. High-throughput analysis and protein engineering using microcapillary arrays. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 76–81 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Chemical and biochemical strategies for the randomization of protein encoding DNA sequences: library construction methods for directed evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1448–1459 (2004).

  39. 39.

    , , , & Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77, 61–68 (1989).

  40. 40.

    & In vitro ‘sexual’ evolution through the PCR-based staggered extension process (StEP). Nat. Protocols 1, 1865–1871 (2006).

  41. 41.

    Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370, 389–391 (1994).

  42. 42.

    et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

  43. 43.

    et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 355–367 (2011).

  44. 44.

    A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112–122 (2008).

  45. 45.

    & COOT: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

  46. 46.

    & PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 1355–1363 (2004).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Stutz-Ducommun and B. Blattmann from the Protein Crystallization Core Facility at the University of Zurich and the staff at the Swiss Light Source (Paul Scherrer Institute) for outstanding technical support, as well as E. Mayot for surfactant synthesis. We are grateful to the mass spectrometry service of the Laboratory of Organic Chemistry at ETHZ and the Protein Analysis Group at the Functional Genomics Center of the University of Zurich. We thank A. Green, R. Zschoche, M. Reichen, R. Calbrix and all the members of the Hilvert and Griffiths labs for fruitful discussions. This work was generously supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (D.H.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Richard Obexer
    •  & Alexei Godina

    These authors contributed equally to the work

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland

    • Richard Obexer
    • , Alexei Godina
    • , Xavier Garrabou
    •  & Donald Hilvert
  2. Laboratory of Biochemistry, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris (ESPCI Paris), CNRS UMR 8231, 10, rue Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France

    • Alexei Godina
    •  & Andrew D. Griffiths
  3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland

    • Peer R. E. Mittl
  4. Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

    • David Baker

Authors

  1. Search for Richard Obexer in:

  2. Search for Alexei Godina in:

  3. Search for Xavier Garrabou in:

  4. Search for Peer R. E. Mittl in:

  5. Search for David Baker in:

  6. Search for Andrew D. Griffiths in:

  7. Search for Donald Hilvert in:

Contributions

D.H., A.D.G., D.B., P.R.E.M., X.G., A.G. and R.O. designed the experiments. R.O. and A.G. developed the assay and evolved retro-aldolases. R.O. and X.G. biochemically characterized the variants. X.G. performed biocatalytic aldol reactions and the synthesis of standards. P.R.E.M. and R.O. crystallized the proteins and solved their structures. The manuscript and figures were prepared by R.O., X.G., A.D.G. and D.H.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrew D. Griffiths or Donald Hilvert.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2596