Article | Published:

Stepwise growth of surface-grafted DNA nanotubes visualized at the single-molecule level

Nature Chemistry 7, 295–300 (2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

DNA nanotubes offer a high aspect ratio and rigidity, attractive attributes for the controlled assembly of hierarchically complex linear arrays. It is highly desirable to control the positioning of rungs along the backbone of the nanotubes, minimize the polydispersity in their manufacture and reduce the building costs. We report here a solid-phase synthesis methodology in which, through a cyclic scheme starting from a ‘foundation rung’ specifically bound to the surface, distinct rungs can be incorporated in a predetermined manner. Each rung is orthogonally addressable. Using fluorescently tagged rungs, single-molecule fluorescence studies demonstrated the robustness and structural fidelity of the constructs and confirmed the incorporation of the rungs in quantitative yield (>95%) at each step of the cycle. Prototype structures that consisted of up to 20 repeat units, about 450 nm in contour length, were constructed. Combined, the solid-phase synthesis strategy described and its visualization through single-molecule spectroscopy show good promise for the production of custom-made DNA nanotubes.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    An overview of structural DNA nanotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 37, 246–257 (2007).

  2. 2.

    , & Assembling materials with DNA as the guide. Science 321, 1795–1799 (2008).

  3. 3.

    et al. Loading and selective release of cargo in DNA nanotubes with longitudinal variation. Nature Chem. 2, 319–328 (2010).

  4. 4.

    et al. DNA-directed artificial light-harvesting antenna. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11985–11993 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response. Nature 483, 311–314 (2012).

  6. 6.

    , & Complex shapes self-assembled from single-stranded DNA tiles. Nature 485, 623–626 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. Self-assembly of DNA nanotubes with controllable diameters. Nature Commun. 2, 540 (2011).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Rolling circle amplification-templated DNA nanotubes show increased stability and cell penetration ability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2888–2891 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , , & Sturdier DNA nanotubes via ligation. Nano Lett. 6, 1379–1383 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. Programming DNA tube circumferences. Science 321, 824–826 (2008).

  11. 11.

    et al. Design and characterization of programmable DNA nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2864–2864 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , & DNA nanotubes self-assembled from triple-crossover tiles as templates for conductive nanowires. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 717–722 (2004).

  13. 13.

    , & DNA-nanotube-induced alignment of membrane proteins for NMR structure determination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6644–6648 (2007).

  14. 14.

    et al. Modular construction of DNA nanotubes of tunable geometry and single- or double-stranded character. Nature Nanotech. 4, 349–352 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. Simple design for DNA nanotubes from a minimal set of unmodified strands: rapid, room-temperature assembly and readily tunable structure. ACS Nano 7, 3022–3028 (2013).

  16. 16.

    & Construction of a DNA-truncated octahedron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1661–1669 (1994).

  17. 17.

    , & A practical guide to single-molecule FRET. Nature Methods 5, 507–516 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Advances in single-molecule fluorescence methods for molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 51–76 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Fluorescence spectroscopy of single biomolecules. Science 283, 1676–1683 (1999).

  20. 20.

    , , & Unraveling electronic energy transfer in single conjugated polyelectrolytes encapsulated in lipid vesicles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17480–17485 (2010).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Liposome encapsulation of conjugated polyelectrolytes: toward a liposome beacon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 457–459 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6264–6268 (1996).

  23. 23.

    & Subunit counting in membrane-bound proteins. Nature Methods 4, 319–321 (2007).

  24. 24.

    et al. Counting the number of proteins coupled to single nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12592–12593 (2007).

  25. 25.

    et al. Probing cellular protein complexes using single-molecule pull-down. Nature 473, 484–488 (2011).

  26. 26.

    , , & Fluorescence detection of the movement of single KcsA subunits reveals cooperativity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20263–20268 (2008).

  27. 27.

    et al. Single-molecule imaging of L-type Ca2+ channels in live cells. Biophys. J. 81, 2639–2646 (2001).

  28. 28.

    , , & Counting of six pRNAs of phi29 DNA-packaging motor with customized single-molecule dual-view system. EMBO J. 26, 527–537 (2007).

  29. 29.

    & Photophysics of fluorescent probes for single-molecule biophysics and super-resolution imaging. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 63, 595–617 (2012).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nature Methods 8, 1027–1036 (2011).

  31. 31.

    , , & Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 319, 810–813 (2008).

  32. 32.

    , & Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nature Methods 3, 793–795 (2006).

  33. 33.

    et al. DNA origami nanopillars as standards for three-dimensional superresolution microscopy. Nano Lett. 13, 781–785 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

G.C. and H.F.S. are thankful to the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. We are also thankful to Nanoquebec (G.C.), the Canada Institute for Health Research (CIHR) (G.C., H.F.S.) and the Canada Research Chairs program (H.F.S.). H.F.S. is a Cottrell Scholar of the Research Corporation. We are also thankful to the McGill CIHR drug-development training program (A.A.H. and Y.G.), GRASP and FRQNT (A.A.H.) and Vanier Canada (G.D.H.) for Graduate Scholarships.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Center for Self-Assembled Chemical Structures (CSACS-CRMAA), McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada

    • Amani A. Hariri
    • , Graham D. Hamblin
    • , Yasser Gidi
    • , Hanadi F. Sleiman
    •  & Gonzalo Cosa

Authors

  1. Search for Amani A. Hariri in:

  2. Search for Graham D. Hamblin in:

  3. Search for Yasser Gidi in:

  4. Search for Hanadi F. Sleiman in:

  5. Search for Gonzalo Cosa in:

Contributions

All authors contributed ideas, discussed the results and drafted the manuscript. A.A.H., G.C. and H.F.S. designed the study. G.C. and H.F.S. coordinated the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hanadi F. Sleiman or Gonzalo Cosa.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2184

Further reading