Bruce Gibb ponders what the future of chemistry research might look like if we take a more data-driven approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient?
Scientific Reports Open Access 15 June 2017
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Gothard, C. M. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7922–7927 (2012).
Kowalik, M. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7928–7932 (2012).
Fuller, P. E., Gothard, C. M., Gothard, N. A., Weckiewicz, A. & Grzybowski, B. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7933–7937 (2012).
Symes, M. D. et al. Nature Chem. 4, 349–354 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibb, B. Big (chemistry) data. Nature Chem 5, 248–249 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1604
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1604
This article is cited by
-
Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient?
Scientific Reports (2017)