Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Lies, damned lies and h-indices

Sometimes the numbers just don't add up — and Bruce Gibb explains why.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirsch, J. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egghe, L. Scientometrics 69, 131–152 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silagadze, Z. K. Acta Physica Polonica B 41, 2325–2333 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adler, R., Ewing, J. & Taylor, P. Stat. Sci. 24, 1–14 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cozzens, S. E. Scientiometrics 15, 437–477 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce C. Gibb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibb, B. Lies, damned lies and h-indices. Nature Chem 4, 513–514 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing