Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chemical intuition or chemical institution?

The e.e.s have had it, argues Bruce Gibb, and it's time to err on the side of e.r.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Counter-intuitive e.e.?



  1. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frederick, S. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 


  4. Gawley, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 71, 2411–2416 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce C. Gibb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibb, B. Chemical intuition or chemical institution?. Nature Chem 4, 237–238 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing