Article | Published:

Reversible bond formation enables the replication and amplification of a crosslinking salen complex as an orthogonal base pair

Nature Chemistry volume 3, pages 794800 (2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

The universal genetic code relies on two hydrogen-bonded Watson–Crick base pairs that can form 64 triplet codons. This places a limit on the number of amino acids that can be encoded, which has motivated efforts to create synthetic base pairs that are orthogonal to the natural ones. An additional base pair would result in another 61 triplet codons. Artificial organic base pairs have been described in enzymatic incorporation studies, and inorganic T–Hg–T and C–Ag–C base pairs have been reported to form in primer extension studies. Here, we demonstrate a metal base pair that is fully orthogonal and can be replicated, and can even be amplified by polymerase chain reaction in the presence of the canonical pairs dA:dT and dG:dC. Crystal structures of a dS–Cu–dS base pair inside a polymerase show that reversible chemistry is possible directly inside the polymerase, which enables the efficient copying of the inorganic crosslink. The results open up the possibility of replicating and amplifying artificial inorganic DNA nanostructures by extending the genetic alphabet.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Primary accessions

Referenced accessions

References

  1. 1.

    , & Generation of dynamic constitutional diversity and driven evolution in helical molecular strands under Lewis acid catalyzed component exchange. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 4902–4906 (2004).

  2. 2.

    From supramolecular chemistry towards constitutional dynamic chemistry and adaptive chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 151–160 (2007).

  3. 3.

    & Functional DNA nanotechnology: emerging applications of DNAzymes and aptamers. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 580–588 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Semisynthetic DNA–protein conjugates for biosensing and nanofabrication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1200–1216 (2010).

  5. 5.

    DNA in a material world. Nature 421, 427–431 (2003).

  6. 6.

    , & Enzymatic incorporation of a new base pair into DNA and RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 8322–8323 (1989).

  7. 7.

    , , & General nature of the genetic code for proteins. Nature 192, 1227–1232 (1961).

  8. 8.

    Synthetically modified DNAs as substrates for polymerases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4, 602–608 (2000).

  9. 9.

    & Beyond A, C, G and T: augmenting Nature's alphabet. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7, 727–733 (2003).

  10. 10.

    Unnatural base pair systems for DNA/RNA-based biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 622–627 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Replacing the nucleobases in DNA with designer molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 936–943 (2002).

  12. 12.

    , & Mimicking the structure and function of DNA: insights into DNA stability and replication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 990–1009 (2000).

  13. 13.

    & Redesigning the architecture of the base pair: toward biochemical and biological function of new genetic sets. Chem. Biol. 16, 242–248 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , & Enzymic recognition of the base pair between isocytidine and isoguanosine. Biochemistry 32, 10489–10496 (1993).

  15. 15.

    et al. Probing the interaction of archaeal DNA polymerases with deaminated bases using X-ray crystallography and non-hydrogen bonding isosteric base analogues. Biochemistry 49, 5772–5781 (2010).

  16. 16.

    , , & A unique fluorescent base analogue for the expansion of the genetic alphabet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4988–4989 (2010).

  17. 17.

    et al. Discovery, characterization, and optimization of an unnatural base pair for expansion of the genetic alphabet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2336–2343 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Toward a designed genetic system with biochemical function: polymerase synthesis of single and multiple size-expanded DNA base pairs. Org. Biomol. Chem. 8, 2704–2710 (2010).

  19. 19.

    et al. Efforts toward expansion of the genetic alphabet: structure and replication of unnatural base pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10466–10473 (2007).

  20. 20.

    , & A thymidine triphosphate shape analog lacking Watson–Crick pairing ability is replicated with high sequence selectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10506–10511 (1997).

  21. 21.

    , , & Difluorotoluene, a nonpolar isostere for thymine, codes specifically and efficiently for adenine in DNA replication. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 2056–2057 (1997).

  22. 22.

    et al. An unnatural hydrophobic base pair system: site-specific incorporation of nucleotide analogs into DNA and RNA. Nature Methods 3, 729–735 (2006).

  23. 23.

    , , & Development of an unnatural base pair for efficient PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 51, 9–10 (2007).

  24. 24.

    , , , & A third base pair for the polymerase chain reaction: inserting isoC and isoG. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1937–1941 (2004).

  25. 25.

    , , & Expanded genetic alphabets in the polymerase chain reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 177–180 (2010).

  26. 26.

    , , & Enzymic incorporation of a new base pair into DNA and RNA extends the genetic alphabet. Nature 343, 33–37 (1990).

  27. 27.

    , & Recognition of a non-standard base pair by thermostable DNA polymerases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 1149–1152 (1998).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Incorporation of thymine nucleotides by DNA polymerases through T-HgII-T base pairing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6516–6519 (2010).

  29. 29.

    The reversible reaction of sodium thymonucleate and mercuric chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 2238–2245 (1952).

  30. 30.

    & Mercury(II) site-selective binding to a DNA hairpin. Relationship of sequence-dependent intra- and interstrand cross-linking to the hairpin–duplex conformational transition. Inorg. Chem. 35, 5654–5662 (1996).

  31. 31.

    et al. MercuryII-mediated formation of thymine–HgII–thymine base pairs in DNA duplexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2172–2173 (2006).

  32. 32.

    , & ‘Illusionary’ polymerase activity triggered by metal ions: use for molecular logic-gate operations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9757–9760 (2010).

  33. 33.

    et al. Specific interactions between silver(I) ions and cytosine–cytosine pairs in DNA duplexes. Chem. Commun. 39, 4825–4827 (2008).

  34. 34.

    , , & Pyrimidine–pyrimidine base pairs stabilized by silver(I) ions. Chem. Commun. 47, 941–943 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Molecular computing: DNA as a logic operator. Nature 469, 45–46 (2011).

  36. 36.

    & Nucleic acid template-directed assembly of metallosalen–DNA conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 8618–8619 (2001).

  37. 37.

    & Template-directed assembly of metallosalen–DNA hairpin conjugates. ChemBioChem 5, 127–129 (2004).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Modular DNA-programmed assembly of linear and branched conjugated nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1044–1046 (2004).

  39. 39.

    , , , & Synthesis of linear and tripoidal oligo(phenylene ethynylene)-based building blocks for application in modular DNA-programmed assembly. J. Org. Chem. 69, 2240–2250 (2004).

  40. 40.

    , & A highly DNA-duplex-stabilizing metal-salen base pair. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 7204–7208 (2005).

  41. 41.

    & Controlled stacking of 10 transition-metal ions inside a DNA duplex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 250–253 (2007).

  42. 42.

    , , & Antiferromagnetic coupling of stacked cuII-salen complexes in DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4927–4929 (2010).

  43. 43.

    , , , & Metal–salen-base-pair complexes inside DNA: complexation overrides sequence information. Chem. Eur. J. 12, 8708–8718 (2006).

  44. 44.

    , & DNA–metal base pairs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6226–6236 (2007).

  45. 45.

    Metal-ion-mediated base pairs in nucleic acids. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 3749–3763 (2008).

  46. 46.

    & Metal–base pairing in DNA. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2391–2402 (2010).

  47. 47.

    & Privileged chiral catalysts. Science 299, 1691–1693 (2003).

  48. 48.

    , , & Structure of a copper-mediated base pair in DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 12364–12367 (2001).

  49. 49.

    , , , & Solution structure of a DNA double helix with consecutive metal-mediated base pairs. Nature Chem. 2, 229–234 (2010).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Using in vitro transcription to construct scaffolds for one-dimensional arrays of mercuric ions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 102, 1141–1151 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB749, CiPSM) and the Volkswagen Foundation (grant no. I/85052). C.K. is the recipient of a pre-doctoral fellowship from the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, D-81377 Munich, Germany

    • Corinna Kaul
    • , Markus Müller
    • , Mirko Wagner
    •  & Thomas Carell
  2. Faculty of Chemistry at the Technical University Munich, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, D-85748 Garching, Germany

    • Sabine Schneider

Authors

  1. Search for Corinna Kaul in:

  2. Search for Markus Müller in:

  3. Search for Mirko Wagner in:

  4. Search for Sabine Schneider in:

  5. Search for Thomas Carell in:

Contributions

C.K. and M.W. performed the chemical experiments. C.K. carried out the biochemical assays and crystallization experiments. M.M. solved the crystal structures and supervised the biological studies. S.S. collected crystal data. T.C. designed the study and supervised the research project. C.K., M.M. and T.C. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Carell.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1117

Further reading