The epidermis is maintained by multiple stem cell populations whose progeny differentiate along diverse, and spatially distinct, lineages. Here we show that the transcription factor Gata6 controls the identity of the previously uncharacterized sebaceous duct (SD) lineage and identify the Gata6 downstream transcription factor network that specifies a lineage switch between sebocytes and SD cells. During wound healing differentiated Gata6+ cells migrate from the SD into the interfollicular epidermis and dedifferentiate, acquiring the ability to undergo long-term self-renewal and differentiate into a much wider range of epidermal lineages than in undamaged tissue. Our data not only demonstrate that the structural and functional complexity of the junctional zone is regulated by Gata6, but also reveal that dedifferentiation is a previously unrecognized property of post-mitotic, terminally differentiated cells that have lost contact with the basement membrane. This resolves the long-standing debate about the contribution of terminally differentiated cells to epidermal wound repair.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
npj Regenerative Medicine Open Access 11 February 2022
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports Open Access 10 February 2022
BioMedical Engineering OnLine Open Access 17 February 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Tata, P. R. et al. Dedifferentiation of committed epithelial cells into stem cells in vivo. Nature 503, 218–223 (2013).
van Es, J. H. et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1099–1104 (2012).
Page, M. E., Lombard, P., Ng, F., Gottgens, B. & Jensen, K. B. The epidermis comprises autonomous compartments maintained by distinct stem cell populations. Cell Stem Cell 13, 471–482 (2013).
Donati, G. & Watt, F. M. Stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity in epithelia. Cell Stem Cell 16, 465–476 (2015).
Tetteh, P. W., Farin, H. F. & Clevers, H. Plasticity within stem cell hierarchies in mammalian epithelia. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 100–108 (2015).
Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science 344, 1242281 (2014).
Ito, M. et al. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat. Med. 11, 1351–1354 (2005).
Jensen, K. B. et al. Lrig1 expression defines a distinct multipotent stem cell population in mammalian epidermis. Cell Stem Cell 4, 427–439 (2009).
Watt, F. M. Mammalian skin cell biology: at the interface between laboratory and clinic. Science 346, 937–940 (2014).
Park, S. et al. Tissue-scale coordination of cellular behaviour promotes epidermal wound repair in live mice. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 155–163 (2017).
Aragona, M. et al. Defining stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat. Commun. 8, 14684 (2017).
Hsu, Y. C., Pasolli, H. A. & Fuchs, E. Dynamics between stem cells, niche, and progeny in the hair follicle. Cell 144, 92–105 (2011).
Niemann, C., Owens, D. M., Hulsken, J., Birchmeier, W. & Watt, F. M. Expression of ΔNLef1 in mouse epidermis results in differentiation of hair follicles into squamous epidermal cysts and formation of skin tumours. Development 129, 95–109 (2002).
Donati, G. et al. Epidermal Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates adipocyte differentiation via secretion of adipogenic factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1501–E1509 (2014).
Cheung, W. K. et al. Control of alveolar differentiation by the lineage transcription factors GATA6 and HOPX inhibits lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell 23, 725–738 (2013).
Kaufman, C. K. et al. GATA-3: an unexpected regulator of cell lineage determination in skin. Genes Dev. 17, 2108–2122 (2003).
Campbell, K., Whissell, G., Franch-Marro, X., Batlle, E. & Casanova, J. Specific GATA factors act as conserved inducers of an endodermal-EMT. Dev. Cell 21, 1051–1061 (2011).
Wang, A. B., Zhang, Y. V. & Tumbar, T. Gata6 promotes hair follicle progenitor cell renewal by genome maintenance during proliferation. EMBO J. 36, 61–78 (2016).
Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals that differentiation and spatial signatures shape epidermal and hair follicle heterogeneity. Cell Syst. 3, 221–237.e9 (2016).
Fullgrabe, A. et al. Dynamics of Lgr6+ progenitor cells in the hair follicle, sebaceous gland, and interfollicular epidermis. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 843–855 (2015).
Snippert, H. J. et al. Lgr6 marks stem cells in the hair follicle that generate all cell lineages of the skin. Science 327, 1385–1389 (2010).
Nguyen, H., Rendl, M. & Fuchs, E. Tcf3 governs stem cell features and represses cell fate determination in skin. Cell 127, 171–183 (2006).
Nowak, J. A., Polak, L., Pasolli, H. A. & Fuchs, E. Hair follicle stem cells are specified and function in early skin morphogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 3, 33–43 (2008).
Takaoka, K., Yamamoto, M. & Hamada, H. Origin and role of distal visceral endoderm, a group of cells that determines anterior-posterior polarity of the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 743–752 (2011).
Veniaminova, N. A. et al. Keratin 79 identifies a novel population of migratory epithelial cells that initiates hair canal morphogenesis and regeneration. Development 140, 4870–4880 (2013).
Kretzschmar, K. et al. BLIMP1 is required for postnatal epidermal homeostasis but does not define a sebaceous gland progenitor under steady-state conditions. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 620–633 (2014).
Sodhi, C. P., Li, J. & Duncan, S. A. Generation of mice harbouring a conditional loss-of-function allele of Gata6. BMC Dev. Biol. 6, 19 (2006).
Cottle, D. L. et al. c-MYC-induced sebaceous gland differentiation is controlled by an androgen receptor/p53 axis. Cell Rep. 3, 427–441 (2013).
Magnusdottir, E. et al. Epidermal terminal differentiation depends on B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14988–14993 (2007).
Driskell, R. R. et al. Distinct fibroblast lineages determine dermal architecture in skin development and repair. Nature 504, 277–281 (2013).
Watt, F. M. & Green, H. Involucrin synthesis is correlated with cell size in human epidermal cultures. J. Cell Biol. 90, 738–742 (1981).
Jones, P. H. & Watt, F. M. Separation of human epidermal stem cells from transit amplifying cells on the basis of differences in integrin function and expression. Cell 73, 713–724 (1993).
Gomez, C. et al. The interfollicular epidermis of adult mouse tail comprises two distinct cell lineages that are differentially regulated by Wnt, Edaradd, and Lrig1. Stem Cell Rep. 1, 19–27 (2013).
Kretzschmar, K. & Watt, F. M. Markers of epidermal stem cell subpopulations in adult mammalian skin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. 4, a013631 (2014).
Zaret, K. S. & Carroll, J. S. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes Dev. 25, 2227–2241 (2011).
Krawczyk, W. S. A pattern of epidermal cell migration during wound healing. J. Cell Biol. 49, 247–263 (1971).
Paladini, R. D., Takahashi, K., Bravo, N. S. & Coulombe, P. A. Onset of re-epithelialization after skin injury correlates with a reorganization of keratin filaments in wound edge keratinocytes: defining a potential role for keratin 16. J. Cell Biol. 132, 381–397 (1996).
Radice, G. P. The spreading of epithelial cells during wound closure in Xenopus larvae. Dev. Biol. 76, 26–46 (1980).
Woodley, D. T. et al. in Reepithelialization. The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair 2nd edn (ed. Clark, R. A. F.) 339–354 (Plenum, 1996).
Safferling, K. et al. Wound healing revised: a novel reepithelialization mechanism revealed by in vitro and in silico models. J. Cell Biol. 203, 691–709 (2013).
Collins, C. A. & Watt, F. M. Dynamic regulation of retinoic acid-binding proteins in developing, adult and neoplastic skin reveals roles for beta-catenin and Notch signalling. Dev. Biol. 324, 55–67 (2008).
Ramirez, A. et al. A keratin K5Cre transgenic line appropriate for tissue-specific or generalized Cre-mediated recombination. Genesis 39, 52–57 (2004).
Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).
Ohinata, Y. et al. Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 436, 207–213 (2005).
Okabe, M., Ikawa, M., Kominami, K., Nakanishi, T. & Nishimune, Y. ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett. 407, 313–319 (1997).
Kawamoto, S. et al. A novel reporter mouse strain that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated recombination. FEBS Lett. 470, 263–268 (2000).
Kretzschmar, K., Weber, C., Driskell, R., Calonje, E. & Watt, F. M. Compartmentalised epidermal activation of β-catenin differentially affects lineage reprogramming and underlies tumour heterogeneity. Cell Rep. 14, 269–281 (2016).
Hoste, E. et al. Innate sensing of microbial products promotes wound-induced skin cancer. Nat. Commun. 6, 5932 (2015).
Fujiwara, H. et al. The basement membrane of hair follicle stem cells is a muscle cell niche. Cell 144, 577–589 (2011).
Sada, A. et al. Defining the cellular lineage hierarchy in the interfollicular epidermis of adult skin. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 619–631 (2016).
Hiratsuka, T. et al. Intercellular propagation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation revealed by in vivo imaging of mouse skin. eLife 4, e05178 (2015).
Watt, F. M., Jordan, P. W. & O’Neill, C. H. Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5576–5580 (1988).
Mulder, K. W. et al. Diverse epigenetic strategies interact to control epidermal differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 753–763 (2012).
Schmidt, D. et al. ChIP-seq: using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein-DNA interactions. Methods 48, 240–248 (2009).
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
Buczacki, S. J. et al. Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5. Nature 495, 65–69 (2013).
Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Zambelli, F., Pesole, G. & Pavesi, G. Pscan: finding over-represented transcription factor binding site motifs in sequences from co-regulated or co-expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W247–W252 (2009).
Wilson, D., Charoensawan, V., Kummerfeld, S. K. & Teichmann, S. A. DBD–taxonomically broad transcription factor predictions: new content and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D88–D92 (2008).
Fulton, D. L. et al. TFCat: the curated catalog of mouse and human transcription factors. Genome Biol. 10, R29 (2009).
Zhang, H. M. et al. AnimalTFDB: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D144–D149 (2012).
Bailey, T. L. et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202–W208 (2009).
Franceschini, A. et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D808–D815 (2013).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
We thank H. Fujiwara, S. Woodhouse, B. M. Lichtenberger, A. Mishra, V. Proserpio, M. Cereda and all the members of the Watt laboratory for helpful discussions and for excellent suggestions; X. Zou (CR-UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, UK) and the Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell MRC for assistance in generating the Gata6 KI mouse model; D. Cottle and C. Collins for access to animal samples; the core facilities of CRI and KCL and the NIHR GSTT/KCL Biomedical Research Centre for superb technical assistance; the Paterson Institute Microarray Facility for performing arrays; H. Hamada (Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) for kindly sharing the Gata6 reporter mouse; B. Rosen and F. Amaral (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK) for the eGFPCreERT2 cassette. This work was funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the European Union FP7 programme. K.K. was the recipient of an MRC UK PhD studentship; T.H. is the recipient of a EU Marie Curie Fellowship; E.R. is the recipient of an EMBO long-term fellowship (ALTF594-2014).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Integrated supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 1 K14ΔNLef1 phenotypes, Gata6 expression in wild type adult skin. Gata6-tdTomato reporter analysis and Gata6 ChIP-Seq.
(a) Late K14ΔNLef1 phenotypes: ectopic sebaceous glands (SG) (middle panel) and cysts (right panel). Haematoxylin and Eosin stained dorsal skin sections from wild type (WT) and K14ΔNLef1 mice at 22 weeks. (b) Heatmap of genes that are differentially expressed between WT and K14ΔNLef1 epidermal cells. (c) RT-qPCR of RNA from microdissected WT and K14ΔNLef1 hair follicles (HF) compared to heart (positive control for Gata4 and Gata6 expression). Data are means ± s.d. from n = 3 independent biological samples. (d) Tamoxifen treated (lower panel) and untreated (top panel) Lgr6EGFPCreERT2 Rosa26-fl/STOP/fl-tdTomato back skin sections stained with antibodies to Gata6. Representative images of 2 independent experiments. (e) Adult WT dorsal skin sections (bottom panels) or tail epidermal whole mounts (top panels) were stained for Gata6 and markers for different hair follicle stem cell populations. Insets are higher magnification views of boxed areas. Representative images of 3 independent experiments. (f) Adult ear skin sections from Gata6 reporter mouse showing co-localization of endogenous Gata6 and tdTomato. Representative images of 4 mice. (g,h) Gata6-tdTomato adult ear (g) and tail (h) epidermal whole mounts showing endogenous tdTomato and Krt14 antibody labelling. White arrows indicate the absence of Gata6 expression in lower growing HF during anagen. Yellow brackets indicate the bulge areas. Representative images of 4 mice. (i) A Z stack image (left panel) of a HF from whole mount tail Gata6-tdTomato epidermis stained with anti-Krt14. Orthogonal images from the 3D reconstruction (right panels), at the plane indicated by the white lines, show basal cell Gata6 expression confined to the junctional zone in proximity to the sebaceous glands (upper right panel). Flow cytometry analysis of Gata6-tdTomato dorsal epidermis shows absence of Gata6 + CD34 + cells in adult telogen HF (right panel). Representative image/plot of n = 3 mice j, Gata6 and Gapdh western blot of control (empty vector) and Gata6-overexpressing cultured primary mouse keratinocytes. Unprocessed scan of the blot are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. (k) Average signal intensity of Gata6 binding sites detected by two Gata6 antibodies (blue and light blue). (l) Representative plots of ChIP-Seq reads aligned to the Lpl and Cldn4 gene loci. (m) Motif enrichment analysis on Gata6 target regions performed by Meme Suite identified Gata6 expected DNA consensus and putative co-regulators. Scale bars, 50 μm (a,d–f,i); 150 μm (g,h).
Supplementary Figure 2 Structural complexity of the junctional zone (JZ) revealed by gene expression profiling and antibody labelling.
(a) Expression profile analysis (RT–qPCR) of sorted basal JZ cells (green), non-basal SD cells (violet), bulge cells (yellow) and all remaining basal cells (grey) from telogen mouse back skin. Data are means ± s.d. from n = 3 mice for Lgr6, Gata6, tdTomato, Cd34 and Tnc; n = 7 mice for Plet1 and Lrig1; n = 5 mice for Blimp1. (b,c) Gata6 and Blimp1 co-localize in the outermost differentiated layers of the JZ/SD. Wild type tail epidermal section stained for Gata6 and Blimp1 (b, top panels). Masks after color threshold analysis with ImageJ software and single fluorescent channel images of the magnified white insert are shown (b, bottom panels). Quantification of Gata6 expression in Blimp1 positive cells in JZ/SD and IFE (c). n = 35 images from 4 mice. Data are means ± s.e.m. (d–j) Wild type back (d,f,g) or tail (e,h,i,j) skin sections stained with the indicated antibodies. Representative images of 3 mice Dashed lines demarcate epidermal-dermal boundaries. Scale bars, 50 μm.
(a) RT-qPCR of mRNA from dorsal epidermis of wild type (WT) and Gata6 knockout (cKO) mice confirming loss of Gata6 expression in the Gata6 cKO. Data are means ± s.d. from n = 4 mice. (b) Quantification of basal Itga6 + Cd34- keratinocytes by flow cytometry (see Fig. 1h). Data are means ± s.d. from n = 3 mice. c, Tail skin sections from WT, Gata6 epidermal knockout (cKO), K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 x Gata6 cKO (K14ΔNLef1 cKO) stained for the duct marker Plet1. Inserts are higher magnification views. (d,e) K14ΔNLEF1 cysts express Plet1 and Atp6v1c2 and expression is reduced in the absence of Gata6. RT–qPCR analysis of mRNA from WT, cKO, K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 cKO epidermis (d). K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 cKO back skin sections were stained for the SD marker Atp6v1c2 and the SG marker Scd1 (e). Data are means ± s.d. from n = 4 WT, n = 5 cKO, n = 3 K14ΔNLef1 and n = 4 K14ΔNLef1 cKO mice. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.005, by unpaired Student’s t-test. Scale bars, 50 μm. (f) Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of Gata6 direct target genes highly expressed in Gata6 + Itga6 + cells (see Fig. 2a). g, Plots of ChIP-Seq reads aligned to the Cep55, Ncaph and Spc24 (representative genes involved in mitosis) loci are shown. h, RT–qPCR of RNA from wild type (WT), Gata6 knockout (cKO), K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 x Gata6 cKO (K14ΔNLef1 cKO) epidermal cells. (i–k) Validation of gene expression profiles from manual microdissected tail interfollicular epidermis (IFE), hair follicles (HF) and sebaceous glands (SG). Bright field image of tail epidermal whole mount showing schematic of microdissection strategy (i). Z score heat maps representing array results for differentially expressed genes (j) validated by RT-qPCR (k). Data are means ± s.d. from n = 4 mice for IFE; n = 6 mice for SG; n = 2 for HF; n = 6 for whole tail epidermis (EPID). l, Sections of wild type (WT), Gata6 epidermal knockout (cKO), K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 x Gata6 cKO (K14ΔNLef1 cKO) dorsal skin stained for Gata6 and Blimp1 showing reduction in Blimp1 + cells in HF but not IFE in absence of Gata6. Inserts are higher magnification views of the JZ (red channel only). Asterisk indicates nonspecific staining. Dashed lines indicate epidermal-dermal boundary. (m) Nuclear Androgen Receptor, Ar (black arrows), normally present in WT SG (insert panel), is reduced in K14ΔNLef1 ectopic SG (top panel) but restored in K14ΔNLef1 epidermis when Gata6 is ablated (bottom panel). Back skin sections were labeled with Ar antibody. o, RT–qPCR analysis of RNA from WT, cKO, K14ΔNLef1 and K14ΔNLef1 cKO adult back skin dermis. Data are means ± s.d. from n = 4 WT, n = 5 cKO, n = 3 K14ΔNLef1 and n = 4 K14ΔNLef1 cKO mice ∗P < 0.05 by unpaired Student’s t-test. (p) Schematic representation of Gata6 regulation of Ar and Blimp1. Representative images of n = 3 mice per genotype. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Supplementary Figure 4 Gata6 genetic labeling of epidermis under homeostatic conditions and Gata6 regulation by Vitamin A and Myc.
(a) Untreated (top left panel) and tamoxifen (4OHT) treated adult back skin sections from Gata6EGFPCreERT2 x Rosa26-fl/STOP/fl-tdTomato reporter mice. Dotted white lines indicate sebaceous glands. Samples were collected at the time points indicated. Gata6 genetically labeled cells are restricted to the junctional zone and sebaceous ducts (white arrow) and are not present in the lower HF. Representative images of 2 independent experiments. (b) Schematic of known upstream regulators of Gata6 expression in multiple cell contexts11,12. (c) The transcription factor Myc induces Gata6 expression in the junctional zone, in the sebaceous glands and in the interfollicular epidermis (white arrows); in contrast, in K14ΔNLef1 skin, Gata6 expression is only induced in the epidermal cysts (see Fig. 1c). Sections of tamoxifen treated dorsal skin from wild type (WT) and K14MycER mice10 stained for Gata6 (red) and Krt14 (green). Representative images of 3 mice. (d,e) Quantification of Gata6 expressing cells per hair follicle (d) and per length of interfollicular epidermis (IFE) (e) in the indicated mouse strains. Box-and-whisker plots: mid-line, median; box, 25th to 75th percentiles; and whiskers, minimum and maximum (n = 12 hair follicles). (f,g) Gata6 expression in the interfollicular epidermis correlates with the presence of ectopic SG (white and black arrowheads) in Tamoxifen treated skin from K14MycER mice. Dorsal skin sections were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (f) or Gata6 and Scd1 (g). Representative images of n = 3 mice. (h,i) Treatment with Vitamin A (Retinoid Acid – RA) leads to the presence of Gata6 expressing suprabasal cells in the interfollicular epidermis and lower hair follicle (white arrows) of adult dorsal skin, where normally Gata6 is not expressed. Acetone- (vehicle) and RA-treated skin sections were stained for Gata6, Ki67, and Fabp5. Insert with white lines is magnified in right panel h. Representative images of 3 mice. Dashed lines demarcate epidermal-dermal boundaries. Scale bars, 25 μm (a), 50 μm (c,f–i).
Supplementary Figure 5 Characterization and quantification of Lrig1 and Gata6 genetically labelled (GL) cells prior to wounding and during re-epithelialization.
(a) Quantification of Gata6 and Lrig1 genetically labeled (GL) cells after tamoxifen treatment, 48 h after wounding in tail skin (n = 5 mice, 116 HF for Gata6; 27 HF for Lrig1). Data are means ± s.d. (b) Flow cytometry analysis showing lack of EdU incorporation by GL Gata6 tail keratinocytes in unwounded skin. Representative flow cytometry plots of epidermal Lrig1 (dark grey) and Gata6 (red) GL cells from back and tail skin (top left panels). Gates in upper panels mark EdU positive cells analyzed in bottom left density plots (dashed green lines demarcate tdTomato negative controls). Quantification of EdU incorporation in all epidermal cells (top right panels) and tdTomato Gata6 (red) or Lrig1 (dark grey) GL cells (bottom right panels) is shown. (n = 6 mice for Gata6; n = 3 mice for Lrig1). Data are means ± s.d. (c) Histological analysis confirming the absence of EdU incorporation into GL Gata6 in unwounded tail skin. Tail skin sections showing tdTomato GL Gata6 (left) or Lrig1 cells (right)) and EdU localization. EdU masks after color threshold analysis with ImageJ software together with tdTomato mask (top panel) or single tdTomato channel (bottom panel) are shown. Representative images of 2 independent experiments. Quantification of EdU incorporation by GL (Lrgi1 or Gata6) cells in JZ/SD (n = 3 mice each; 49HF) is shown. Scale bars, 50 μm (d) Suprabasal Gata6 GL cells acquire a basement membrane position during wound re-epithelialisation. Position in the epidermal layers of Gata6 GL cells at the indicated day after wounding tail skin is shown. Measurements are position relative to the basement membrane of the lowest Gata6 GL cell of a column of labelled cells in the wound bed (“0” corresponds to the basal cell layer). From n = 3 mice for day 5, 9, 12 and n = 4 mice for day 7 (average of 70 columnar cell units per mouse). The yellow bars in the violin plots represent median and black lines the 25th and 75th percentiles. (e) Quantification of flow cytometry analysis of High-Itga6 and Mid/Low-Itga6 expressing Gata6 and Lrig1 GL cells in the tail wound bed at the indicated days after wounding. Data are means ± s.d. from n = 4 mice for Gata6 GL 5d, 12d and Lrig1 GL 5d; n = 3 for Lrig1 GL 12d. Representative flow cytometric plots (right panels) are shown. Light blue lines represent gating strategy used for quantification in left hand panel13. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.005, by unpaired Student’s t-test. (f) Quantification of Ki67 + Lrig1 and Gata6 tdTomato GL cells at day 6 after wounding. Data are means ± s.e.m. from n = 25 cell clusters.
(a) Blimp1-eGfp reporter mouse shows Blimp1 promoter activity in differentiated epidermal layers in undamaged epidermis and in the wound bed. Section of re-epithelialised wound from Blimp1-eGfp mouse stained for Gfp (green) and Itga6 (red). White arrow indicates newly formed dermal condensate in the magnified insert (Gfp channel only). Representative images of n = 3 mice. (b,c) Sections of back skin showing Blimp1 genetically labelled cells (green) in Blimp1Cre cag-cat-eGfp mice stained for Itga6 (red) in homeostatic (b) and hyperproliferative (c) skin. Hyperproliferation was induced by irradiation with 1,000 J m−2 UVB. White arrows indicate eGfp labelled Blimp1 expressing cells in the differentiated epidermal layers. Representative images of 3 mice. (d) Section of re-epithelialized wounded back skin stained with antibodies to Blimp1 and Krt14. Blimp1 expression is restricted to terminally differentiated epidermal cells in undamaged epidermis and in the wound bed. Inserts with white lines are higher magnification views. Representative images of 3 mice. (e) Differentiated, Blimp1 positive, epidermal cells dedifferentiate during re-epithelialization. Section of back skin showing Blimp1 lineage cells (red) stained with Itga6. White arrows (left hand insert) indicate tdTomato expressing Blimp1 GL cells in the differentiated epidermal layers far from the wound area. In the middle insert tdTomato labeled Blimp1 cells in the dermal papilla are shown. Right insert shows wound edge. The yellow boxed area is further magnified in the right hand panels. Single fluorescent channel images (left to right: dapi, Itga6, tdTomato) of two Gata6 GL cells indicated by the yellow arrows are shown. Representative images of 2 independent experiments. (f–h) Sections of tail (f,g) or back skin (h) at the indicated time points after wounding showing columns of IFE cells derived from dedifferentiation of Blimp1 GL cells (tdTomato). Sections are stained with Krt14 or Itga6. Nuclear expression of Blimp1 (red) is restricted to the suprabasal layers in the wound bed (g, lower panel). Representative images of n = 2 independent experiments. Inserts with white lines are higher magnification views. Dashed lines indicate dermal-epidermal junction. Scale bars, 50 μm (a–f); 25 μm (g,h).
Supplementary Figure 7 Additional evidence for the plasticity of differentiated Gata6 + cells following skin reconstitution.
Epidermal cells isolated from the back skin of Gata6-tdTomato reporter/GFP-expressing adult mice in telogen were sorted into differentiated Gata6 Itga6 low/tdTomato positive and Itga6 high cells. These two populations were compared in a skin reconstitution assay (Fig. 6). (a,b). Graft skin sections stained for Gfp (green) and Krt14 (red). Single fluorescent channel images (a) and magnification of boxed inserts (b, left panels) are shown. Yellow arrows indicate Gfp positive basal cells derived from Gata6 + Itga6 low cells in the sebaceous gland (a). Dashed lines demarcate epidermal-dermal boundaries. Representative images from 3 to 6 chamber graft assays (Itga6 high and Itga6 low/tdTomato positive cells respectively). Scale bars, 25 μm.
Supplementary Figure 8 Time lapse imaging of migration of suprabasal Gata6 GL cells during wound healing in adult ear skin.
(a) A single stack image at 0 h indicating the wound edge (magenta dotted line), HFs (white dotted circles), nuclei and collagen (green) and Gata6 genetically labeled (GL) cells (red). The thickness used to reconstruct the orthogonal images to be able to follow the entire group of Gata6 GL cells over time shown in Fig. 7a is indicated by the yellow rectangle. Representative image of 6 independent experiments. Scale bars, 100 μm. (b) Quantification of the speed of cell migration according to whether cells moved upward, downward or straight. (c,d) Representative examples of upward (c) and straight (d) and migration of Gata6 GL cells (white arrows) are shown. Orthogonal images at the indicated time points from the beginning of image acquisition showing tdTomato labeled cells (red), nuclei and collagen (green). White lines indicate the basal membrane. Cartoons summarising the cell movements are shown in the top left panels. Scale bars, 25 μm. (e,f) Cell shape and size analysis of Gata6 GL cells during wound healing. Snapshots from live imaging during wound healing (Fig. 7) were analyzed to assess size and shape of Gata6 GL cells that attached to the basement membrane compared to Gata6 GL cells that maintained a suprabasal position and unlabelled keratinocytes. Heat-mapped XY -view of the shapes of suprabasal Gata6 GL cells (left panel, n = 18 cells) and Gata6 GL cells that attached to the basement membrane (BM) (right panel, n = 9 cells) (e). Individual cells were aligned to the same XY centroid position and rotated to align wound direction horizontally to the right. Note that newly BM-attached GL cells were elongated toward the axis of wound direction as quantified in (f) (Right panel). Quantification of Gata6 GL cell size with reference to control keratinocytes in mouse ear skin (f). The reference cell size was obtained by in vivo labelling of keratinocytes by injection of Isolectin into WT mouse ear skin. Note that Gata6 GL cell that newly attached to the basement membrane had a similar size to normal basal keratinocytes (left panel). Quantification of cell elongation toward the axis of wound direction through the quantification of the migration shape index (MSI), defined as the ratio (α/β) of cell length projected to the axis of wound direction (α) over cell length perpendicular to the axis (β). Blue dotted line indicates MSI = 1, no elongation (right panel). Data are means ± s.d. from n = 21 Basal cells (reference); n = 20 Suprabasal cells (reference); n = 18 Suprabasal Gata6 GL cells; n = 9 newly BM-attached Gata6 GL cells. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.005 by unpaired Student’s t-test.
Supplementary Information (PDF 33269 kb)
Supplementary Information (XLSX 47 kb)
Supplementary Information (XLSX 84 kb)
Supplementary Information (XLSX 88 kb)
3D representtation of Gata6 positive cells in the JZ/SD visualised with the Gata6-tdTomato reporter. Confocal Z stack projections of tail epidermal whole mount rendered using Volocity software. (MOV 2226 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Donati, G., Rognoni, E., Hiratsuka, T. et al. Wounding induces dedifferentiation of epidermal Gata6+ cells and acquisition of stem cell properties. Nat Cell Biol 19, 603–613 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3532
This article is cited by
npj Regenerative Medicine (2022)
Low-level laser treatment promotes skin wound healing by activating hair follicle stem cells in female mice
Lasers in Medical Science (2022)
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports (2022)
BioMedical Engineering OnLine (2021)
Nature Cell Biology (2021)