Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Kinetochore–microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes

Nature Cell Biology volume 17, pages 421–433 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 March 2015

This article has been updated

Abstract

For proper chromosome segregation, sister kinetochores must interact with microtubules from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). To establish bi-orientation, aberrant kinetochore–microtubule attachments are disrupted (error correction) by aurora B kinase (Ipl1 in budding yeast). Paradoxically, during this disruption, new attachments are still formed efficiently to enable fresh attempts at bi-orientation. How this is possible remains an enigma. Here we show that kinetochore attachment to the microtubule lattice (lateral attachment) is impervious to aurora B regulation, but attachment to the microtubule plus end (end-on attachment) is disrupted by this kinase. Thus, a new lateral attachment is formed without interference, then converted to end-on attachment and released if incorrect. This process continues until bi-orientation is established and stabilized by tension across sister kinetochores. We reveal how aurora B specifically promotes disruption of the end-on attachment through phospho-regulation of kinetochore components Dam1 and Ndc80. Our results reveal fundamental mechanisms for promoting error correction for bi-orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The KT–MT attachments are turned over repeatedly when the Dam1 C-terminus and Ndc80 N-tail are deleted.
Figure 2: The KT attaches normally to the MT lateral surface but detaches afterwards, when the Dam1 C-terminus and the Ndc80 N-tail are deleted.
Figure 3: The KT often detaches from the MT end when the Dam1 C-terminus and the Ndc80 N-tail are deleted.
Figure 4: The Dam1 C-terminus helps Stu2 to rescue an MT.
Figure 5: Aurora B phospho-mimicking Dam1 and Ndc80 mutants show repeated turnover of KT–MT attachments.
Figure 6: Aurora B phospho-mimicking Dam1 and Ndc80 mutants show normal lateral KT–MT attachment, but subsequent detachment from the MT end.
Figure 7: Aurora B facilitates detachment of an unreplicated MC from the MT end without changing the kinetics of its lateral MT attachment.
Figure 8: Non-phosphorylatable Dam1 and Ndc80 mutants at aurora B sites reduce the detachment rate of a KT from the MT plus end.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 11 March 2015

    In the version of this Article originally published online, the lines connecting the data points were missing from the chart on the left of Fig. 8c. This has been corrected in all versions of the Article.

References

  1. Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards bi-orientation. EMBO J. 29, 4070–4082 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rieder, C. L. & Alexander, S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 81–95 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka, K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987–994 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka, K., Kitamura, E., Kitamura, Y. & Tanaka, T. U. Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 178, 269–281 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317–329 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hauf, S. et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161, 281–294 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lampson, M. A., Renduchitala, K., Khodjakov, A. & Kapoor, T. M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 232–237 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Westermann, S., Drubin, D. G. & Barnes, G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 563–591 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka, T. U. & Desai, A. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 53–63 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nogales, E. & Ramey, V. H. Structure-function insights into the yeast Dam1 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3831–3836 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Biggins, S. The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore. Genetics 194, 817–846 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lampert, F., Hornung, P. & Westermann, S. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189, 641–649 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tien, J. F. et al. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189, 713–723 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Maure, J. F. et al. The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21, 207–213 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lampert, F., Mieck, C., Alushin, G. M., Nogales, E. & Westermann, S. Molecular requirements for the formation of a kinetochore-microtubule interface by Dam1 and Ndc80 complexes. J. Cell Biol. 200, 21–30 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Miranda, J. J., De Wulf, P., Sorger, P. K. & Harrison, S. C. The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 138–143 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Westermann, S. et al. Formation of a dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. Mol. Cell 17, 277–290 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheeseman, I. M. et al. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163–172 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akiyoshi, B., Nelson, C. R., Ranish, J. A. & Biggins, S. Analysis of Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of the Ndc80 kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183, 1591–1595 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lampson, M. A. & Cheeseman, I. M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 133–140 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramey, V. H. et al. Subunit organization in the Dam1 kinetochore complex and its ring around microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4335–4342 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei, R. R., Al-Bassam, J. & Harrison, S. C. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 54–59 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ciferri, C. et al. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427–439 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. DeLuca, J. G. et al. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127, 969–982 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Demirel, P. B., Keyes, B. E., Chaterjee, M., Remington, C. E. & Burke, D. J. A redundant function for the N-terminal tail of Ndc80 in kinetochore-microtubule interaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 753–756 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheeseman, I. M., Chappie, J. S., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. & Desai, A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983–997 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller, S. A., Johnson, M. L. & Stukenberg, P. T. Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr. Biol. 18, 1785–1791 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarangapani, K. K., Akiyoshi, B., Duggan, N. M., Biggins, S. & Asbury, C. L. Phosphoregulation promotes release of kinetochores from dynamic microtubules via multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7282–7287 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill, A. & Bloom, K. Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2397–2405 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gandhi, S. R. et al. Kinetochore-dependent microtubule rescue ensures their efficient and sustained interaction in early mitosis. Dev. Cell 21, 920–933 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Howard, J. & Hyman, A. A. Growth, fluctuation and switching at microtubule plus ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 569–574 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Keating, P., Rachidi, N., Tanaka, T. U. & Stark, M. J. Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4375–4382 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Maure, J. F., Kitamura, E. & Tanaka, T. U. Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr. Biol. 17, 2175–2182 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jelluma, N. et al. Mps1 phophorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell 132, 233–246 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shimogawa, M. M. et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 16, 1489–1501 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Westermann, S. et al. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440, 565–569 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, T., Oliveira, R. A., Schmierer, B. & Novak, B. Dynamical scenarios for chromosome bi-orientation. Biophys. J. 104, 2595–2606 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Guimaraes, G. J., Dong, Y., McEwen, B. F. & Deluca, J. G. Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 18, 1778–1784 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Welburn, J. P. et al. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38, 383–392 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kemmler, S. et al. Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. EMBO J. 28, 1099–1110 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Welburn, J. P. et al. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16, 374–385 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gaitanos, T. N. et al. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442–1452 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Chan, Y. W., Jeyaprakash, A. A., Nigg, E. A. & Santamaria, A. Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196, 563–571 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanisch, A., Sillje, H. H. & Nigg, E. A. Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J. 25, 5504–5515 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Cheerambathur, D. K., Gassmann, R., Cook, B., Oegema, K. & Desai, A. Crosstalk between microtubule attachment complexes ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Science 342, 1239–1242 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Amberg, D. C., Burke, D. J. & Strathern, J. N. Methods in Yeast Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tanaka, T., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 492–499 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35–45 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bressan, D. A., Vazquez, J. & Haber, J. E. Mating type-dependent constraints on the mobility of the left arm of yeast chromosome III. J. Cell Biol. 164, 361–371 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Uhlmann, F., Wernic, D., Poupart, M. A., Koonin, E. V. & Nasmyth, K. Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell 103, 375–386 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Straight, A. F., Marshall, W. F., Sedat, J. W. & Murray, A. W. Mitosis in living budding yeast: anaphase A but no metaphase plate. Science 277, 574–578 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dohmen, R. J., Wu, P. & Varshavsky, A. Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants. Science 263, 1273–1276 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nishimura, K., Fukagawa, T., Takisawa, H., Kakimoto, T. & Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Methods 6, 917–922 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Haruki, H., Nishikawa, J. & Laemmli, U. K. The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol. Cell 31, 925–932 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Biggins, S. et al. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 532–544 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tanaka, K., Kitamura, E. & Tanaka, T. U. Live-cell analysis of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in budding yeast. Methods 51, 206–213 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kitamura, E. et al. Kinetochores generate microtubules with distal plus ends: their roles and limited lifetime in mitosis. Dev. Cell 18, 248–259 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Gierlinski and the Tanaka and Novak groups for discussion, E. Griffis and L. Clayton for reading the manuscript and A. Musacchio for advising on ndc80-CH-K6A mutations. We thank J-F. Maure for constructing the T7427 strain and dam1C-4D mutant, N. Kobayashi for making and testing the ipl1-321–aid mutant, R. Ciosk, J. E. Haber, M. Kanemaki, U. K. Laemmli, K. Nasmyth, K. E. Sawin, R. Y. Tsien, F. Uhlmann, EUROSCARF and the Yeast Resource Centre for reagents and S. Swift and A. F.M. Ibrahim for technical help. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (096535, 083524, 097945), the Medical Research Council (84678), EC FP7 MitoSys (241548), an ERC advanced grant (322682), Cancer Research UK (A6996) and the Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0035-2009). M.K. received a BBSRC studentship. T.U.T. is a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maria Kalantzaki & Akihisa Mino

    Present address: Present addresses: MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK (M.K.); Boston Children’s Hospital, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA (A.M.).,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street Dundee DD1 5EH, UK,

    Maria Kalantzaki, Etsushi Kitamura, Akihisa Mino & Tomoyuki U. Tanaka

  2. Department of Biochemistry, Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QU, UK,

    Tongli Zhang & Béla Novák

Authors
  1. Maria Kalantzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Etsushi Kitamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tongli Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akihisa Mino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Béla Novák
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomoyuki U. Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.K., E.K. and T.U.T. designed experiments and interpreted results. M.K. and E.K. carried out experiments and analysed data. T.U.T., M.K., E.K., T.Z. and B.N. wrote the manuscript. A.M. gave technical support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki U. Tanaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 3 KTs show detachment from the spindle, followed by recapture, when Dam1 C-terminus and Ndc80 N-tail are deleted.

NDC80+DAM1+ (T9659), ndc80ΔN (T9298), dam1-TEVsites (T9258), ndc80ΔN dam1-TEVsites (T11454) cells with PGAL-TEV (except for T9298) MTW1-4×mCherry Venus-TUB1 PMET3-CDC20 were treated as in Fig. 1e, except that images were acquired every 30 s. A representative cell with Ndc80ΔN plus Dam1ΔCclv (0 min: start of image acquisition) is shown here. The graphs show percentages of cells that showed KT detachment from the spindle (usually followed by reattachment); n = 33, 38, 34 and 35 cells were analysed (from left to right). Experiments were performed twice (statistics source data are shown in Supplementary Table 2) and a representative experiment is shown here. p-values (two tailed) were obtained by Fisher’s exact test.

Supplementary Figure 4 Mutations at the Ndc80 calponin-homology domain lead to a defect in the lateral KT–MT attachment.

PCUP1-ubi-DHFR-ndc80 (ndc80-td) PGAL-CEN3-tetOs TetR-GFP YFP-TUB1 PMET3-CDC20 cells with NDC80+ (T10069), ndc80-CH-K6A (T7427) [expressed from NDC80 promoter] or no additional NDC80 construct (T7428), inserted at his3 locus, were treated with α-factor at 25 °C in methionine-dropout medium with raffinose, galactose and 2% CuSO4. After 3 h, cells were released to YPA medium with raffinose, galactose (to inactivate PGAL–CEN3) and methionine (to deplete Cdc20) at 35 °C (to degrade Ndc80-td). After 20 min, cells were transferred to synthetic complete medium with glucose (to re-activate PGAL-CEN3) and methionine, and images were acquired every 5 min (start of image acquisition; 0 min) at 35 °C. In the ndc80-CH-K6A mutant, six lysines were replaced with alanines within the calponin-homology domain. Representative images of T10069 and T7427 cells at 20 min (left) and the percentage of cells (n = 20–30 cells were analyse at each time point) with CEN3 that is unattached to MTs (right). The above result and Fig. 2 suggest the Ndc80 calponin-homology domain, but not the Dam1 C-terminus or the Ndc80 N-tail, is required for the initial lateral KT–MT attachment. Note that the KT on CEN3 before being caught on the lateral surface of a spindle MT (a MT extending from a spindle pole) often generates short MTs that are thought to facilitate a subsequent KT encounter with a spindle MT (ref. 57); such short KT-derived MTs were found similarly in the wild-type control, Dam1ΔCclv, Ndc80ΔN and double deletion (our unpublished result). Once CEN3is loaded on the lattice of a spindle MT, CEN3 showed sliding along this MT towards a spindle pole3; this sliding was also found similarly in wild-type control and the deletion mutants (our unpublished result).

Supplementary Figure 5 Dam1 and Stu2 interact physically in a two-hybrid assay and this interaction is abolished with Dam1ΔC and with Dam1C-4D[AurB].

(a) Stu2 protein and its C-terminus and N-terminus deletions are shown in the diagram. These deletions were used in b and c. (b,c) b shows that Dam1 and Stu2 interact physically in a two-hybrid assay and this interaction requires the Dam1 C-terminus. c shows that Dam1–Stu2 interaction in a two-hybrid assay is abolished with Dam1C-4D[AurB], that is, with phospho-mimicking mutations of the Dam1 C-terminus at Aurora B sites. Duo1 is a component of the Dam1 complex and serves as a control. Ras and Raf were also used as controls. AD and BD were as in Fig. 3g. (d) Phospho-mimicking mutants of the Dam1 C-terminus at Aurora B sites are defective in assisting Stu2 in rescuing a MT. Graph shows percentage of Stu2 transport events along a MT, leading or not leading, to MT rescue, as in Fig. 4b. DAM1+ (T11596) and dam1C-4D[AurB] dam1-aid(T11595) cells with TIR PGAL-CEN3-tetOs TetR-3xCFP STU2-4×mCherry GFP-TUB1 PMET3-CDC20 were treated as in Fig. 6a–g. n = 13 Stu2 transport events were analysed in each of T11595 and T11596. p-values (two tailed) were obtained by Fisher’s exact test. Data represent one out of two independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 6 Phospho-mimicking mutants of the Dam1 C-terminus at Mps1 sites do not show KT detachment from the spindle.

We tested whether phospho-mimicking Dam1 mutants at Mps1 sites (dam1C-4D[Mps1]; T217, S218, S221 and S232 replaced with aspartates) show phenotypes similar to those of dam1C-4D[AurB]. dam1C-4D[Mps1](T11680) and dam1C-8D[AurB+Mps1] (T11642) cells with dam1-aid TIR PGAL-CEN3-tetOs TetR-3×CFP GFP-TUB1 PMET3-CDC20were treated and analysed as in Fig. 5c, d. The results of T9530 and T11326 in Fig. 5c, d are shown again for comparison. n = 65 and 59 cells were analysed for T11680 and T11642, respectively. Experiments were performed twice (statistics source data are shown in Supplementary Table 2) and a representative experiment is shown here. p-values (two tailed) were obtained by Fisher’s exact test. In contrast to dam1C-4D[AurB], dam1C-4D[Mps1] did not significantly increase the level of bi-orientation defects or CEN3 detachment from the spindle. Furthermore, the combination of phospho-mimicking mutations at both Aurora B and Mps1 sites (dam1C-8D[AurB+Mps1]) did not exacerbate the defects found in dam1C-4D[AurB]. Thus Mps1 phosphorylation of the Dam1 C-terminus may not suppress the function of this domain and may not contribute to error correction. Consistently, non-phosphorylatable mutants of Dam1 at these Mps1 sites did not show a defect in bi-orientation35 (our unpublished result).

Supplementary Figure 7 Non-phosphorylatable mutants of the Ndc80 N-tail and Dam1 C-terminus at Aurora B sites show normal lateral KT–MT interaction and slower bi-orientation establishment.

Cells in Fig. 8b were treated as in Fig. 6a–g; that is, CEN3 under the GAL promoter was inactivated on release from α factor treatment and then reactivated during metaphase arrest. Percentage of cells at each step of KT–MT interaction is shown (as in Fig. 2c–f). Note that, in these cells, we did not observe any CEN3 detachment from a MT or from the spindle after CEN3 was caught on the MT or on the spindle. n = 21 cells were analysed in each strain. Data represent one out of two independent experiments.

Supplementary Figure 8 Full scans of western blots (for Figs 1c and 5a).

Positions of protein size markers are shown at left of each blot.

Supplementary Table 1 Genotypes of yeast strains used in this study.
Full size table
Supplementary Table 2 Statistics source data.
Full size table

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1035 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalantzaki, M., Kitamura, E., Zhang, T. et al. Kinetochore–microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes. Nat Cell Biol 17, 421–433 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3128

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing