Letter | Published:

Adaptive force transmission in amoeboid cell migration

Nature Cell Biology volume 11, pages 14381443 (2009) | Download Citation

Abstract

The leading front of a cell can either protrude as an actin-free membrane bleb that is inflated by actomyosin-driven contractile forces, or as an actin-rich pseudopodium, a site where polymerizing actin filaments push out the membrane1,2,3. Pushing filaments can only cause the membrane to protrude if the expanding actin network experiences a retrograde counter-force, which is usually provided by transmembrane receptors of the integrin family4. Here we show that chemotactic dendritic cells mechanically adapt to the adhesive properties of their substrate by switching between integrin-mediated and integrin-independent locomotion. We found that on engaging the integrin–actin clutch, actin polymerization was entirely turned into protrusion, whereas on disengagement actin underwent slippage and retrograde flow. Remarkably, accelerated retrograde flow was balanced by an increased actin polymerization rate; therefore, cell shape and protrusion velocity remained constant on alternating substrates. Due to this adaptive response in polymerization dynamics, tracks of adhesive substrate did not dictate the path of the cells. Instead, directional guidance was exclusively provided by a soluble gradient of chemoattractant, which endowed these 'amoeboid' cells with extraordinary flexibility, enabling them to traverse almost every type of tissue.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 730–736 (2008).

  2. 2.

    & Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 636–644 (2009).

  3. 3.

    On the edge: modeling protrusion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 32–39 (2006).

  4. 4.

    & Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84, 371–379 (1996).

  5. 5.

    et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).

  6. 6.

    et al. Cdc42-dependent leading edge coordination is essential for interstitial dendritic cell migration. Blood 113, 5703–5710 (2009).

  7. 7.

    et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nature Methods 5, 605–607 (2008).

  8. 8.

    et al. Two components of actin-based retrograde flow in sea urchin coelomocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 4075–4090 (1999).

  9. 9.

    , & Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 215–226 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Molecular mechanism of actin-dependent retrograde flow in lamellipodia of motile cells. Front. Biosci. 2, d260–270 (1997).

  11. 11.

    , & Mechanisms and consequences of dendritic cell migration. Immunity 29, 325–342 (2008).

  12. 12.

    & Measuring chemotaxis and chemokinesis: the under-agarose cell migration assay. Sci. STKE 2003, PL5 (2003).

  13. 13.

    & Random locomotion and chemotaxis of human blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in the presence of EDTA: PMN in close quarters require neither leukocyte integrins nor external divalent cations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11577–11582 (1997).

  14. 14.

    , , & The direction of membrane lipid flow in locomoting polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Science 247, 1229–1233 (1990).

  15. 15.

    et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453, 475–480 (2008).

  16. 16.

    , & Cell migration does not produce membrane flow. J. Cell Biol. 111, 1617–1622 (1990).

  17. 17.

    et al. The conduit system transports soluble antigens from the afferent lymph to resident dendritic cells in the T cell area of the lymph node. Immunity 22, 19–29 (2005).

  18. 18.

    , , & A molecular basis for integrin αMbeta 2 ligand binding promiscuity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48635–48642 (2002).

  19. 19.

    , , & Preferential attachment of membrane glycoproteins to the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of lamella. J. Cell Biol. 114, 1029–1036 (1991).

  20. 20.

    et al. The force-velocity relationship for the actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes. Curr. Biol. 13, 329–332 (2003).

  21. 21.

    et al. F- and G-actin concentrations in lamellipodia of moving cells. PLoS One 4, e4810 (2009).

  22. 22.

    , & Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 507–518 (2005).

  23. 23.

    & Growth cone advance is inversely proportional to retrograde F-actin flow. Neuron 14, 763–771 (1995).

  24. 24.

    & Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron 1, 761–772 (1988).

  25. 25.

    et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19771–19776 (2006).

  26. 26.

    et al. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. Methods 223, 77–92 (1999).

  27. 27.

    & Differential immunocompetence of macrophages derived using macrophage or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Leukoc. Biol. 51, 69–76 (1992).

  28. 28.

    et al. Protein repellent properties of covalently attached PEG coatings on nanostructured SiO(2)-based interfaces. Biomaterials 28, 4739–4747 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Cremer for statistical analysis, K. Hirsch for technical assistance, D. Critchley for talin1-deficient mice and R. Fässler for integrin-deficient mice, discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation, the Peter Hans Hofschneider Foundation for Experimental Biomedicine, the Max Planck Society, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the allergology programme of the Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Hofschneider Group Leukocyte Migration, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.

    • Jörg Renkawitz
    • , Kathrin Schumann
    • , Michele Weber
    • , Tim Lämmermann
    • , Holger Pflicke
    •  & Michael Sixt
  2. CNRS UMR144, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

    • Matthieu Piel
  3. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Molecular Medicine, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.

    • Julien Polleux
  4. Max Planck Institute of Metal Research, Department of New Materials and Biosystems, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

    • Julien Polleux
    •  & Joachim P. Spatz

Authors

  1. Search for Jörg Renkawitz in:

  2. Search for Kathrin Schumann in:

  3. Search for Michele Weber in:

  4. Search for Tim Lämmermann in:

  5. Search for Holger Pflicke in:

  6. Search for Matthieu Piel in:

  7. Search for Julien Polleux in:

  8. Search for Joachim P. Spatz in:

  9. Search for Michael Sixt in:

Contributions

J.R. and M.S. designed, performed and analysed experiments and wrote the manuscript. K.S., M.W., T.L. and H.P. performed experiments, M.P. contributed ideas and J.P. and J.P.S. provided passivated surfaces.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Sixt.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 1

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 2

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 3

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 4

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 5

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 6

  7. 7.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 7

  8. 8.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 8

  9. 9.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 9

  10. 10.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 10

  11. 11.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Movie 11

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1992

Further reading