Letter | Published:

d-Asb11 is an essential mediator of canonical Delta–Notch signalling

Nature Cell Biology volume 10, pages 11901198 (2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

In canonical Delta–Notch signalling, expression of Delta activates Notch in neighbouring cells, leading to downregulation of Delta in these cells1. This process of lateral inhibition results in selection of either Delta-signalling cells or Notch-signalling cells. Here we show that d-Asb11 is an important mediator of this lateral inhibition. In zebrafish embryos, morpholino oligonucleotide (MO)-mediated knockdown of d-Asb11 caused repression of specific Delta–Notch elements and their transcriptional targets, whereas these were induced when d-Asb11 was misexpressed. d-Asb11 also activated legitimate Notch reporters cell-non-autonomously in vitro and in vivo when co-expressed with a Notch reporter. However, it repressed Notch reporters when expressed in Delta-expressing cells. Consistent with these results, d-Asb11 was able to specifically ubiquitylate and degrade DeltaA both in vitro and in vivo. We conclude that d-Asb11 is a component in the regulation of Delta–Notch signalling, important in fine-tuning the lateral inhibition gradients between DeltaA and Notch through a cell non-autonomous mechanism.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 93–102 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Notch signaling: control of cell communication and cell fate. Development 131, 965–973 (2004).

  3. 3.

    & Notch signaling: from the outside in. Dev. Biol. 228, 151–165 (2000).

  4. 4.

    , , , & A new role for Notch and Delta in cell fate decisions: patterning the feather array. Development 125, 767–775 (1998).

  5. 5.

    & The Notch pathway: democracy and aristocracy in the selection of cell fate. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 594–601 (1996).

  6. 6.

    Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 213–222 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Why is delta endocytosis required for effective activation of notch? Dev. Dyn. 235, 886–894 (2006).

  8. 8.

    et al. Multiple levels of Notch signal regulation (review). Mol. Membr. Biol. 19, 27–38 (2002).

  9. 9.

    et al. Regulation of notch endosomal sorting and signaling by Drosophila Nedd4 family proteins. Curr. Biol. 14, 2237–2244 (2004).

  10. 10.

    et al. Monoubiquitination and endocytosis direct γ-secretase cleavage of activated Notch receptor. J. Cell Biol. 166, 73–83 (2004).

  11. 11.

    et al. SEL-10 is an inhibitor of notch signaling that targets notch for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 7403–7415 (2001).

  12. 12.

    et al. Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta. Dev. Cell 4, 67–82 (2003).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Drosophila neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that promotes the internalization and degradation of delta. Dev. Cell 1, 783–794 (2001).

  14. 14.

    & The interplay between DSL proteins and ubiquitin ligases in Notch signaling. Development 132, 4041–4050 (2005).

  15. 15.

    & Distinct roles for Mind bomb, Neuralized and Epsin in mediating DSL endocytosis and signaling in Drosophila. Development 132, 2883–2894 (2005).

  16. 16.

    et al. The novel gene asb11: a regulator of the size of the neural progenitor compartment. J. Cell Biol. 174, 581–592 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & Regulation of neuronal specification in the zebrafish spinal cord by Delta function. Development 125, 371–380 (1998).

  18. 18.

    et al. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature 377, 355–358 (1995).

  19. 19.

    et al. Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter of mouse Hes2 gene, a homologue of Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Genomics 49, 69–75 (1998).

  20. 20.

    , , , & The Nrarp gene encodes an ankyrin-repeat protein that is transcriptionally regulated by the notch signaling pathway. Dev. Biol. 238, 110–119 (2001).

  21. 21.

    et al. Nrarp is a novel intracellular component of the Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 15, 1885–1899 (2001).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Nrarp functions to modulate neural-crest-cell differentiation by regulating LEF1 protein stability. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 1106–1112 (2005).

  23. 23.

    , , & Xenopus neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that interacts with XDelta1 and regulates Notch signaling. Dev. Cell 1, 795–806 (2001).

  24. 24.

    , , , , & Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homolog of the Drosophila neurogenic gene-delta. Nature 375, 761–766 (1995).

  25. 25.

    et al. Repression of smoothened by patched-dependent (Pro-) vitamin D3 secretion. PLoS. Biol. 4, e232 (2006).

  26. 26.

    , , , , & Fluorescent protein expression driven by her4 regulatory elements reveals the spatiotemporal pattern of Notch signaling in the nervous system of zebrafish embryos. Dev. Biol. 301, 555–567 (2007).

  27. 27.

    & Induction of T cell development from hematopoietic progenitor cells by delta-like-1 in vitro. Immunity. 17, 749–756 (2002).

  28. 28.

    , , , , & Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dynam. 203, 253–310 (1995).

  29. 29.

    The Zebrafish Book (Eugene: University of Oregon Press, 1994).

  30. 30.

    , , , , & her1 and the notch pathway function within the oscillator mechanism that regulates zebrafish somitogenesis. Development 129, 1175–1183 (2002).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Delta-Notch signaling induces hypochord development in zebrafish. Development 129, 2555–2563 (2002).

  32. 32.

    et al. Effects of retinoic acid on the expression of retinoic acid receptors during zebrafish embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 46, 137–150 (1994).

  33. 33.

    & Histone deacetylase 1 is essential for oligodendrocyte specification in the zebrafish CNS. Mech. Dev. 123, 24–30 (2006).

  34. 34.

    A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank J. A. Campos-Ortega for providing the MT–notch1a ICD construct, B. Appel for the MT–deltaA construct and A. Israel for the different Hes1–luciferase reporter constructs. We thank R. Dorsky, C. Houart, P. Ingham, J.P. Concordet for the riboprobes. We thank J. Lewis for DeltaD antibody, G. Strous for HA–Ubiquitin, U. Strähle for XDeltastu. We are indebted to R. Dorsky and R. Moon for providing TOPdGFP fish. We thank Y.J. Jiang for advice. We also wish to thank K. Österreicher and D. Kolmer (TissueGnostics, GmbH) for their help in the quantification of the co-localization studies described in Supplementary Information, Fig. S2. NWO Casimir, NWO Genomics, NWO ALW, TIPharma and the IAG program of the province of Groningen and the European Commission are thanked for financial support. We are especially grateful to S. van de Water, S. van den Brink, A. Visser and L. Glazenburg for technical assistance and to the animal facility of the Hubrecht Institute for care of zebrafish.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Deptartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

    • Sander H. Diks
    • , Maria A. Sartori da Silva
    • , Jan-Luuk Hillebrands
    • , Henri H. Versteeg
    •  & Maikel P. Peppelenbosch
  2. Hubrecht Institute, Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research, Uppsalalaan 8, NL-3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    • Maria A. Sartori da Silva
    • , Robert J. Bink
    • , Carina van Rooijen
    • , Anke Brouwers
    •  & Danica Zivkovic
  3. Section on Neural Developmental Dynamics, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, NICHD, NIH, Bldg 6B Room 3B 315, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda MD 20892-2785, USA.

    • Ajay B. Chitnis

Authors

  1. Search for Sander H. Diks in:

  2. Search for Maria A. Sartori da Silva in:

  3. Search for Jan-Luuk Hillebrands in:

  4. Search for Robert J. Bink in:

  5. Search for Henri H. Versteeg in:

  6. Search for Carina van Rooijen in:

  7. Search for Anke Brouwers in:

  8. Search for Ajay B. Chitnis in:

  9. Search for Maikel P. Peppelenbosch in:

  10. Search for Danica Zivkovic in:

Contributions

S.H.D. contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting the manuscript; M.A.S.d.S. acquired, analysed and interpreted data; J.L.H., R.J.B., H.H.V., C.v.R. and A.B. acquired, analysed and interpreted data, and provided critical comments; M.P.P. analysed and interpreted the data; D.Z. acquired, analysed and interpreted data; M.P.P. and D.Z conceived and designed the study, and wrote and revised the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maikel P. Peppelenbosch.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, Supplementary Data and Supplementary Table 1

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1779