Letter | Published:

A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells

Nature Cell Biology volume 10, pages 353360 (2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are unique in their ability to self-renew indefinitely and maintain pluripotency. These properties require transcription factors that specify the gene expression programme of ES cells. It has been possible to reverse the highly differentiated state of somatic cells back to a pluripotent state with a combination of four transcription factors: Klf4 is one of the reprogramming factors required, in conjunction with Oct4, Sox2 and c-Myc. Maintenance of self-renewal and pluripotency of ES cells requires Oct4, Sox2 and c-Myc, but Klf4 is dispensable. Here, we show that Krüppel-like factors are required for the self-renewal of ES cells. Simultaneous depletion of Klf2, Klf4 and Klf5 lead to ES cell differentiation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to microarray assay reveals that these Klf proteins share many common targets of Nanog, suggesting a close functional relationship between these factors. Expression analysis after triple RNA interference (RNAi) of the Klfs shows that they regulate key pluripotency genes, such as Nanog. Taken together, our study provides new insight into how the core Klf circuitry integrates into the Nanog transcriptional network to specify gene expression that is unique to ES cells.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1.

    Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 19, 1129–1155 (2005).

  2. 2.

    , & Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell 128, 747–762 (2007).

  3. 3.

    & Debugging cellular reprogramming. Nature Cell. Biol. 9, 871–873 (2007).

  4. 4.

    & Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

  5. 5.

    , & Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313–317 (2007).

  6. 6.

    et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324 (2007).

  7. 7.

    et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–71 (2007).

  8. 8.

    , & Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372–376 (2000).

  9. 9.

    et al. Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442, 533–538 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell. Biol. 9, 625–635 (2007).

  12. 12.

    et al. LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism. Development 132, 885–896 (2005).

  13. 13.

    , , & The diverse functions of Kruppel-like factors 4 and 5 in epithelial biology and pathobiology. Bioessays 29, 549–557 (2007).

  14. 14.

    et al. Klf4 cooperates with Oct3/4 and Sox2 to activate the Lefty1 core promoter in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 7772–7782 (2006).

  15. 15.

    et al. Dissecting Oct3/4-regulated gene networks in embryonic stem cells by expression profiling. PLoS 1, e26 (2006).

  16. 16.

    et al. Sall4 modulates embryonic stem cell pluripotency and early embryonic development by the transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1. Nature Cell. Biol. 8, 1114–1123 (2006).

  17. 17.

    et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95, 379–391 (1998).

  18. 18.

    et al. Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. Genes Dev. 17, 126–140 (2003).

  19. 19.

    et al. SAGE identification of gene transcripts with profiles unique to pluripotent mouse R1 embryonic stem cells. Genomics 79, 169–176 (2002).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Protecting genomic integrity in somatic cells and embryonic stem cells. Mutat. Res. 614, 48–55 (2007).

  21. 21.

    et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631–642 (2003).

  22. 22.

    et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643–655 (2003).

  23. 23.

    et al. The gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor (Kruppel-like factor 4) mediates the transactivating effect of p53 on the p21WAF1/Cip1 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18391–18398 (2000).

  24. 24.

    et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191–195 (2007).

  25. 25.

    et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196–199 (2007).

  26. 26.

    et al. Murine embryonic stem cell differentiation is promoted by SOCS-3 and inhibited by the zinc finger transcription factor Klf4. Blood 105, 635–637 (2005).

  27. 27.

    , & The KLF4 tumour suppressor is a transcriptional repressor of p53 that acts as a context-dependent oncogene. Nature Cell. Biol. 7, 1074–1082 (2005).

  28. 28.

    , & Lung Kruppel-like factor, a zinc finger transcription factor, is essential for normal lung development. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21180–21185 (1999).

  29. 29.

    et al. The LKLF transcription factor is required for normal tunica media formation and blood vessel stabilization during murine embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 2996–3006 (1997).

  30. 30.

    et al. Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration. Nature 442, 299–302 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Biomedical Research Council (BMRC) and Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) for funding. J.J is supported by the Singapore Millennium Foundation graduate scholarship and the NUS graduate scholarship. Y.-H.L. and C.-A.L. are supported by the A*STAR graduate scholarships. We are grateful to T. Lufkin for D3 ES cells and K.Kuay and D.-X. Lin for technical support. We thank T. Huber and E. Cheung for critical comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Yun-Shen Chan
    • , Yuin-Han Loh
    •  & Jun Cai

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Gene Regulation Laboratory, Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, #02-01, Genome Building, Singapore 138672.

    • Jianming Jiang
    • , Yun-Shen Chan
    • , Yuin-Han Loh
    • , Ching-Aeng Lim
    •  & Huck-Hui Ng
  2. Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543.

    • Jianming Jiang
    • , Yun-Shen Chan
    • , Yuin-Han Loh
    • , Ching-Aeng Lim
    • , Paul Robson
    •  & Huck-Hui Ng
  3. Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Springfield Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

    • Jun Cai
    •  & Sheng Zhong
  4. Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, 02-01, Genome Building, Singapore 138672.

    • Guo-Qing Tong
    •  & Paul Robson
  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 123 Tian Fei Road, PR China 210004.

    • Guo-Qing Tong

Authors

  1. Search for Jianming Jiang in:

  2. Search for Yun-Shen Chan in:

  3. Search for Yuin-Han Loh in:

  4. Search for Jun Cai in:

  5. Search for Guo-Qing Tong in:

  6. Search for Ching-Aeng Lim in:

  7. Search for Paul Robson in:

  8. Search for Sheng Zhong in:

  9. Search for Huck-Hui Ng in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huck-Hui Ng.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary figures S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Table 1

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Table 2

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Table 3

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1698

Further reading